Blog Entries [570 - 579]Tuesday, February 18, 2020
Music Week
February archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 32778 [32759] rated (+19), 242 [241] unrated (+1).
Late again, but short as weeks go, given that last week's
Music Week
didn't appear until Thursday, February 13. My excuse then was that
I was in the middle of a series on Duke Ellington's Chronological
Classics (up to 1940, anyway). I decided not to bother with the
1940-1953 releases, figuring they're redundant to in-print albums
on RCA and Columbia (and maybe Capitol?), but I've continued to
trawl through Napster's offerings, using "ellington" as my titles
search. That netted a few albums by other doing Ellington songs --
including titles by Ella Fitzgerald, Nina Simone, Zoot Sims, and
Sarah Vaughan, below. I haven't hit the end of that list yet, so
I'll keep plugging, and see what else catched my fancy. I briefly
considered doing more individual albums from The Complete Ella
Fitzgerald Song Books, which I bought long ago and gave an A-
to without subdividing, but I haven't followed up on that. (If I
recall correctly, the best volume is the Harold Arlen, possibly
followed by Irving Berlin or Cole Porter; the weakest may well be
the Ellington, which is surprising given how much I like the later
Ella and Duke at the Côte D'Azur -- a 2-CD sampler from a
larger box I haven't heard, but which I believe is on Napster.)
All this old music digging has kept me off from new music, with
only a few of my queue offerings this week. Robert Christgau sent
his
Consumer Guide out to subscribers last week, and included two new
2020 releases among his picks (Eminem and Drive-By Truckers) among his
late-breaking 2019 picks (catching up with his
Dean's List). Normally I'd jump on them, but this hasn't been a
normal week.
Christgau followed that up with another list,
Ten Movies I Love. I can't argue, not least because I've only
seen four of those movies, and don't even recall hearing of most of
the rest. [PS: Make that five: I've seen, but forgot the title of,
Make Way for Tomorrow] I doubt I could even construct such
a list, but I'd hate to leave out:
- Babette's Feast -- Gabriel Axel (1988)
- Before Sunrise -- Richard Linklater (1995)
- Hairspray -- John Waters (1988)
- High Hopes -- Mike Leigh (1989)
- Johnny Dangerously -- Amy Heckerling (1984)
- Made in Heaven -- Alan Rudolph (1987)
- Moonstruck -- Norman Jewison (1987)
- The Mosquito Coast -- Peter Weir (1986)
- O Brother, Where Art Thou? -- Ethan & Joel Cohen (2000)
- Ordinary People -- Robert Redford (1980)
- The Purple Rose of Cairo -- Woody Allen (1985)
- The Remains of the Day -- James Ivory (1993)
- Stars and Bars -- Pat O'Connor (1988)
- Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown -- Pedro Almodovar (1988)
First of all, I'm surprised to find these so concentrated in time:
1985-1995 accounts for all but two, one from 1980, the other 2000.
The obvious explanation is that I watched a lot more movies then than
any time before or since. I hardly ever watched movies before, aside
from minor binges, but started renting tapes after my first wife died,
and watched even more when I dated and moved in with Laura. My movie
watching has tailed off in recent years, but not as dramatically as
the omission of post-2000 movies in the list above suggests. Perhaps
I was just more impressionable in that first decade. I did a quick
search through the notebook, and found a lot of good movies, but the
only ones that tempted me to add to the list were: Almost Famous
(Cameron Crowe, 2000); The Barbarian Invasions (Denys Arcand,
2003); De-Lovely (Irwin Winkler, 2004); Letters From Iwo
Jima (Clint Eastwood, 2006); The Lives of Others (Florian
Henckel von Donnersmarck, 2007); The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
(2009, in Swedish); and Boyhood (2014).
A second point is that these are mostly small movies. (Three were
nominated for Oscars, and one won.) A glance through
the Oscar list and other lists at {
IMDB,
TimeOut,
MSN
} suggest some better-known epics that I like (in many cases a lot),
in chronological order (while generally avoiding repeating directors
from above):
Modern Times (1936);
Grand Illusion (1937);
His Girl Friday (1940);
Sullivan's Travels (1941);
Casablanca (1942);
The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957);
Dr. Strangelove (1964);
Blazing Saddles (1964);
Ship of Fools (1965);
Once Upon a Time in the West (1968);
Z (1969);
The Godfather (1972);
Cries and Whispers (1973);
The Godfather II (1974);
Chinatown (1974);
Nashville (1975);
Atlantic City (1981);
The Last Emperor (1987);
Do the Right Thing (1989);
Unforgiven (1992);
Pulp Fiction (1994);
The Shawshank Redemption (1994);
L.A. Confidential (1997);
Shakespeare in Love (1998);
Moulin Rouge! (2001);
Brokeback Mountain (2005);
Slumdog Millionaire (2008),
La La Land (2016). Most frequently listed movies that I haven't
seen (or don't recall) date from before 1960, including a fair number
of "foreign" films. Too bad I didn't maintain a list, like I did for
albums.
Contributing to this week's delay, I cooked a rather fancy dinner
Monday night. I made a couple stabs at Hungarian cuisine last fall,
and had a few more recipes I wanted to try. My cookbook was Silvena
Johan Lauta's The Food & Cooking of Hungary, but it didn't
offer any promising vegetable side dishes, so I slipped a Greek fave
into the menu:
- Rabbit Goulash Stew
- Venison Meatballs
- Hungarian Dumplings
- Green Bean Ragout
- Transylvanian Stuffed Mushrooms
- Somloi Trifle
Not sure I got the first three quite right. The meatballs were quite
delicious, but could have used more sauce. I had a lot of trouble cutting
up the rabbit, which made everything come out late. The one piece I had
was a little tough and dry, but others disagreed. The mushrooms (stuffed
with ricotta, bacon, and herbs) perhaps should have been cooked longer.
Still, all came out pretty tasty.
The dessert wasn't in the cookbook, but showed up repeatedly when I
was attempting to survey Hungarian recipes online -- along with a fancy
multi-layer cake called a
dobos torte. I
wound up consulting several web recipes, mostly following
this one, but taking a few liberties along the way (e.g., after my
caramelized syrup burned, I went with a much safer non-caramel recipe;
I missed the liquor store, so substituted amaretto for rum; I substuted
apricot for strawberry jam, as all other recipes specified [PS: what I
actually used was Bonne Maman Mango-Peach Preserves, made in France;
picked up accidentally when I was reaching for the apricot]). The dessert
is a pretty complicated affair: first make three sponge cakes (one plain,
one with walnuts, a third with cocoa); make a light syrup with liquor
(in my case, amaretto), and brush it over the cakes; make a "gruel" out
of milk, sugar, flour, eggs, vanilla (more like a pudding -- other recipes
use a pastry cream); build a stack of the three cakes, each one topped
with a shmear of jam, raisins (soaked in syrup), walnuts, and
"gruel"; sprinkle cocoa on top and chill for 12 hours. Make a chocolate
sauce, with liquor (amaretto again). Whip cream. To serve, scoop out
chunks of cake, top with chocolate, then with whipped cream. Before I
was done, I doubted I'd ever do it again, but it turned out to be
remarkably delicious.
A few links I had meant to include in Sunday's
Weekend Roundup, but somehow didn't get to:
Kos:
Sanders wins New Hampshire by being the least-weak of a suddenly weak
field. This was a "hot take" after New Hampshire, but since then
I'm less persuaded of Bernie Sanders' "weakness." Sanders now seems
to be ahead in Nevada, possibly ahead in South Carolina, indeed close
to leading pretty much everywhere (FiveThirtyEight still likes Biden
in Alabama). I've also seen polls that show his favorability ratings
are high enough to give him a reasonable expectation of gaining vote
share as other candidates drop out (much as Trump did in 2016, though
Bernie's are higher than Trump's were, at least up to the 2016 convention,
maybe even the election). Also, this article makes some really dumb points,
such as:
No white male has ever gotten 63 million votes in a presidential election.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both hit 65 million. When our nominees
look like our base, we perform better.
That doesn't prove anything, least of all its "looks like" conclusion.
(Sure, it would disprove the opposite assertion, that you have to run a
white male in order to win, but that's not the point here.) I remember
when Clinton promised a cabinet that "looks like America," but all they
looked like to me was a bunch of well-heeled lawyers. He throws out
other meaningless facts, like Bloomberg was "major of a city that is
larger than 38 states" [each of; the 9 least populous states + DC have
more people combined than NYC], and he invents a ridiculous euphemism
for dollars, as in "he spent another 3.5 million electability units on
advertising in black newspapers."
Joel Kotkin:
You think Trump's a danger to democracy? Get a load of Bloomberg.
Side note more relevant to the Kos article above: to win his third
term as mayor of New York, Bloomberg spent $174 per vote; to match
that running for president, he'll have to pony up $12 billion.
Alexander Rubinstein/Max Blumenthal:
Woke wonk Elizabeth Warren's foreign policy team is stacked with pro-war
swamp creatures.
I should also note that a Guardian article I linked to about Bill
Gates buying a £500 million superyacht has been pulled, due to "a
fundamental error in facts reported." Evidently, Gates hasn't bought
any such boat.
New records reviewed this week:
The Coachella Valley Trio: Mid Century Modern
(2019 [2020], DMAC): Guitarist Doug MacDonald, backed by bass and
drums, with Big Black on djembe for 6/11 tracks. Four MacDonald
originals, the rest easy flowing jazz standards.
B+(*)
Lara Driscoll: Woven Dreams (2019 [2020], Firm Roots
Music): Pianist, from Chicago, trio with Paul Rushka on bass and Dave
Laing on drums. Not much to say on this, other than that she always
seems spot on.
B+(***) [03-06]
Lara Driscoll: Woven Dreams (2019 [2020], Firm Roots
Music): Pianist, from Chicago, trio with Paul Rushka on bass and Dave
Laing on drums. Not much to say on this, other than that she always
seems spot on.
B+(***) [03-06]
Kuzu [Dave Rempis/Tashi Dorji/Tyler Damon]: Purple Dark
Opal (2019 [2020], Aerophonic): Avant sax-guitar-drums trio,
did a couple albums last year including one that I belatedly got
behind (Hiljaisus) and one (Lift to Drag) I missed.
Maybe slow on this one too, but for now:
B+(***) [cd]
Purna Loka Ensemble: Metaraga (2018-19 [2020],
Origin): Indian string quartet based in Lawrence, KS, where violinist
Purnaprajna Bangere teaches mathematics and music. With second violin,
bass, and tabla, with a guest spot for clarinet, rooted in classical
Indian music, but not stuck there.
B+(**) [cd]
Old music:
Duke Ellington: The Best of Early Ellington (1926-31
[1996], Decca): Twenty songs from Decca's 3-CD Early Ellington:
The Complete Brunswick and Vocalion Recordings of Duke Ellington
1926-1931, which appeared a couple years earlier and is worth
owning complete (my grade: A+). Two caveats here: I've long deemed
the Bluebirds from the same period to have better sound, not that
I have any complaints here (and they're way better than the Okehs
and the Classics archives); and I miss some of the covers on the
box. Still, these are the essential songs from the first great
Ellington era, and they're as perfect as music gets.
A+
Duke Ellington: The Centennial Collection (1927-41
[2004], Bluebird): BMG released five volumes under this title, the
others Benny Goodman, Glenn Miller, Artie Shaw, and Fats Waller --
all recorded for Bluebird before 1945, so these work as single-disc
primers, each packaged with a DVD I have no reckoning of. Don't have
dates, but initial recordings range as above, though most of these
pieces are live shots, possibly tied to the DVD. Some great music
here, but I don't find this to be particularly useful.
B+(**)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: The Great Paris Concert
(1963 [1973], Atlantic, 2CD): Three concerts, actually, nicely organized
for its original 2-LP release (total 87:35), so much so it might serve
as a suitable introductory overview for neophytes -- even includes a full
suite, and one vocal track to remind you Ellington never had a knack for
hiring singers. Even more freakish is Cat Anderson's stratospheric
trumpet -- one of many wonders.
A-
Duke Ellington: Duke Ellington's My People (1963 [1964],
Contact): A short-lived Broadway musical, "conceived, written and staged
by Duke Ellington," orchestra conducted by Jimmy Jones (but "under the
personal supervision of Billy Strayhorn"), headlined by Joya Sherrill.
Ellington tended to get stilted in projects that aimed beyond the music
(e.g., his later "sacred music" concerts), but this one moves right along,
and his black history points are well taken.
B+(**)
Duke Ellington/Ella Fitzgerald/Oscar Peterson: The Greatest
Jazz Concert in the World (1967 [1990], Pablo, 3CD): The CD
reissue added the principle artist's names above the title, a banner
missing from the original 1975 4-LP box, although their primacy was
made clear by centering their portraits, surrounded by an outer ring
with Benny Carter, Coleman Hawkins, Zoot Sims, Clark Terry, T-Bone
Walker, and eight current members of Ellington's Orchestra. This was
one of Norman Granz's Jazz at the Philharmonic productions, actually
two shows, one in March at Carnegie Hall, the other in July at the
Hollywood Bowl, varying from his usual all-star jam formula mostly
in Ellington's dominance: 21 cuts, including 5 with Fitzgerald (of
her 9). I'm on the fence here: Peterson's intro and the jams are
fun, the Ellington set is above par, and Fitzgerald has a spark here
that is never really captured in their studio albums. Still, doesn't
really merit the hyperbole.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: In Sweden 1973 (1973 [1999], Caprice):
Late, the fabulous orchestra starting to fall apart (no Johnny Hodges,
Paul Gonsalves, Cat Anderson), so local reinforcements are welcome:
Rolf Ericson (trumpet), Åke Persson (trombone), Nils Lindberg, and
featured singer Alice Babs.
B+(**)
Ella Fitzgerald: The Complete Ella Fitzgerald Song Books
(1956-64 [1993], 16CD): One of Norman Granz's more successful "get rich
slow" projects was having Ella sing every song in "the great American
songbook" -- I suspect that phrase came later, and were you to look it
up, the most succinct definition would be: "songs Ella Fitzgerald sang."
They were released on many LPs, eventually collected in this box, as
well as released on separately available CD sets. I bought the box, gave
it an A- (my standard at the time for multi-disc boxes was weakest link),
but didn't break it down further. Maybe it's time to do that.
Ella Fitzgerald: Sings the Duke Ellington Songbook
(1956-57 [1991], Verve, 3CD): Key thing here is the band: Ellington
and His Orchestra. They got co-credit on the origial 1957 4-LP set,
before "songbook" became a single word and a Fitzgerald trademark.
She is, of course, miles ahead of any singer Ellington ever hired,
adding import and sass to lyrics that often just an afterthought --
but that may be because the band never really needed them. Two real
solid CDs here, although I like some of their later live recordings
even better. Third disc bogs down a lot, and not just the alternate
takes and chatter.
B+(**)
Ella Fitzgerald: The Very Best of the Duke Ellington Song
Book (1956-57 [2007], Verve): Second attempt at reducing
the original 4-LP (3-CD) set to a single CD, following 1995's Day
Dream: The Best of the Duke Ellington Songbook (B+, long ago),
the "very" justified by reduction (12 tracks, 56:09, vs. 17 tracks,
70:08) and by picking more obvious titles: only 5 tracks appear on
both, and you can easily guess them if I give you the adds here:
"Sophisticated Lady," "Satin Doll," "Do Nothin' Till You Hear From
Me," "Prelude to a Kiss," "In a Sentimental Mood," "Caravan," and
"Don't Get Around Much Anymore." Should be foolproof, but you can
hardly hear the band through the ballads, and while the singer is
artful enough, you just know she'd rather bust loose and scat.
B+(***)
Ella Fitzgerald: Ella at Duke's Place (1965 [1966],
Verve): Studio date in Hollywood with Ellington and His Orchestra,
ten songs, only two repeated from the 1956-57 sessions. Divided into
a "Pretty, Lovely, Tender, Hold Me Close Side" and a "Finger-Snapping,
Head Shaking, Toe-Tapping, Go-For-Yourself Side" -- the latter is
more fun, but still not as much as a live set like Ella and Duke
at the Côte D'Azur (1966).
B+(**)
Nina Simone: Nina Simone Sings Duke Ellington (1961
[1962], Colpix): Simone's arrangements, produced by Stu Phillips,
backed by the Malcolm Dodds Singers, no credits for the band (but
Simone no doubt holds court on piano). The obscurities don't stick
with you, but the mainstays are tastefully done (especially "Satin
Doll").
B+(*)
Zoot Sims: Passion Flower: Zoot Sims Plays Duke Ellington
(1979-80 [1997], Pablo/OJC): Tenor saxophonist, sources list him only as
leader but this sounds like him, in front of a big band with stars like
JJ Johnson, Frank Wess, and Jimmy Rowles, arranged and conducted by Benny
Carter.
B+(**)
Sarah Vaughan: How Long Has This Been Going On? (1978,
Pablo): Despite her remarkable voice and exquisite control of nuance,
she rarely makes albums I like. But Norman Granz grabbed her when he
launched Pablo, and teamed her up with his default band: Oscar Peterson
(piano), Joe Pass (guitar), Ray Brown (bass), and Louie Bellson (drums).
Cover inserts a spurious "between" between the title and artists -- the
singer first in only slightly larger type. Still likes them slow, but
the band's light touch saves the day.
B+(***)
Sarah Vaughan: Duke Ellington: Song Book One (1979 [1980],
Pablo): Billy Byers' strings are suspect here, but the rest of the band --
with Waymon Reed on trumpet, JJ Johnson on trombone, Frank Foster and Zoot
Sims on tenor sax, Bucky Pizzarelli or Joe Pass on guitar, Jimmy Rowles or
Mike Wofford on piano -- is impeccable.
B+(***)
Sarah Vaughan; Duke Ellington: Song Book Two (1979 [1980],
Pablo): Same group, same sessions, eleven more songs, most excellent,
only a tad less impressive.
B+(**)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Joyce Grant: Surrounded by Blue (Craftedair/Blujazz)
- JC Hopkins Biggish Band: New York Moment (Twee-Jazz) [04-05]
- Chanda Rule + Sweet Emma Band: Hold On (Blujazz/PAO)
- Paul Shaw Quintet: Moment of Clarity (Summit) [03-27]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, February 16, 2020
Weekend Roundup
New Hampshire finally voted last week.
Bernie Sanders won, although not by the margin I had hoped for --
25.58% to 24.27% for Pete Buttigieg, 19.69% for Klobuchar, with
significant drops for Elizabeth Warren (9.19%) and Joe Biden (8.34%).
Sanders did, however,
get more young voters than everyone else combined. As I note in
the German Lopez note below, the Buttigieg/Klobuchar bubble seems to
have less to do with anything attractive about their platforms than
with the irrational fears of many Democrats (including some older
ones who are philosophically aligned left, but grew up in a world
where red-baiting was always effective) that Sanders would wind up
losing to Trump. How they figure Buttigieg or Klobuchar might fare
better is something I don't care to speculate on. Neither has the
familiarity or national organization they'll need in coming weeks,
and their repeated (misinformed and disingenuous) attacks on Medicare
for All in recent months, while effective for raising donations and
establishing themselves as niche candidates, makes them improbable
(as well as damn unsatisfactory) party unifiers.
Biden is still better positioned to recover in later primaries, but
did himself much harm in Iowa and New Hampshire. In particular, he lost
favor with the "anybody but Trump (except Sanders)" party faction, and
his support among Afro-Americans was never any deeper than a cautious
wager. Biden has slipped behind Sanders in national polls, lost his big
lead in Nevada, and may even lose his "firewall" state of South Carolina
(see
FiveThirtyEight, which also forecasts Sanders to lead in most
"Super Tuesday" contests, including: California, Texas, Florida,
North Carolina, Virginia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Colorado, and
Tennessee -- in fact, the only state Biden is still favored in is
Alabama). FiveThirtyEight still projects Biden to finish second,
but they already have Michael Bloomberg in a close third, with
Buttigieg a distant fourth, Warren with vanishingly slim chances
in fifth, and Klobuchar even further behind. That assumes they
all keep running, which almost certainly won't happen.
[PS: Closing this now to get it up and out of the way. I've been
running into frustrating dead ends seems like everywhere.]
Some scattered links this week:
Eric Alterman:
The modern GOP is built on lies. A few tired examples here, going
back to Nixon, but nothing that even pretends to argue, "in some ways
Trump is more truthful than previous Republican presidents." I might
concede that Trump's lies are more self-revealing than those of his
predecessors, and add that the biggest lie of all was Reagan's "morning
in America" slogan, which encouraged Americans to deny reality and live
in their own heads. Do that long enough and you eventually get to a
guy like Trump, who can't tell the difference, let alone care.
Michael Arria:
Amy Klobuchar says she would work on increasing support for Israel if
elected president. Related: Stephen Zunes:
Klobuchar has pushed extreme right-wing policy on Israel/Palestine.
Monifa Bandele:
Take it from an activist who was there: Stop and frisk cost New Yorkers
their lives.
Ross Barkan:
Michael Bloomberg isn't a smug technocratic centrist. He's something far
worse.
Alexander Burns/Nicholas Kulish:
Bloomberg's billions: How the candidate built an empire of influence.
As David Sirota tweeted:
In investment terms, this story makes clear Bloomberg spent years buying
large blocs of shares of the Beltway Democratic apparatus, and now he's
trying to buy the primary to complete a hostile takeover.
Jonathan Chait:
Obama auto standards may survive because Trump staff can't do math:
"Malevolence tempered by incompetence."
Barr wants to hide Trump's authoritarian plans, but Trump keeps
confessing: "A president uninterested in theory never stops
asserting his 'absolute right' to destroy democracy."
Trump: If Romney was truly religious, he'd have convicted me on both
counts. Sounds like Trump has a pretty bizarre notion of religion,
but also reminds us that Romney's stand on principle was wobbly at the
knees.
The GOP elite couldn't stop Trump in 2016. But maybe Democrats can stop
Bernie. Yeah, but how hard did the "GOP elite" really try? Trump is
an embarrassment, but he never really challenges orthodoxy, and he
delivers votes for an agenda that is deeply unpopular. (When he does
slip up, he apologizes quickly. Sure, his racist outbursts are the
exception, suggesting that's something "GOP elites" have no serious
problems with). By the way, who are these "GOP elites," and how do
they enforce party discipline? Looks to me like a loosely connected
circle of like-minded but mostly independent billionaire donors, kept
in sync by propaganda networks like Fox News. The donors signaled
their acceptance of Trump when they pulled the rug out from under
Cruz and Kasich, when they were still likely to win a few primaries.
Thanks to the Clintons and Obama, Democrat elites are more organized
to control the party, and they are ideologically disposed to beat
down any leftist deviations, as a big part of their pitch to donors
over the last 30-40 years was that they could control the masses
while making the world more profitable for the oligarchs. And unlike
GOP elites view of Trump, they really do see left-populism as a threat,
to their worldview as well as their all-important patronage. So Chait
won't be able to lament their lack of effort, although he still may be
disappointed at how ineffective they may be. Biden, Buttigieg, and
Klobuchar don't have half a vision between them, and their resolve
to do nothing but accommodate business interests is less inspiring
than ever. Chait regrets that the do-nothings don't have a charismatic
candidate in 2020 like Obama in 2008, but why should he think that
would do the trick? (It's not clear now that Obama had much vision
either, but at least he let people imagine he did.) Obama showed us
how little progress mere competent moderation delivers -- not enough
to lift Hillary over Trump, who was able to campaign on "what do you
have to lose?"
Joe Biden's campaign was a disaster for liberalism and the Democratic
Party: If "liberalism and the Democratic Party" couldn't find a
more articulate candidate than Biden, maybe the disaster was already
there, just something not just Biden couldn't fix. After Hillary lost
to Trump, it should have been obvious that the Clinton-Obama-Biden
formula had run its course. Chait blames Biden for denying promising
candidates the money they needed to run competitive races, but wasn't
his weakness clear a year ago?
Trump fires Defense official for refusing the break the law on his
behalf: Elaine McCusker.
Here's what I do like about Bernie Sanders.
David Dayen:
The lessons of the Culinary Union health care fight. Turns out
the reason the Las Vegas union is so anti-Sanders is that they own
and run their own health care provider system, which gives them a
conflict of interest between their own business interest and the
class of workers they represent. One reason unions are in such sad
shape these days is that too many of them started thinking of
themselves as separate from the broader working class. By the way,
Pete Buttigieg tried to latch onto this one particular (but in next
week's Nevada caucuses, strategic) union as support for his attacks
on Medicare for All, not realizing (or caring) it's a minority
position among unions. See Jason Lemon:
Union president accuses Pete Buttigieg of 'perpetuating this gross
myth' about union health care: 'This is offensive'.
Benjamin Dixon:
Michael Bloomberg's campaign is an insult to democracy.
Lee Fang:
Christopher Flavelle:
Global financial giants swear off funding an especially dirty fuel:
Alberta oil sands.
Melvin Goodman:
The real John Bolton. By the way, Jeffrey St. Clair:
Roaming charges: The steal of the century, has an amusing screen
shot of Lou Dobbs backed by a framed photo of Bolton captioned: "A
TOOL FOR THE LEFT." It's true that Bolton's always been a tool, but
you only have to be marginally smarter than Dobbs to realize he's
never been one of ours.
Ryan Grim:
Umair Irfan:
Antarctica broke two temperature records in a week. Related:
Juan Cole:
It is 65° F in Antarctica and if the Thwaites Glacier plops in, expect 4 ft
of sea level rise.
Sarah Jones:
Michael Bloomberg defended fingerpriting food-stamp recipients in 2018
interview.
Fred Kaplan:
Ed Kilgore:
Michael Kranish:
Maris Kreizman:
$2 million book deals about the Trump administration are anything but
brave: "John Bolton's latest tell-all book deal is part of a worrying
trend within publishing."
Nicholas Kristof:
The hidden depression Trump isn't helping.
John le Carré:
On Brexit: 'It's breaking my heart'. Also colors his remembrance of
Olof Palme, the assassinated Swedish statesman whose name adorns a prize
le Carré was just awarded.
Joshua Leifer:
A tense relationship: "The vexed history of Zionism and the left."
A review of Susie Linfield's book, The Lion's Den: Zionism and the
Left From Hannah Arendt to Noam Chomsky.
Will Leitch:
Pete Rose's plea to be unbanned from baseball is right out of the Trump
playbook. Well, with Trump in his corner, maybe this isn't the best
time to even partially rehabilitate Rose. Trump seems to feel that the
right politics excuses (or at least merits forgiveness for) all manner
of wrongdoing, while those with wrong politics should be harassed and
jailed. As such, he's managed to lump Rose in with the likes of Joe
Arpaio and Eddie Gallagher (the Navy SEAL charged with war crimes).
Nonetheless, I will say, as I've always said, that being banned from
ever working for (or owning a stake in) any MLB organization is one
thing, and being ineligible to have your pre-ban achievements evaluated
by the Base Ball Hall of Fame is (or should be) another (and the fact
that they aren't is really the fault of the BBHOF). I always thought
Rose was slightly overrated as a ballplayer, but I was more bothered
by the adoring sports writers who bought into his Charlie Hustle act.
When you look at his numbers in context, he wasn't anyway near the
second coming of Ty Cobb, but he was comparable to long time Hall of
Famers like Sam Crawford, Zack Wheat, Paul Waner, and Paul Molitor (who
Baseball References regards as Rose's most similar batter, followed
by Robin Yount, Waner, and George Brett; they also list Tris Speaker
and Ty Cobb at 2 and 3, and Cap Anson at 7, but clearly aren't making
necessary adjustments for cross-historical context; more telling is
the "most similar by ages" chart, which only matches Rose with three
HOFers, for a single year each, from ages 22-37: Molitor, Rod Carew,
and Freddie Lindstrom; on the other hand, he has multi-year matches
with Buddy Lewis and Johnny Damon; everyone from 38-45 is in the HOF,
but few lesser players last that long; even so, 38-41 is Molitor, 42
Waner, 43-44 Rickey Henderson, and 45 Anson). One irony since Rose
was banned is that the steroid scandal has kept far greater stars
like Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens out of the HOF (Bonds' most similar
matches are Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, and Babe Ruth; Clemens' top ten
matches are all in the HOF, and that doesn't include what would have
been my first guess, Lefty Grove). Another irony is that if you gave
in and considered Rose, you'd probably also have to consider another
banned gambler whose career (until he got banned) resembled Cobb's
even more: Shoeless Joe Jackson. On the other hand, if you do insist
on imposing a morals clause on HOF membership, why not kick a few
folks out? Cap Anson was singularly responsible for driving black
players out of MLB in the late 1880s, and a long list of executives
continued the color ban until 1947 -- first among equals there was
Kenesaw Mountain Landis (the commissioner who banned Jackson and
set the precedent for Rose, although he later whitewashed similar
charges against Cobb and Speaker).
Nicholas Lemann:
Can journalism be saved? A review of many books, one of the few
posts at this site without a paywall lock.
Mary Kay Linge/Jon Levine:
Bloomberg reportedly considering Hillary Clinton as his running mate:
One thing I've noticed this week is that I find Bloomberg so despicable
I'm willing to give credence to any story, no matter how dubious the
source, that makes him appear even more evil (or stupid or vain or
conceited or vile).
German Lopez:
Bernie Sanders lost among New Hampshire voters focused most on beating
Trump. I saw this poll referred to first in
FiveThirtyEight's New Hampshire live blog (since deleted?), and it
goes a long way to explaining the results.
But among the 34 percent of New Hampshire voters who prioritized a
candidate who agrees with them on major issues, Sanders led with 39
percent support, with Buttigieg and Klobuchar lagging far behind at
21 and 12 percent respectively. (The top issues, according to the
same poll: health care, climate change, and income inequality.) . . .
While voters may name concrete priorities when asked by pollsters,
voters in reality balance a whole host of variables, from electability
to policy positions to personal likability, when picking a nominee.
But given that so much of Democratic voters' attention is going to
beating Trump -- and has been for some time -- this conflict between
electability and policy positions will likely be a major one for the
rest of the primary season.
For Sanders, now the frontrunner, it also seems to be a notable
weakness. It's not just that he lost among voters who prioritize
beating Trump. Democrats in general seem to view him as less electable,
at least according to the New Hampshire exit polls: Asked who stands
the best chance against Trump, 27 percent of voters said Buttigieg,
21 percent said Klobuchar, and 19 percent said Sanders.
This sounds like a lot of Democrats are so chickenshit they're
willing to pick inferior candidates if they think they might fare
better against Trump. The reasoning, I suppose, is that any Democrat
would be better than Trump, which runs the risk of sliding into the
notion that the Democrat most similar to Trump would capture the
widest slice of in-between voters.
Virginia is poised to decriminalize marijuana.
Annie Lowrey:
The Berniephobes are wrong: "Wall Street fears the rise of the Vermont
senator. The rest of America has less to worry about."
Ann E Marimow:
Trump takes on Judge Amy Berman Jackson ahead of Roger Stone's
sentencing.
Ian Millhiser:
Nicole Narea:
Trump is sending armed tactical forces to arrest immigrants in sanctuary
cities.
Osita Nwanevu:
End the GOP: "In order to save our democracy, we must not merely
defeat the Republican Party."
Alex Pareene:
Michael Bloomberg's polite authoritarianism.
Andrew Prokop:
Joe Ragazzo:
There's no resurgence in American manufacturing. It's a myth.
Nathan J Robinson:
A Republican plutocrat tries to buy the Democratic nomination: "No
Democrat should consider Michael Bloomberg as a candidate."
Aaron Rupar:
Charlie Savage/Adam Goldman/Julian E Barnes:
Justice Department is investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russia
secrets.
Dylan Scott:
Rebecca Smithers:
Bill Gates orders £500m hydrogen-powered superyacht. [PS: This
article was subsequently removed. Evidently Gates did not buy this
yacht.] Related:
Rupert Neate:
Superyachts and private jets: spending of corrupt super-rich revealed
[2019-10-23].
- Alanna Vagianos:
Michael Bloomberg quietly rejoined clubs that largely exclude women,
minorities
Joyce White Vance:
If Trump is allowed to turn the Justice Department into a political
weapon, no one is safe.
Peter Wade:
Bloomberg said ending a racist housing practice caused financial
crisis.
Kimberly Wehle:
A conservative judge draws a line in the sand with the Trump
administration.
Savannah Wooten:
Trump's proposed budget is fuel for American militarism.
Matthew Yglesias:
Li Zhou:
The Senate just voted to check Trump's ability to take military action
against Iran. Have you noticed that when a president wants the
authorization to use military force, it only takes a bare majority,
but when Congress wants to limit a president's warmaking, it takes
two-thirds to override a presidential veto?
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Music Week
February archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 32759 [32712] rated (+47), 241 [230] unrated (+11).
Shortly after closing my last
Music Week, I looked at the featured jazz records on Napster and
noticed two volumes from Duke Ellington's Private Collection
series. These appeared on Saja in 10 CDs from 1987-89, and I had picked
up a few when I found them used. I figured I should play the ones I had
missed, and that got me looking at Napster's Ellingtons. I had probably
heard more records by Ellington than any other artist, but that still
left
a fair number unheard -- especially among the 44 Chronological
Classics volumes. As most of the latter were available, I started
working my way through the list, especially the stretch from 1931-39,
which Ellington's American labels have failed to keep in print. That
took me past my usual Monday deadline. I decided then to hold back
until I hit 1940, because I planned on writing a general introduction
to the series followed by notes and grades on each individual volume
(as I had with Private Collection.
Chronlogical Classics goes on to 1953, but I figured they
were less critical. That's not a judgment on the music, but because
nearly all of them were in print and graded elsewhere: see, especially,
the magnificent Never No Lament: The Blanton-Webster Band, which
covers 1940-42, The Indispensible Duke Ellington and the Small
Groups (1940-46), and the slightly lesser Black, Brown and
Beige (1944-1946). I picked up a few more titles along the way,
plus a couple of records by others which showed up in the Ellington
title search.
There are more I haven't gotten to. The big live chunks left are
the Carnegie Hall Concerts from 1943-48 and The Treasury
Shows from 1945-46 (25 volumes). There is also a fair amount of
live Ellington floating around, especially from the 1960s -- Pablo
picked up some of those, but we're still seeing occasional concerts
pop up on European labels. I won't venture to say how much of this
anyone actually needs, but aside from some redundancy, the A and A+
records listed above are really choice records. Nothing (other than
the Armstrong-Ellington Summit, which matches a previous A
graded package) in this week's many finds matches them, although the
1928-30 Chronological Classics overlap with some of my previous
picks (especially the 3-CD Early Ellington on Decca), 1938
Vol. 3 has some of the small group recording from The Great
Ellington Units, and Up in Duke's Workshop sounds like a
first draft of Latin American Suite. On the other hand, I ran
through the Chronological Classics very fast (almost always
just one play), and aside from the usual caveats about surface noise
and sequencing they all sounded pretty great to me.
Quite a bit of unpacking this week-plus, which came as a surprise
to me after a few lean weeks. I've let the 2020 releases pile up while
working on 2019, and barely touched them this week. But the Ellington
orgy did break me out of the rut of searching around for 2019 stragglers.
Also went the whole week without touching the
2019 EOY Aggregate. So I
guess I'm moving on. Still expect to pick up a few more Ellington
titles next week (playing The Great Paris Concert right now,
and it's sounding pretty great, indeed). My new year resolution is
to take 2020 easier. So far that's mostly involved starting each day
off with a piece of classic old jazz. I had, in fact, been playing
Early Ellington in the week before this kicked off, along with
Ben Webster's Cottontail, an ASV best-of named for his 1935
hit with Ellington.
A final personal note: I just heard today that my cousin Chloe
McCandlis died, at 94. She and her husband Paul moved from Arkansas
to Snohomish, WA before I was born, so I probably only saw her a
half-dozen times over the years. I don't remember the family's first
trip to Washington, but we returned for the Seattle World's Fair in
1962, which was the high point of my life well past that point. I
visited again, on my own, in 1984, and it totally changed my view
of my family -- for one thing, despite the distance, she probably
knew my mother better than any of my closer relatives (or maybe she
was just more open about it). I saw her a couple years ago. Despite
numerous physical ailments, she was in a very expansive mood, with
lots of stories about long ago. She no doubt knew many more, and
I could kick myself for not making more of an effort to keep close.
That memory is lost now. The inspiration remains.
New records reviewed this week:
Carol Albert: Stronger Now (2019 [2020], Cahara):
Pianist, sings some, ranges from luxe piano to easy listening pap.
B-
Lila Ammons: Genealogy (2019 [2020], Lila Ammons
Music): Jazz singer, granddaughter of boogie-woogie pianist Albert
Ammons, niece of saxophonist Gene Ammons. Songs here are mostly
by jazz composers (Silver, Monk, Ellington.
B+(**) [cd]
Ellen Edwards: A New York Session (2019 [2020],
Stonefire Music, EP): Singer-songwriter from Alabama, has a couple
previous CDs, this one just five tracks, 20:20. Jazz band, best
known are Randy Brecker (trumpet) and Jason Miles (B3, vibes,
and synthesizers), none remarkable.
B- [cd] [02-22]
Delfeayo Marsalis Uptown Jazz Orchestra: Jazz Party
(2019 [2020], Troubadour Jass): The trombone player in the New
Orlean family's band, tenth album since 1992, second with this
big band, where everything's a jazz party.
B+(**)
The Westerlies: Wherein Lies the Good (2018 [2020],
Westerlies): New York-based brass quartet, two each trumpets and
trombones, all originally from Seattle, first appeared on an album
with Wayne Horvitz, have another album I haven't heard. Beyond the
14:37 title piece (by Robin Holcomb), many short bits, some trad,
some filtered through the Golden Gate Quartet or Charles Ives.
B+(***)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Ronnie Lane: Just for a Moment: The Best of Ronnie Lane
(1973-97 [2019], UMC): Started out in Small Faces, solo career never as
famous as his bandmates although One for the Road (1976) was one
of my favorite albums ever. This sampler was culled from a completist
6-CD box and favors breadth over depth, finding some gems but most seem
minor compared to the two songs from his masterpiece.
B+(***)
Old music:
Louis Armstrong & Duke Ellington: The Great Summit: The
Master Takes (1961 [2000], Roulette): I've long owned the 1990
CD of The Complete Louis Armstrong & Duke Ellington Sessions,
so never bothered with this package: a new title with the same 17 cuts.
Ellington plays piano, and wrote (or co-wrote) all the songs, Armstrong
plays trumpet and sings, and brought the band: Trummy Young (trumpet),
Barney Bigard (clarinet), Mort Herbert (bass), Danny Barcelona (drums) --
Bigard played with Ellington before joining Armstrong's All-Stars, and
really stands out here. Armstrong amazes with his ability to slide his
voice around such sophisticated melodies.
A
Duke Ellington/Billy Strayhorn: Great Times! Piano Duets
(1950 [1989], Riverside/OJC): The original eight tracks (25:30), with
two pianos and bass, were released as a 10-inch LP in 1950. The CD adds
two more tracks with Strayhorn switching to celesta, and two trio cuts
with Ellington, Oscar Pettiford (cello), and Jo Jones (drums).
B+(*)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: A Drum Is a Woman
(1956 [1957], Columbia): Billy Strayhorn co-wrote this attempted
opera, where the book doesn't fit the music, and the music doesn't
fit all that neatly together either.
B-
Duke Ellington: At the Alhambra: Recorded in Paris, 1958
(1958 [2002], Pablo): After Noran Granz sold his Verve label interests
to megacorp Universal, he started Pablo in 1973, recruiting many of his
old favorites, starting with Oscar Peterson and Ella Fitzgerald. His
third released was one of Ellington's last, Duke's Big 4. Later
Pablo picked up several live tapes, including this one. This is basically
the band he took to Newport in 1956, starting with "Take the 'A' Train,"
running through a medley of oldies, sliding into "Jeep's Blues," and
widing up with an only slightly less rousing "Diminuendo and Crescendo
in Blue."
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: Featuring Paul Gonsalves
(1962 [1991], Fantasy/OJC): Gonsalves, from Massachusetts, parents Cape
Verdean, played tenor sax in the Count Basie and Dizzy Gillespie big bands
before replacing Ben Webster in Ellington's orchestra in 1950. He emerged
as a star with his astonishing 27-chorus solo in 1956 at Newport, and
remained with the band until he died in 1974, a few days before Ellington's
death. This was a free-wheeling blowing session, eight group standards
starting with "C-Jam Blues," not necessarily designed to feature tenor
sax but in the free-for-all Gonsalves often winds up on top. Sat in the
vaults until 1985, when someone realized it filled a niche -- or just
wanted a reminder of how hard Ellington could swing.
A-
Duke Ellington: The Duke: The Essential Collection: 1927-1962
(1927-62 [2000], Columbia/Legacy, 3CD): Released as a tall box in 1999
on the occasional of his centennial, with the more accurate title The
Columbia Years, given more sensible packaging here. The discs break
up into three discontinuous stretches: 1927-40, 1947-52, and 1956-62.
Ellington always kept several labels going, although RCA seemed to get
the best eras -- the best takes from 1927-30 (although the Deccas are
nearly as good, the Okehs sampled here and available on a 2-CD set,
The Okeh Ellington, coming in third); The Blanton-Webster
Band of 1939-42 and the "small groups" of the same period; late
masterpieces like The Far East Suite (1966) and And His Mother
Called Him Bill (1967) -- but Columbia's two stretches in the
1950s includes a few supreme records: Uptown (1947-52), At
Newport (1956), Blues in Orbit (1958-59). Columbia also seems
to have control of much of Ellington's neglected 1930s work, but has
kept them out of print (except for European bootlegs, Mosaic's 11-CD
2010 box, and rare samples on Columbia anthologies like this one).
The main value here is a first disc that starts to show off this
long-neglected oeuvre. The later discs are full of gems, but a same
size RCA compilation would blow them all away.
A-
Duke Ellington: In the Uncommon Market (1963 [1986],
Pablo): From one of the band's European tours, scant details on where
or when. The band tracks have some terrific moments, especially Paul
Gonsalves in "E.S.P." Ends wtih some rather funky piano trio.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: Soul Call (1966 [1999], Verve):
A live set from Juan-Les-Pins in France, originally released in 1967
(5 tracks, 37:50), expanded to 14 tracks (74:44) for the Verve Master
Edition reissue. The original album, still up front, picked out the
new music, with two 12-14-minute pieces ("La Plus Belle Africaine"
and "Skip Deep"). The extras recycle the songbook.
B+(**)
Duke Ellington/Boston Pops/Arthur Fiedler: The Duke at
Tanglewood (1966, RCA Victor Red Seal): In the late 1940s,
Ellington started writing longer works ("suites"), and started to
gain acclaim as America's greatest composer, as jazz started to be
touted as "America's classical music." So it was inevitable that
some classical music orchestra would invite Ellington to sit in on
a program of his tunes fleshed out with strings and tympani. And
you could probably have guessed it would be the Pops, their live
concert appearing on RCA's classical music imprint. I'm surprised
it works so well, but in retrospect that, too, seems inevitable.
B+(**)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: The Popular Duke Ellington
(1966 [1967], RCA Victor): Ten old songs (1927-1944), most recorded
hundreds (or even thousands) of times (I think I once decided that
"Mood Indigo" was the most covered popular song ever), plus one ("The
Twitch" that seems to have originated here. One generally frowns on
re-recording your old hits, but the march of technology and the
evolution of the band make this an exception.
A-
Duke Ellington: Solos, Duets and Trios (1932-67 [1990],
RCA Bluebird): Isolated solos both early and late, but most come from
the 1940s, centering on a batch of 1940 duets with ill-fated bassist Ray
Blanton (9 takes of 4 songs). Duke's a pretty good stride pianist, but
this is a mixed bag. Still, the Blanton tracks are pretty amazing.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: Berlin '65/Paris '67
(1965-67 [1997], Pablo): Previously unreleased concert performances,
released as part of Norman Granz's Jazz at the Philharmonic series.
Several marvelous pieces from The Far East Suite, as well as
old standards.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: 1969 All-Star White House Tribute to Duke
Ellington (1969 [2002], Blue Note): Sixteen names on the
cover, but Ellington was not only the subject here; he was listed
first among the contributors. My contempt for Richard Nixon is
almost boundless, but he played a little piano, and must have been
overjoyed to be able to sit down and tinkle the ivories alongside
the Duke. The occasion was Ellington's 70th birthday, and Nixon's
gift was a Presidential Medal of Freedom. The West Wing party
rolled on to 3 AM, the long list of names contributing (although
I don't have song-by-song credits) -- a few Ellington alumni like
Clark Terry and Louis Bellson (but not the Orchestra), plus stars
like Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Gerry Mulligan, JJ Johnson, Hank
Jones, Jim Hall, and Joe Williams.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: Duke Ellington's 70th Birthday Concert
(1969 [1995], Blue Note, 2CD): Actually two concerts from a tour in the
UK, about seven months after his 70th birthday (Nov. 25-26 vs. Apr. 29),
originally released in 1970 by Solid State in the US and United Artists
elsewhere. Still loving you madly.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington & His Orchestra: Up in Duke's Workshop
(1969-72 [1990], Pablo/OJC): Nine tracks from nine dates, with groups
ranging from 5 to 12 musicians, first released by Pablo in 1979. No
titles I recognize here, but the melodies remind me of his last wave
of great albums. Wild Bill Davis on organ is a special treat.
A-
Duke Ellington: Duke's Big 4 (1973 [1974], Pablo):
One of his last albums, the first actually released by Norman Granz's
Pablo (which later picked up a fair amount of archive material).
Quartet with Joe Pass (guitar), Ray Brown (bass), and Louie Bellson
(drums). Kind of lightweight, but Pass always liked it airy.
B+(**)
Duke Ellington: The Private Collection (1956-72
[1989], Saja, 10CD): Previously unreleased tapes from the family vault,
some live, most studio, released by LMR or its successor Saja 1987-89,
and later reissued by Kaz. I picked up several of the Saja discs back
in the day, graded them as follows, and jumped at the opportunity to
hear more on Napster:
- Volume One: Studio Sessions, Chicago, 1956 (1956 [1987], Saja): A-
- Volume Three: Studio Sessions, New York (1962 [1988], Saja): B+
- Volume Four: Studio Sessions, New ork, 1963 (1963 [1988], Saja): B+
- Volume Five: The Suites, New York, 1968 & 1970 (1968-70 [1988], Saja): A-
- Volume Nine: Studio Sessions, New York, 1968 (1968 [1989], Saja): B+
Duke Ellington: The Private Collection, Volume Two: Dance
Concerts, California, 1958 (1958 [1987], Saja): Ellington
responded to the eclipse of the big band era by trying his hand at
fancier things (suites and such), but still played the occasional
dance hall, trotting out his hits, and they're having a good time
here. Ozzie Bailey sings a couple, and they're just fine.
A-
Duke Ellington: The Private Collection, Volume Six: Dance
Dates, California, 1958 (1958 [1989], Saja): The brassy dance
numbers from the start don't seem like anything special, but they get
a lot more interesting at/after the break, when they slow it down
(e.g., "Mood Indigo").
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: The Private Collection, Volume Seven: Studio
Sessions, 1957 & 1962 (1957-62 [1989], Saja): The big band
is in fine form here, especially on their classics, most notably a
rousing new "Cottontail."
B+(***)
Duke Ellington: The Private Collection, Volume Eight: Studio
Sessions, 1957, 1965, 1966, 1967, San Francisco, Chicago, New York
(1957-67 [1989], Saja):
B+(**)
Duke Ellington: The Chronological Duke Ellington and His
Orchestra (1924-1953, Classics): A French label which has
been picking off American jazz titles as they clear Europe's 50-year
copyright law -- although they slowed down after 2000, and haven't
released anything since 2008. They've usually digitized well-worn
copies, so the sound often leaves much to be desired. Napster lists
some of these titles as Reborn Records, using modified artwork. One
presumes they've undergone further noise reduction, but I can't say
definitively. For Ellington, these start with 1924-1927 and
extend to 1953 (44 CDs). I've previously heard and rated:
- Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1937 (1937, Classics) B+
- Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1937, Vol. 2 (1937, Classics) A-
I hoped to catch up everything to 1940, but couldn't find 1924-1927
(Classics 539), 1935-1936 (659), 1938-1939 (747), or 1939
Vol. 2 (780). I tried to get by with a single play per CD, which made
it hard to make fine distinctions -- not that there were many to make. Most
critics consider 1927-1930 and 1940-1942 to be golden periods, and they're
certainly peaks, but there are no slough periods. The main complaints I had
were surface noise and the arbitrariness of the chronological sequencing,
with small groups and backup jobs for vocal groups thrown into the mix.
From 1940 on, the Classics series is less useful, as Ellington's studio
recordings have been kept reliably in print by RCA (in two 3-CD sets) and
later labels. Perhaps I'll check out those compilations later, but for
now 1940 seemed like a good cut-off point.
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1927-1928 (1927-28
[1990], Classics): This is where Ellington hits his stride, coining
such classics as "East St. Louis Toodoe-Oo" and "Jubilee Stomp." The
only downsides are redundancy and surface noise -- endemic to this
whole series.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1928 (1928 [1990],
Classics): With Johnny Hodges, he's really developing a consistent
sound, despite billing various groups, like Lonnie Johnson's Harlem
Footwarmers. Obviously, the big one here is "The Mooche," with four
takes.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1928-1929 (1928-29
[1990], Classics): A prime period, with Bubber Miley on trumpet and
Barney Bigard or Johnny Hodges on clarinet, everything bright and
cheery, from "Tiger Rag" to "Flaming Youth" to "Diga Diga Doo," even
"Rent Party Blues."
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1929 (1929 [1991],
Classics): A hot band starting to swing, still on their jungle thing,
the one disturbing thing is "A Nite at the Cotton Club," where the
announcer insists on calling him "Dukey."
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1929-1930 (1929-30
[1991], Classics): Sixth volume, starts with "Jungle Jamboree," with
three later songs attributed to The Jungle Band, nine more to Duke
Ellington and His Cotton Club Orchestra. Dancefloor singles, close
to 3:00 each, many terrific, sound so-so.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1930 (1930 [1991],
Classics): While Bubber Miley defined Ellington's 1927-29 band, he
is hardly missed here, with Cootie Williams taking over on trumpet,
and the saxophones and trombones gaining stature. Some remakes of
classics (especially "The Mooche"), everything first rate.
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1930, Volume 2 (1930
[1991], Classics): A big year for Ellington, recording as the Jungle Band,
the Harlem Footwarmers, and Mills' Ten Black Berries as well as under his
own name. Mostly upbeat stompers, including three takes of "Ring Dem Bells,"
but also a gorgeous little piece initially called "Dreamy Blues" -- you
know it as "Mood Indigo."
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1930-1931 (1930-31
[1991], Classics): Another good run but more than the usual redundancy,
with three takes of "Rockin' in Rhythm," more "Creole Rhapsody" and
"Mood Indigo," and forgettable vocals by Billy Sith, Sid Garry, Chick
Bullock, and others I've already forgotten.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1931-1932 (1931-32
[1991], Classics): Starts with the band backing Earl Jackson on "Is
That Religion?" -- then resets the mood with two helpings of "Creole
Rapsody." Three-minute singles predominate, but you also get two
7-minute medleys of signature pieces, and a first release of "It
Don't Mean a Thing (If It Ain't Got That Swing)."
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1932-1933 (1932-33
1992], Classics): Leans more toward vocal pieces, with Adelaide Hall,
the Mills Brothers' "Diga Diga Doo" a hit, Ray Mitchell's vocal on
"Star" very touching, Ethel Waters as fine as you'd expect.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1933 (1933 [1992],
Classics): Two takes of "Sophisticated Lady," which first appeared the
year before, plus a lot of upbeat fare, including a rousing "Ain't
Misbehavin'." Also an interview snippet, apparently from a UK tour.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1933-1935 (1933-35
[1992], Classics): Most famous new song here is "Solitude"; least may
be "Rude Interlude" -- in the previous interview he mentiond wanting
to write a "Rude" song after someone misheard his recent his as "Rude
Indigo." More vocals than usual: Louis Bacon (2), Ivie Anderson (3),
Mae West.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1936-1937 (1936-37
[1992], Classics): Starts with Ivie Anderson singing. Ben Webster joins
on a couple of dates. The big band swings, but the Barney Bigard small
group, (7-pieces, with Ellington on piano) is even hotter. Two cuts are
piano solos, and the mix of "Mood Indigo and Solitude" is especially
delectable.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1938 (1938 [1993],
Classics): More than half of the 23 cuts come from "small groups" led
by Barney Bigard, Cootie Williams, or Johnny Hodges ("Jeep's Blues").
Hodges get the vocal version of "I Let a Song Go Out of My Heart", but
the band's instrumental is even better.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1938 Vol. 2 (1938
[1993], Classics): Again, half "small groups" (Cootie Williams, Johnny
Hodges), the rest by His Famous Orchestra, half with vocals, most often
Ivie Anderson, bringing the superb instrumentals back to earth.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1938 Vol. 3 (1938
[1993], Classics): Ellington recorded more in 1938 than any year since
1930 (probably to date), at least if you count the Cootie Williams and
Johnny Hodges small groups (10 of 22 cuts here). Hodges is superb here,
especially on his own cuts ("The Jeep Is Jumpin'," "Hodge Podge,"
"Wanderlust").
A-
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1939 (1939 [1994],
Classics): Another very productive year, this covering March to June,
with superb small groups led by Bigard and Hodges and a date backing
a vocal group, the Quintones, on a couple of novelty numbers.
B+(***)
Duke Ellington and His Orchestra: 1939-1940 (1939-40
[1993], Classics): From October to February, only seven tracks with
His Famous Orchestra, most of the rest small groups led by Barney
Bigard and Cootie Williams, plus a bit of solo piano and two duets
with new bassist Jimmy Blanton. Ben Webster rejoins in February,
kicking off Ellington's most legendary band.
B+(***)
Vienna Art Orchestra: Duke Ellington's Sound of Love, Vol. 2:
Live at Porgy & Bess, Vienna
(2003, EmArcy): Big band, founded by Mathias Rüegg in 1977, originally
to play his own postmodernist compositions, but over the years they've
delved into a wide range of jazz and classical composers, adding their
own distinctively avant touches. Their previous Ellington volume came
out in 2000. Highpoint here is a "Dimuendo and Crescendo in Blue" that's
messier than the Newport version but every bit as exciting (although no
one dares go after Cat Anderson's high notes).
A-
Ben Webster: Plays Duke Ellington (1967-71 [2002],
Storyville): Tenor saxophonist, played with Bennie Moten in 1932,
moved to New York and played occasionally with Ellington from 1935,
becoming a regular 1940-43, and he kept some of his major pieces
in his songbook (especially "Cottontail"). This isn't a tribute,
but was stitched together from several sessions, mostly fast jams
but also a gorgeous "Satin Doll," and closes with a strong blues
vocal (not sure who).
A-
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Kenny Barron/Dave Holland Trio Featuring Johnathan Blake: Without Deception (Dare2) [03-06]
- Gerald Beckett: Mood (Summit)
- Benjamin Boone With the Ghana Jazz Collective: Joy (Origin) [03-20]
- Calle Loiza Jazz Project: There Will Never Be Another You (self-released)
- The Coachella Valley Trio: Mid Century Modern (DMAC)
- Sarah Elgeti Quartet With Friends: Dawn Comes Quietly (Gateway Music) [02-21]
- Nick Finzer: Cast of Characters (Outside In Music) [02-28]
- Al Gold: Al Gold's Paradise (self-released) [03-06]
- Christopher Icasiano: Provinces (Origin) [02-21]
- Brent Jensen: The Sound of a Dry Martini: Remembering Paul Desmond (2002, Origin) [02-21]
- Mike McGinniss/Elias Bailey/Vinnie Sperrazza: Time Is Thicker (Open Stream Music)
- New Stories: Speakin' Out (2019 [2020], Origin) [02-21]
- Gloria Reuben & Marty Ashby: For All We Know (MCG Jazz) [02-14]
- Reverso [Frank Woeste/Vincent Courtois/Ryan Keberle]: The Melodic Line (Out Note) [02-14]
- RJ & the Assignment: Hybrid Harmony (self-released)
- The United States Air Force Band Airmen of Note: Air Power! (self-released)
- Torbjörn Zetterberg & Den Stora Fragan: Are You Happy (Moserobie)
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, February 9, 2020
Weekend Roundup
Skipped a week because I was working on
music stuff,
so this week's links go back further than usual, but much of the
previous week was absorbed in speculation about Iowa and Trump's
impeachment trial, which became obsolete the moment the votes were
counted (or are finally counted; see Riley Beggin:
Final Iowa caucuses results expected just before New Hampshire begins
voting). Trump was, of course, not convicted, the vote 48-52, with
Mitt Romney the only Senator to break party ranks. This, and his own
holier-than-thou explanation, occasioned pieces heaping undeserved
praise or wrath on Romney, none of which mentioned the most obvious
point: Trump's following among Republicans is significantly weaker
in Utah than in any other state, probably because Utah is uniquely
insulated from the fears he preys upon.
The Iowa caucuses were a huge embarrassment for the Democratic
Party's professional elites, who came up with novel ways to avoid
reporting unpleasant news (that Sanders won the popular vote), and
reminded us that Republicans aren't the only party willing to use
tricks (in this case "State Delegate Equivalents") to steal an
election (allowing Buttigieg to claim a Trumpian victory, although
even there, with still incomplete results, the margin is a razor
thin 564-562; Sanders led the first-found popular vote 24.75% to
21.29%, followed by Warren 18.44%, Biden 14.95%, Klobuchar 12.73%,
Yang 5.00%, Steyer 1.75%, Gabbard 0.19%, Bloomberg 0.12%, Bennet
0.09%, Patrick 0.03%, Delaney 0.01% [10 votes]). Lots of articles
this week dredging up old standy complaints about Iowa's premier
spot in presidential campaigns, including generic complaints about
caucuses, and even more about Iowa.
New Hampshire will vote on Tuesday. Recent polling: Anya van
Wagtendonk:
Sanders leads in New Hampshire, but half of voters remain uncommitted --
subhed amends that to 30%. Buttigieg seems to be in 2nd place now (21%,
behind 28% for Sanders), followed by Biden (11%), Warren (9%), Gabbard
(6%), Klobuchar (5%), Yang and Steyer (3%), with Bloomberg (not on
ballot) at 2%. The Democrats had another debate last week, resulting
in the usual winners-and-losers pieces, none of which caught my eye
below. (If you really want one, try
Vox, which had Klobuchar a winner and Biden a loser.)
Meanwhile, Trump gave his State of the Union address, on the even
of his "acquittal." It read (link below) more like his campaign stump
speech, at least the one he'd give if he didn't wander off script, and
Republicans in the audience tried to turn the event into a campaign
rally, even at one point chanting "four more years" (but at least I
haven't seen any reports of "lock her up"), and the fact that half of
the audience were Democrats kept the chemistry down (and added a few
boos and a couple of walkouts). Of course, the content got lost in
the dramatics, especially Trump's refusal to shake Nancy Pelosi's
hand on entering, and her ripping up his speech afterwards. It all
led pundits and partisans to offer sermons on civility, but Trump
had been absolutely vicious toward Pelosi ever since she got behind
impeachment. But what the exchange reminded me most of was a story
about Casey Stengel, where he artfully dodged an interview after a
loss by making obscene gestures the media couldn't broadcast. By
ripping up Trump's speech, Pelosi signaled there was nothing but
lies and contempt there, more succinctly than any of the official
party responders could possibly do.
Some Republican flaks claim that last week was one of Trump's
best ever, and they can point to a trivial uptick in Trump's
approval rating (43.8% at
538). It's clear now that the Senate's non-trial
didn't move anyone, but while it was tedious and overwrought as it
happened, it will be remembered differently. Democrats will remember it
as a valiant attempt to do something about a president has repeatedly
abused his office and violated his oath to support the Constitution and
the laws of the land, which was thwarted not by facts or reason but by
cynical partisan solidarity, making clear that the Republican members of
Congress are fully complicit in Trump's crimes. That's something they
can campaign on this fall.
Trump celebrated his "acquittal" with a series of extremely boorish
public appearances (some noted below). I've gotten to where it's hard
for Trump to shock me, but his is the most disgusting performance I've
ever seen by a public figure. I've long maintained that Trump himself
isn't nearly as dangerous or despicable as the orthodox Republicans
he surrounds himself with, but I may have to revise my view. I've long
believed that the swing vote in the 2020 election will turn on those
Americans who don't particularly object to Trump's policies but decide
that his personal behavior is too embarrassing to tolerate further.
This week has provided plenty for them to think about.
The only issue below I tried to group links under was the Kushner
"deal of the century," partly because they separate out easily enough.
Trump issues, Democrat issues, they're all over the place.
Some scattered links this week:
Zeeshan Aleem:
Trump's State of the Union suggests he's worried about Bernie
Sanders.
Robert P Baird:
The prosecution of President Donald Trump.
Natylie Baldwin:
Obama Russia adviser on cold war liberals: Interview with James
Carden, who previously (2019-12-30) wrote
Meet the cold war liberals, where he suggests FDR's Good Neighbor
Policy as a way out of America's cold war rut.
Zack Beauchamp:
Peter Beinart:
Impeachment hurt somebody. It wasn't Trump. "In the end, the president
succeeded in doing precisely what he wanted in the first place: tarring a
leading Democratic rival."
Julia Belluz:
9 questions about the coronavirus outbreak, answered.
Katelyn Burns:
Democratic candidates aren't happy about new debate rules that seem
to benefit Bloomberg. No "seem" about it. Donors aren't necessarily
a good metric, but dropping it opens the door to billionaire egotists
like Bloomberg to scam polls through massive ad buys, and reaffirms
the DNC's commitment to oligarchy. The DNC may have had an impossible
and thankless job in managing the debates, but once again they've come
out looking hapless and more than a little corrupt.
Jonathan Chait:
Now Trump is charging Nancy Pelosi with fake crimes, too.
If you think it looks bad for mainstream Democrats now, just wait.
I realize they're not happy with any of their candidates, but could
that possibly have something to do with: Their positions? Their track
record of promising progressive reform and delivering nothing? Bad as
it seems, I can't imagine any scenario looking worse for them this year
than having their perfect candidate, Hillary Clinton, lose to Trump in
2016.
Impeachment exposed President Trump's authoritarian ambitions.
Trump baffled why African-Americans don't want to vote for him: "Maybe
giving Rush Limbaugh another medal will fix it."
Trump speech cites sole triumph: Rebranding Obama's economy as his
own.
Trump attacks John Bolton as desperate loser who nearly destroyed the
planet. A rare occasion of Trump speaking truth, although Bolton
was so stuck in his obsessions for so long you have to wonder about
Trump's command of the vetting process.
Running Bernie Sanders against Trump would be an act of insanity.
Wait! Isn't the stock definition of insanity doing the same thing
over and over again while expecting a different result? Running the
only person in America who ever lost a general election to Trump a
second time would be insane. Wouldn't it be saner to nominate a very
different candidate? Sanders may not be perfectly tailored, but he
has some real strengths that are hard to find in other candidates,
notably principles and integrity. In a Trump vs. Sanders election,
Trump has already made it clear that he's going to practice nonstop
red-baiting: an old song that for most non-Republicans has worn thin
enough to be easily dismissed. Against anyone else, Trump is going
to harp on the supposed corruption and perfidy of the Democrats --
points that still disturb most Americans, and are likely to hurt even
where grossly unfair.
Joan Coaston:
The Iowa Republican caucuses you didn't know where happening, explained.
I have a pretty low opinion of Republicans these days, but I'm still a
bit surprised that no serious candidate emerged to register an anti-Trump
protest vote in the Republican primaries. There are still a few "never
Trump" pundits flopping around, and there are some obvious names who seem
to be biding their time, figuring a Trump debacle in 2020 will give them
a springboard for redeeming the party in 2024 (Kasich, Ryan, Romney, with
Rubio trying to have it both ways). But viability in the Republican Party
almost exclusively depends on the blessing of billionaire donors -- Newt
Gingrich explained his loss to Romney: "he had five billionaires, and
I only had one" -- and clearly none of them came up with a favorable
cost/benefit analysis. That left Bill Weld and Joe Walsh as the only
candidates to solicit votes in Iowa, and all they could do was 1.54% and
1.31% respectively. Hard to know whether the media consciously ignored
them to leave Trump a clear path, or just didn't notice in the first
place. Even this article omitted Trump's actual vote, although you can
figure out it was close to 97%. [PS: Walsh has since dropped out. See
Benjamin Hart:
Joe Walsh will not be the next President of the United States.
Sean Collins:
Trump's Super Bowl interview was 8 minutes of pettiness and empty
braggadocio.
McKay Coppins:
The billion-dollar disinformation campaign to reelect the president.
Including quite a bit about Trump's internet czar, Brad Parscale -- now
campaign manager, which tells you something about how and where the
campaign will be fought.
Neta C Crawford:
The Iraq War has cost the US nearly $2 trillion . . . and counting,
on track to exceeding the estimate in the 2008 book by Joseph Stiglitz
and Linda Bilmes, The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of
the Iraq Conflict.
Chas Danner:
David Dayen:
Ryan Devereaux:
Trump is blowing up a National Monument in Arizona to make way for the
border wall: Organ Pipe Cactus NM.
Eliza Relman/Lauren Frias:
Trump supporters intentionally swarmed the Iowa caucus phone lines to
delay the results: News reports that the Iowa caucus wasn't hacked
were wrong. What this story shows is that Nixon's tricksters are back
in force (even with Roger Stone locked up).
Matt Ford:
The empire strikes back: "With impeachment behind him, Trump is already
steering his cruel reign in a darker direction." Starts by quoting Bill
Clinton after his impeachment acquittal, saying "I want to say again to
the American people how profoundly sorry I am for what I said and did to
trigger these events and the great burden they have imposed on Congress
and on the American people." Trump, by contrast, makes Clinton look like
the epitome of class and grace:
It's hard to imagine how President Donald Trump could have done things
more differently in his own address on Thursday. Speaking to a motley
crowd of White House aides, Cabinet officials, and congressional allies,
the president bounced between gratitude for his most ardent supporters
and anger toward his perceived enemies. "It was evil, it was corrupt,
it was dirty cops," he seethed, referring to years of investigations
into his misconduct. Now that Trump will no longer face consequences
for his actions, the president and his allies are eager to inflict them
upon everyone else.
Adam Gopnik:
Thirteen (well, ten) ways of looking at impeachment and acquittal:
Actually, they all strike me as bullshit:
- Impeachment was, despite it all, essential.
- Yes, but Trump won, and the consequences are terrifying.
- Actually, Trump won, but it's trivial.
- And you know what? Actually, Trump lost.
- Adam Schiff's eloquence will always be remembered.
- And so will Romney's courage.
- There was a truly shocking collapse of conscience.
- It's over, and Trump will win.
- It's not over, and Trump will lose.
- History has its eyes on you.
- History is happening.
The most plausible is 3 -- not so much that Trump won as that his
win was trivial. Trump's big win was that he didn't get charged with
corruption, which is his calling card, or with lying, which he does
nearly every time he opens his mouth. This didn't happen because it
would have involved more work, and it's not something Democrats are
squeaky clean on. Plus, many Democrats still think Russia is the
silver bullet, and those Democrats were the ones that unified the
party on impeachment. Unfortunately, they also unified Republicans
in defense, ensuring defeat. Which brings me back to what I think
of as a fundamental principle: never prosecute someone you have no
chance of convicting. Granted, it's tempting with someone you really
want to make squirm, and it did have the effect of making Trump (and
ultimately the Republican Senate) look bad. Still, it's not something
you want to make a habit of.
Courtney Hagle/John Kerr:
After his acquittal, Fox goes all in on the sycophantic praise of Donald
Trump. Related: Rob Savillo:
Fox & Friends reported on Pelosi ripping up her copy of the State of
the Union 55 times more than actual lies from Trump's speech.
Rebecca Heilweil:
Sean Illing:
"Flood the zone with shit": How misinformation overwhelmed our
democracy.
For most of recent history, the goal of propaganda was to reinforce
a consistent narrative. But zone-flooding takes a different approach:
It seeks to disorient audiences with an avalanche of competing stories.
And it produces a certain nihilism in which people are so skeptical
about the possibility of finding the truth that they give up the search.
The fact that 60 percent of Americans say they encounter conflicting
reports about the same event is an example of what I mean. In the face
of such confusion, it's not surprising that less than half the country
trusts what they read in the press.
"We're losing our damn minds": James Carville unloads on the Democratic
Party: Interview with the crusty Clinton strategist, mostly a rant
against the "democratic wing of the Democratic Party," but I'm reading
his complaints about the farthest reaches in their platform as a gripe
about how "moderate" Democrats haven't been able to articulate practical
intermediate steps and show how they'd really be positive steps. I doubt
that's really fair, but the media would rather see Democrats fight than
find fertile common ground, so what gets broadcast are the "Republican
talking points" the centrists seem to embrace. So I don't disagree with
his pull quote: "The fate of the world depends on the Democratic Party
getting its shit together and winning in November."
Umair Irfan:
Tree planting is Trump's politically safe new climate plan.
Jake Johnson:
'No better distillation of Washington': Democrats and GOP join Trump in
standing ovation for failed Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaidó.
Sarah Jones:
Ed Kilgore:
How much did Iowa slow Joe's roll? By the way, I counted 33 Kilgore
posts since last Roundup, and this is the only one I thought worth
mentioning. A lot of them have very short shelf lives; e.g., before
this one, there was: In Iowa, a collision of campaigns before the
caucuses; Two campaigns on the brink in Iowa (Warren and Buttigieg);
How do the Iowa caucuses work?; In Iowa on caucus night: the view
from the ground; The mourning after in Iowa.
Catherine Kim:
Trump's criminal justice record is more complicated than he claims.
John Delaney's been running for president since 2017 -- and it's finally
come to an end. When the first batch of Iowa voting numbers came in,
I was amused to find that Delaney's first-round vote totals were exactly
0. Latest figures I've seen had him up to 10, but you still need a lot
of digits to turn that into a percentage. So, yeah, he's toast, and
should hang it up. The article spends a lot of time on his "simple"
health care plan, and it's not bad -- or wouldn't be if he had only
framed it as a first step toward the sort of comprehensive universal
coverage plan Sanders has proposed. But he didn't campaign like that.
Rather, he spent all his time attacking the left, winding up with no
solutions and no hope. Makes you wonder why he bothered to run in the
first place.
Jen Kirby:
Bonnie Kristian:
Why Trump can't believe his opponents' prayers. So this is what
happened when Trump took his victory tour to the National Prayer
Breakfast in DC. I'm sympathetic to people who regard Trump as a
piss-poor specimen of a Christian, but empirically speaking, I've
noticed that Christians (at least the hard-scrabble Protestants
I grew up with and have known since childhood) easily divide into
two camps: one that loves their neighbors and sincerely tries to
help them through their troubles, and another who only invoke God
to smite down their neighbors and consign them to hell. In his
introductory remarks, Arthur Brooks made a pitch to the former.
Then Trump came on, and replied: "Arthur, I don't know if I agree
with you, and I don't know if Arthur's gonna like what I've got to
say." They he started laying into his enemies (especially the ones
who say, "I pray for you").
Paul Krugman:
Robert Kuttner:
Was impeachment a mistake? He says no, but his analysis suggests
we won't know until the Senate is decided in November.
Nina Lakhani:
Hundreds of Salvadorans deported by US were killed or abused, report
reveals. Related: William Wheeler:
How the US helped create El Salvador's bloody gang war.
Eric Levitz:
Dara Lind:
"Women to one side, men to the other": How the Border Patrol's new powers
and old carelessness separated a family.
Erik Loomis:
What are you going to do when Bernie wins the nomination? The
question, of course, is only raised due to the extreme vitriol of
anti-Bernie hysteria among the elite tier of self-proclaimed "moderate
Democrats." The fact is that those who can't "Deal. With. It." will
be worse than "as bad as any Nader voter" (he's trying to hit them
where they hurt). Refusing to support the Democratic nominee if it's
Bernie is an admission that you never cared about progress or justice
in the first place -- that the repeated failures of recent Democratic
regimes were nothing more than bad faith (as opposed to conflicted
interests, fear, stupidity, and ineptness). For examples of vitriol,
see the comments. "I think Bernie is an increasingly bitter old man
who does not play well with others" is relatively mild and laughable.
Even more deranged:
I didn't vote for the fascist and I'm not voting for the Communist
either. Bernie has spent his entire existence undermining Democrats
and will not be rewarded for getting Trump installed. We can vote
down ballot for actual Democrats. There will be no forgiveness for
what the deranged old coot and his bros have done to the working
class. Not to mention, his voting record is fairly despicable. He's
no different than Trump. F him and his ratferking teabagging psychos
as well.
In what universe is a person with so much fear and loathing not
already a Trump disciple?
German Lopez:
Democrats have good plans to tackle the opioid epidemic. They should talk
about them.
Amanda Marcotte:
Voting to acquit this noxious criminal is the point of no return for the
Republican Party. I think Republicans crossed that point long ago, but
it's hard to pin down one point. One might be the "Hastert rule," by which
the far right could veto any moderate deals the House Republican leadership
might entertain, and McConnell's 2009 decision to use the filibuster to
block all bills by Democrats. On the other hand, Republican solidarity
dates back at least to the fight against Clinton's health care reform,
and further back to the defense of the Clarence Thomas nomination to the
Supreme Court (who, you may recall, was a pretty noxious pick). [Also
see note on Marcotte below.]
Daniel Markovits:
How McKinsey destroyed the middle class: "Technocratic management,
no matter how brilliant, cannot unwind structural inequalities."
Buttigieg worked for McKinsey, although to be fair, he was but a
small cog in their vast machinery.
David Masciotra:
America's fatal flaw: The founders assumed our leaders would have some
basic decency. I'm not sure that's true: otherwise, why would they
have concocted such an elaborate system of checks and balances to make
impossible any real concentration of power? And why would they take
care to proscribe titles, emoluments, bribes, and other high crimes?
On the other hand, decency is a pretty low bar, one that Trump uniquely
seems to have no claim to. More importantly, the founders didn't
anticipate political parties, and they didn't expect the president to
have anywhere near the broad powers of modern presidents. Perhaps they
were naive in authorizing as much power as they did, expecting George
Washington to wield that power responsibly, setting an example others
might emulate. The only thing Trump and Washington have in common is
exceptional wealth, but Washington also had a long record of public
service, and took great pains to avoid any suspicion of corruption.
Trump, well, could hardly be more opposite.
Trump's real base isn't the famous "white working class" -- it's the
billionaire class.
Laura McGann:
Casey Michel:
How the US became the center of global kleptocracy. "For the world's
warlords, criminals, and autocrats, there's no gift finer than an
anonymous American shell company."
Ian Millhiser:
The Senate's decision to acquit Trump is even less democratic than you
think: "The 48 senators who voted to remove Trump represent 53
percent of the nation."
Mitt Romney just did something that literally no senator has ever done
before: "Before this day, no senator has ever voted to remove a
president of the same party from office." Points out that all nine
Democrats in the Senate voted to acquit Andrew Johnson (Johnson was
not technically a Democrat when he was elected vice-president in 1864,
but by impeachment time the few Democrats left in Congress allied with
him against the "Radical Republicans"). I was thinking there had been
some breaks against Clinton
(Joe
Lieberman?), but
a check shows not. On the other hand, 4 Republicans voted not guilty
on the obstruction of justice charge (John Chafee, Susan Collins, Olympia
Snowe, Arlen Specter), and 5 more on the perjury article (Slade Gorton,
Richard Shelby, Ted Stevens, Fred Thompson, John Warner). The votes to
convict Clinton failed 50-50 and 45-55. Still, not enough of a sample to
make Romney's apostasy stand out. One can argue that the case against
Trump fared better relative to party standing than the strongest charge
against Clinton did (+1 vs. -4), and Romney's vote helped there. On the
other hand, the raw vote (48-52) fell short of the previous 50-50.
The biggest lie in Trump's State of the Union speech: "Trump wants
people who depend on Obamacare to relax. They do so at great peril."
What Trump has done to the courts, explained.
Rani Molla:
Why your free software is never free: "If you're not paying for the
product, you are the product." He has a point, but it's not about
free software,
a category which includes the operating system I'm using (Linux), the
software distribution (Xubuntu), the editor I'm typing into (GNU emacs),
the web server I'm distributing my writing over (Apache), or the browser
I used to view it (Firefox), or the hundreds of other programs that fill
role and do tasks in my digital universe. I paid $0 for all of them, and
expect to pay $0 every time I update them. And while I rarely do so, I
can in nearly every case download the source code to these programs,
fix bugs, add features, and redistribute my changes to the world, who
will also pay $0 for my contributions. (The few exceptions usually have
to do with proprietary hardware or restricted file formats for media
and "digital rights" policing. While these also cost me $0, they aren't
free software, because I can't download, modify, and redistribute the
source code. Sometimes such programs are referred to as freeware, but
most such programs are distributed free in hopes of getting tip income
and/or as demos for pricier product upgrades.) What Molla's talking
about is something else: proprietary software that you don't have to
pay directly for, but which collect data on you that the that the
vendor can monetize, often at you expense. Google has a whole suite
of tools like that, while Facebook offers a one-size-fits-all virtual
world meant to monopolize all your time and run your life. Before
2000, when it ate my job at SCO, free software seemed like the next
big thing, promising a future where software was freed from ulterior
motives of corporate control. (Having worked in the software business
for 20 years, I happened to know a lot about how that worked.) Since
then, these new business models of capture, control, and manipulation
have taken root, to the point where someone like Molla can pretend
no other world was ever possible. But really free software is still
being developed, and is available if you know where to look, and what
to do (although, frankly, it's a lot easier to use now than it was
when I got started).
Sara Morrison:
The Iowa caucus smartphone app disaster, explained.
Nicole Narea:
Ari Natter:
Trump withholding $823 million for clean energy, Democrats say.
Ella Nilsen:
The Iowa caucuses have a big accessibility problem. And therefore,
turnout is low, and possibly skewed. For instance, in 2016, turnout
was just 15.7%, vs. 52% for the New Hampshire primary. [PS: From a
tweet, Iowa Democratic turnout this year was up 5,146 from 2016 (up
3.0%), but way down from 2008 (63,436 votes, 26.5%).
Anna North:
Pelosi's State of the Union response: Rip up Trump's speech.
Osita Nwanevu:
History will remember Democrats' timidity, too. The main thing I
fault the impeachment effort for is the failure to bring additional
charges, specifically on charges Republicans might find it even more
embarrassing to vote against: Trump's self-dealing corruption; his
many abuses of executive powers to keep his administration from
enforcing the law (e.g., on the environment) or for overstepping
the law (e.g., on refugees), and those policy links to corruption;
his refusal to respect Congressional resolutions limiting his war
powers (again, no doubt linked to corruption).
Trump has never looked more comfortable as a demagogue: "The president's
State of the Union previewed his reelection themes: Socialism and health
care and socialism and xenophobia and socialism."
Alex Pareene:
Democrats embrace the grift: "The decidedly Trumpian nonprofit behind
the Iowa app debacle."
Jake Pearson/Anand Tumurtogoo:
Donald Trump Jr went to Mongolia, got special treatment from the government
and killed an endangered sheep.
Brianne Pfannenstiel:
Iowa caucus 2020: Inside the Iowa Democratic Party's 'boiler room,' where
'hell' preceded the results catastrophe.
Andrew Prokop:
Iowa Democratic caucuses: Live results: Like all similar pages,
their ambitions foiled by the Iowa Democratic Party, but as of Feb.
7, 4:38 am, they claimed to have 99.5% reporting, with Pete Buttigieg
2 State Delegate Equivalents ahead of Bernie Sanders, and Sanders
leading Buttigieg in the Round 1 popular vote 24.75% to 21.29%,
followed by Elizabeth Warren (18.44%), Joe Biden (14.95%), Amy
Klobuchar (12.73%), Andrew Yang (5.00%), and Tom Steyer (1.75%). In
the second round, where "non-viable candidates" (everyone from Biden
down, with Yang hit hardest) faded and "lesser evilism" kicked into
consideration, Buttigieg and Warren gained some ground, but still
trailed Sanders. I also looked at similar pages from
The Washington Post and
The New York Times, which have some additional analysis, but make
it harder to find raw vote numbers. For another weird wrinkle, see
Nathaniel Rakich:
Satellite caucuses give a surprise boost to Sanders in Iowa.
Frank Rich:
Iowa is just the latest chapter in a rolling Democratic calamity.
David Roberts:
With impeachment, America's epistemic crisis has arrived: Originally
published in November 2019, updated here.
New conservative climate plans are neither conservative nor climate
plans: "They are mainly designed to protect fossil fuels." I don't
see any point in today's right-wingers aren't true conservatives, given
that the only consistent aim of "conservatives" has been to defend and
increase the privileges and power of those already rich and powerful.
Of course, prominent among "conservatives" are those heavily invested
in fossil fuels, but you can chalk that up to self-interest, and their
fellow travelers to [upper] class consciousness. And sure, they've most
often tried to advance their efforts through fraud and corruption. It's
not as if an appeal to reason would help them.
Nathan J Robinson:
The failure of Democratic opposition: "The Democratic party establishment
have shown they are incapable of taking on Trump. They are assuring his
reelection." I get the point about Democrats not putting together a story
credible enough to convince low information/interest voters to counter
Trump's. But a big part of that is that the media isn't listening to the
narratives that various candidates have crafted, let alone presenting
them cogently enough to get the attention of said low information/interest
voters. But Democrats are facing a bigger problem: Trump and Republicans
haven't created a big enough, immediate enough crisis to jar those voters
out of their complacent everyday lives. On the other hand, it's not as if
he's actually convinced anyone who didn't vote for him in 2016 to support
him now.
Donald Trump will run to the left. Well, depends on what you mean by
"left." Robinson's example: "Do not be surprised when Trump runs as the
candidate of criminal justice reform." That's still a far cry from real
left issues, like promoting unions, or soaking the rich. Moreover, much
will depend on who he winds up running against: it'll be much easier to
outflank Buttigieg on the left than Sanders. Indeed, with Sanders it's
clear that Trump will run so hard against Sanders' "socialism" he won't
have any credibility to move to the left on anything.
Aaron Rupar:
Bhaskar Sunkara:
The DNC can't steal the election from Bernie Sanders despite the Iowa
chaos.
Theodore Schleifer:
A new social network makes an old bet: That we want to hear from rich
people. The startup is called Column, and it's basically an effort
to monetize free speech by dividing the world between those who can
afford to be speakers, and the rest, who can only follow. Still, I
expect they'll be tracking the latter's data, and selling what they
learn off to whoever is willing to pay for it (just like all the
other "social networks").
Dylan Scott:
Nate Silver:
Emily Stewart:
Matt Stieb:
Matt Taibbi:
Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor:
Democrats gave Obama a free pass. That could hurt us on election
day. "We refuse to talk about how his failure to deliver major
changes may have fed voter disaffection in 2016." For what it's worth,
I've been pretty critical of Obama, both before and after he was
elected, even though I voted for him in the 2008 caucus, and twice
in November. He promised change and, after blowing the Congressional
majority he was initially elected with, delivered nothing more than
a slow recovery from the deep recession he inherited, with all the
profits going to the top 1% -- a legacy so underwhelming Hillary
Clinton blew her pitch for a "third Obama term" who promised little
more than to vent the voters' frustration. Clearly, he wasn't nearly
as bad as his predecessor or his successor, but his legacy is very
thin compared to his promise, and twelve (or should I say twenty?)
years of lost opportunity calls for much bolder leadership -- not
candidates who would like to be his clones, but aren't even that.
Don't think Sanders can win? You don't understand his campaign.
Anya van Wagtendonk:
What is up with that tan line photo of Trump?
Alex Ward:
Trump just fired Gordon Sondland as EU ambassador: The post-acquittal
purge continues.
6 top 2020 Democrats vow to reverse Trump's new landmine policy.
Trump's Israel-Palestine peace plan: Read the full text of his so-called
"deal of the century." Some key elements of the plan, as noted here:
- The Vision provides for a demilitarized Palestinian state living
peacefully alongside Israel, with Israel retaining security
responsibility west of the Jordan River.
- Over time, the Palestinians will work with United States and
Israel to assume more security responsibility as Israel reduces its
security footprint.
- Neither Palestinians nor Israelis will be uprooted from their
homes.
- Israel has agreed to a four-year land freeze to secure the
possibility of a two-state solution.
- Jerusalem will stay united and remain the capital of Israel, while
the capital of the State of Palestine will be Al-Quds and include
areas of East Jerusalem.
- Palestinian refugees will be given a choice to live within the
future State of Palestine, integrate into the countries where they
currently live, or resettle in a third country.
I've spent a lot of time thinking about viable peace plans, so
I've considered many of these ideas, but I haven't read this thing
closely. For now, I'll just collect various links here:
As'ad AbuKhalil:
Trump 'solves' the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Hanna Alshaikh:
Palestinians don't need Jared Kushner to civilize them. They need
rights.
Ramzy Baroud:
Kushner as a colonial administrator: Let's talk about the 'Israeli
Model'.
Jonathan Cook:
Belen Fernandez:
On Jared Kushner's 25 books of undiluted Zionist propaganda.
Kushner explained his expertise by having read "25 books on it,"
so when I saw this article, I was hoping for a list. (I've read,
well, at least that many, so I can appreciate how one might
consider oneself an expert after that.) Still, not finding one
here, but Middle East Eye has offered its own list:
Jared Kushner, here are 25 more books you should read about
Palestine, Israel relations. Turns out I haven't read any of
these 25 either, although I have read other books by Ilan Pappé
and Raja Shehadeh. I'm afraid my own reading has been strongly
oriented to the Israeli side. A comment added another book I
wasn't aware of: Nur Masalha: Expulsion of the Palestinians:
The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Political Thought 1882-1948
(1992). Transfer was supposedly a British idea, introduced in the
1937 Peel Report, but was readily embraced by Ben-Gurion at that
time, as the concept was not foreign to Zionist thinking. Mary
Dockser Marcus discusses and dates it in her Jerusalem 1913:
The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict.
Robert Fisk:
Kushner's "ultimate deal" would strip Palestinians of their human
dignity.
Marc Owen Jones:
The colonial mindset behind his so-called 'peace plan'.
Rashid Khalidi:
The erasure of Palestinians from Trump's Mideast "peace plan" has a
hundred-year history.
Daniel Levy:
Don't call it a peace plan: "Ten ways Trump has launched a relentless
assault on the very idea of Israeli-Palestinian peace."
Saree Makdisi:
What's new about Trump's Mideast 'peace' plan? Only the blunt crudity of
its racism.
Nizar Mohamad:
The 'Deal of the Century,' an architecture of exclusion.
Jo-Ann Mort:
The Trump-Netanyahu plan to force Arab population transfer.
Emile Nakhleh:
Trump's 'peace plan' is the death knell of the two-state paradigm.
James North:
Yunna Patel:
Understanding the Trump 'Deal of the Century': what it does, and doesn't
say.
Stephen Robinson:
Kushner warns Palestinian leaders not to make him read a 26th book
about this crap.
Richard Silverstein:
James Zogby:
Trump and Balfour compared.
Netanyahu: 'Israeli right turns against Deal of the Century'.
I haven't really tried to digest this yet, but do want to emphasize
several points that are essential for any such deal:
- Israel must effectively be barred from any administrative or
direct security role in any territories given to the Palestinians.
Independent has to mean independent.
- Any Palestinians still resident in Israel after withdrawal
from Palestinian territories must have full citizenship and equal
rights in Israel.
- There needs to be an internationally administered tribunal to
assess claims of violence between the two states, with the power of
exacting monetary damages for acts committed by either government,
or by citizens of either state.
- There needs to be an international bank to fund reconstruction
and development projects, with the power to audit projects in case
of corruption. US aid to Israel should be routed through this bank
(but can be earmarked for Israel). Damage claims can be assessed
against bank funds.
I don't much care what borders are decided. The division could
be as small as Gaza only, or could include parts of the West Bank
(provided connectivity without checkpoints) as Kushner's plan proposes
(although I don't see any reason why a Palestinian enclave in the West
Bank should not extend to the Jordan River). A number of ancillary
issues need to be decided on a fair and generous basis: water, air
space, sanitation, prisoners, etc. I would advise Palestine to have
a bare minimum of armed forces, which may require guarantees against
Israeli attack or invasion beyond 3 above. I would also advise Israel
to reduce its armed forces, but don't see either limit as required.
One might require international supervision of free elections in the
Palestinian state, at least for the reconstruction period. Such
supervision would not be able to limit or exclude candidates or
parties. Given these basic guidelines, Kushner's plan appears to
be unviable. Even given the unreasonable biases of the plan, it's
likely that many Israelis will reject it, as they prefer no limits
on their power to seize land and repress the Palestinian people.
Philip Weiss:
Lis Harris wanted to understand how Israel had gone this way:
Interview, the author of In Jerusalem: Three Generations of an
Israeli Family and a Palestinian Family.
Edward Wong:
Americans demand a rethinking of the 'Forever War'.
Matthew Yglesias:
Li Zhou:
A brief guide to the State of the Union guests. They're all there
to make one point or another.
"He is not who you are": Adam Schiff makes last-ditch plea to Senate
Republicans. I'm not sure whether this pitch is more stupid or
pathetic. Even if some Republicans think of themselves as possessing
noble moral standards, they're not likely to feel any need to impress
Schiff with them. But most, like Trump, see impeachment as a cynical
political ploy. (Indeed, many were around when they did the same
thing to Bill Clinton.) But deep down, Congressional Republicans
aren't that different from Trump. They get their news from the same
partisan wells, they share most of the same prejudices, and their
loathing for Democrats knows few if any bounds.
PS: I've never been much impressed by Amanda Marcotte, but her visceral
rejection of Trump seems to be leading her to deeper truths. She has a
recent book, Troll Nation: How the Right Became Trump-Worshipping
Monsters Set on Ratf*cking Liberals, America, and Truth Itself, which
is about as pointed a title as the subject deserves. From the blurb:
Trump was the inevitable result of American conservatism's degradation
into an ideology of blind resentment. For years now, the purpose of
right wing media, particularly Fox News, has not been to argue for
traditional conservative ideals, such as small government or even
family values, so much as to stoke bitterness and paranoia in its
audience. . . . Conservative pundits, politicians, and activists have
abandoned any hope of winning the argument through reasoned discourse,
and instead have adopted a series of bad faith claims, conspiracy
theories, and culture war hysterics. Decades of these antics created
a conservative voting base that was ready to elect a mindless bully
like Donald Trump.
I also want to quote an
Amazon comment on the book by a Joseph Caferro, which gives us a
peek into the Trump troll mindset:
Why [really] do Trump and his followers troll? And the answer is
not hatred.
It's a tactic to destabilize the tenuous parasitic leftist
coalitions that are built on a dizzying array of incompatible
grievances against imagined enemy institutions. These enemies of
leftists include most of the most stable, successful institutions that
make civilization possible: religion, capitalism, meritocratic
education and commerce, strong national defense, controlled borders,
and solvent government spending. The incessant attacks on these
institutions by the left are largely encouraged by the DC
establishment and most state and local governments, and the result has
been failure of safety, solvency, competence, and sanity. Leftism
causes parasitic failure across the board. To defend leftist policies
on merit is impossible, so the left decided the primary tactic for
persuasion should be defamation, intimidation, and even criminal
extortion, persecution, and assault. So the right has had enough, and
has decided, symbolized by and led by Trump, to assail the leftist
establishment with criticism, skepticism, insults, and challenges to
their authority and power at all levels. Like in any street fight, you
can't win if you aren't willing to use the tactics your enemy is
willing to use. So the right trolls, because the left smears. As long
as the left smears and commits crimes to further their agenda, the
right will troll and be willing to stop those crimes with equal or
greater force. That is why the right trolls. Not because of your
imagined telepathic detection of deep seated Nazi hatred, but because
your leadership are a bunch of parasitic communist thugs who aspire to
totalitarian tyrannical rule, and deserve trolling.
I quote this because it's a lot more coherent than what you usually
get from this quarter, but still, there's a lot wrong here, starting
with a gross misapprehension of what the left is concerned with, and
more fundamentally with failure to understand that the bedrock of
"stable, successful institutions" is a widely shared sense of justice.
It's true that our notions of justice used to be rooted in religion,
but that splintered long ago. Some of us gave up the religion we were
born into precisely because it no longer seemed to satisfy our sense
of justice, and because we found it manipulated by charlatans for
special interests. Caferro's list of "successful institutions" turns
out to be less coherent than he imagines. Meritocracy sounds good,
but more often than not is just a ruse for rationalizing inequality.
The last three are arbitrarily grafted into the others: the rationale
behind a strong police state is to protect its rulers from the effects
of its misrule. "Leftism causes parasitic failure across the board"
is a crude way of restating Hayek's Road to Serfdom thesis,
which could be used to explain the economic failures of the Soviet
Union, but Hayek and his followers have always expected the same
doom to befall western social democracy, which has never happened.
Where Caferro's argument goes off the rails is his bit about how
"the left are largely encouraged by the DC establishment and most
state and local governments" and his later reference to "the leftist
establishment" -- there is no such thing, as should be clear from
the shit fit old guard Democrats are having over the prospect of
Sanders winning the Democratic Party nomination.
Then there's the question of tactics. Caferro argues that Trump
supporters have to troll because that's the way leftists fight them,
but that's neither supported by fact nor by logic. The left offers
much more substantial arguments than the name-calling Caferro hates,
but it's worth noting that the name-calling would hurt less if it
didn't smack of truth. Trump is a racist, a sexist, a liar, a crook,
and an all-around asshole. One can document those assertions with
hundreds or possibly thousands of pages of examples, but sometimes
the shorthand is all you need. Whether he's also a fascist depends
on some extra historical knowledge that may not be widely agreed on,
but most leftists define fascists as people who want to kill them,
so that's a relevant (if not universal) framework.
But just because your opponent fights one way doesn't mean you
have to fight the same. Strong occupying armies are most often
countered not by equivalent armies but by guerrilla warfare. One
might argue that they are morally equivalent, in that both seek to
kill the other, and that is often the downfall of the guerrillas.
So the other major example is non-violent resistance, such as the
movements led by Gandhi in India and Martin Luther King in the US.
I'd submit that Trump trolls have chosen their tactics not because
the left has but because they're more suited to taste, needs, and
morals (which approve of lies and distortions to sway people, and
violence to suppress them, all in support of an authoritarian
social and economic order which benefits people they identify
with).
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Friday, January 31, 2020
Music Week
January archive
(done).
Music: Current count 32712 [32640] rated (+72), 230 [228] unrated (+2).
Whereas last week I closed my count on Sunday as usual but didn't
post Music Week until Thursday, this week I'm even later, and this
time I used to the extra days to squeeze more
records in. For the record, the count was +34 Sunday evening, when I
would normally cut over. The reason for the extra days this week is
that I usually save away a
frozen copy of my yearly list
on or near the end of January, and I thought it would make more sense
to align that date with the end of
January Streamnotes.
Last year I decided to publish my reviews in my Music Week posts, out
each Monday, and align the
monthly Streamnotes
archives with Music Week posts, cutting off each month on its final
Monday. However, this year the final Monday left five days in the
month, which is normally 20-25 records -- enough of a discrepancy
to make me want to include them before freeze date.
On the other hand, I didn't get as much done in my extra days
[of January] as I hoped. In fact, the only way I'll get anything
up dated Jan. 31 is through the miracle of backdating. (I'm writing
this on Feb. 1, and doubt I'll get done tonight, either. [I finally
did the freeze Feb. 5, posting well after midnight, so Feb. 6.]) One
thing that got in the way was my decision to rustle up a rather
ambitious Friday dinner.
I thought of this initially as my mother's birthday, but rather
than fixing any of her specialties, I decided to slightly rework
the last birthday dinner I fixed for her. Only later did I realize
this was the 20th anniversary of that dinner. After she died in
June, we drove to Dodge City, where I made the same dinner for my
father's cousin, Zula Mae Reed. She was one of the first people
to introduce me to Chinese food. Ever since I figured out how to
make my own, I had wanted to cook Chinese or her.
After making the occasional stir-fry mess in New York, I moved
to New Jersey, threw my wok away, bought some good aluminum core,
stainless steel pans, and started studying Barbara Tropp's The
Modern Art of Chinese Cooking, and got pretty good at it. I
later branched out to practically everything else. But lately I've
steered away from Chinese for large dinners -- most dishes require
a final stir-fry, which is chaotic and leaves a huge mess (I call
this the "fire drill," a term which probably has racist origins
but seems perfectly descriptive in this case, even if everything
is perfectly executed). When I make Chinese these days, it's often
for just the two of us. I did just that a week ago, and felt that
I was losing my touch, so that made me all the more resolved to
prove I could still do it.
My menu last night:
- Fried chicken Szechuan style: cubed chicken breast, deep-fried,
stir-fried with spicy aromatics and a soy-based sauce.
- Stir-fried scallops with orange peel: velveted scallops, water
chesnuts, orange peel, in a soy-based sauce, garnished with deep-fried
spinach strands.
- Dry-fried beef: thin strips, marinated and deep-fried, then
stir-fried with carrots and green bell pepper strips and a dark soy
sauce.
- Dry-seared green beans: deep-fried, with stir-fried with pork,
dried shrimp, Szechuan and Tientsin vegetables, soy, and scallions.
- Dry-fried Chinese eggplant nuggets: stir-fried with aromatics,
and a chile-brown sugar-balsamic vinegar sauce.
- Shrimp, leek & pine nut fried rice: rice, with velveted shrimp,
sauteed leeks, fried egg, and pine nuts.
Huge amount of prep work here, including initial cooking in the deep
fryer (green beans, spinach, beef, chicken), in water (shrimp, scallops),
or in the sauté pan (leeks, eggs), soaking, cutting/chopping, arranging
aromatics on plates for each dish, mixing sauces for each dish (in two
cases with a separate cornstarch slurry to thicken), and garnishes. Once
everything was prepped, I did the final stir-fry two dishes at a time,
in rapid succession. Some minor problems along the way, and one or two
dishes didn't turn out quite perfect, but the dishes are so flavorful no
one else seemed disappointed.
For dessert, I thought I'd try the "fusion east-west" recipes in
Tropp's China Moon Cookbook: I did the chocolate-walnut tart
and ginger ice cream. The tart was overdone (could be that I used too
large a pan, making the crust and filling too thin), which made it
hard to get out of the nominally non-stick pan, and probably made it
a bit chewier than it was supposed to be. Neither turned out to be a
problem with the ice cream on top. Bumped the recipe by 50%, which
turned out to be the upper limit of the machine and a bit more than
I could put into my chosen container, but it was all gone before the
guests left.
Robert Christgau published his
Dean's List 2019 on January 26, with 76 records, 14 released
in 2018 or earlier (back to 2015, including my 2018 favorite, The
Ex: 27 Passports). A half-dozen titles hadn't been reviewed
yet in his Consumer Guide -- the biggest surprise Kalie Shorr's
Open Book. I gave it a low B+ in
December, resisting
the glitzy Nashville production, but gave it another shot, and
the songs started poking through. It's one of several re-grades
below -- mostly records I admired first time but liked a little
more on review. I replayed a few more I didn't budge, including
Purple Mountains, The Paranoid Style, Danny Brown, and Slowthai --
all solid B+(***), as I originally thought. I played everything
else I had missed (except couldn't find the Seeds soundtrack), but
haven't gone down the list to biggest disconnects (like 100 Gecs).
I don't mean to nitpick, but thought it might be helpful to
list my
non-jazz A-list picks
that Christgau hasn't yet reviewed or listed (skipping records,
like Hayes Carll: What It Is and Lana Del Rey: Norman
Fucking Rockwell, that Christgau gave B+ or stars to):
- Yugen Blakrok: Anima Mysterioum (IOT)
- Mdou Moctar: Blue Stage Session (Third Man)
- Control Top: Covert Contracts (Get Better)
- MexStep: Resistir (Third Root -18
- Mavis Staples: We Get By (Anti-)
- Dave: Psychodrama (Neighbourhood
- Weldon Henson: Texas Made Honky Tonk (Hillbilly Renegade)
- People Under the Stars: Sincerely, the P (Piecelock 70)
- Chris Knight: Almost Daylight (Drifters Church)
- Kelsey Waldon: White Noise/White Lines (Oh Boy)
- L'Orange & Jeremiah Jae: Complicate Your Life With Violence (Mello Music Group)
- Allison Moorer: Blood (Autotelic)
- Willie Nelson: Ride Me Back Home (Legacy)
- Nilüfer Yanya: Miss Universe (ATO)
- Freddie Gibbs & Madlib: Bandana (Keel Cool/RCA)
- Queen Key: Eat My Pussy (Again) (Machine Entertainment Group)
- The Chemical Brothers: No Geography (Virgin EMI)
- Caterina Barbieri: Ecstatic Computation (Editions Mego)
- Czarface: The Odd Czar Against Us (Silver Age)
- Murs: The Iliad is Dead and the Odyssey Is Over (Jamla/Empire)
- Hieroglyphic Being: Synth Expressionism/Rhythmic Cubism (On the Corner)
- YBN Cordae: The Lost Boy (Atlantic)
- Sault: 5 (Forever Living Originals)
- Sault: 7 (Forever Living Originals)
- The Campfire Flies: Sparks Like Little Stars (OverPop Music)
- Boy Harsher: Careful (Nude Club)
- Apollo Brown: Sincerely, Detroit (Mello Music Group)
- Pet Shop Boys: Inner Sanctum (X2)
- Lee Scratch Perry: Heavy Rain (On-U Sound)
- Sarathy Korwar: More Arriving (The Leaf Label)
- Snotty Nose Rez Kids: Trapline (Fontana North)
- Caroline Spence: Mint Condition (Rounder)
- Ani DiFranco: No Walls: Mixtape (Righteous Babe)
- Peter Perrett: Humanworld (Domino)
- Oompa: Cleo (OompOutLoud)
- Add-2: Jim Crow: The Musical (Add-2 Productions)
- Omar Souleyman: Shlon (Mad Decent/Because)
- Special Request: Offworld (Houndstooth)
- Leonard Cohen: Thanks for the Dance (Columbia/Legacy)
- Beans on Toast: The Inevitable Train Wreck (Beans on Toast Music)
I'm surprised this list ran so long (40 of 77 records, so 52%).
One thing Christgau laments on his list is a hip-hop shortfall,
but I count 13 here (including Blakrok, MexStep and Dave, but not
Yanya, Korwar or Sault). Also 6 country, some political folkies,
some electronica, and various world outposts. By the way, recent
adds and promotions made the non-jazz A-list longer than the
jazz one (77-to-75).
The extra listening time brought my number of reviewed 2019 releases
to 1224. This compares to 1075 at freeze time last year, 1145 in 2017,
1075 in 2016, 1110 in 2015, 1173 in 2014, 1149 in 2013, 1068 in 2012,
1334 in 2011, and 1236 in 2010. (Going further back: 2009: 1050, 2008:
907, 2007: 1135, 2006: 1089, 2005: 871, 2004: 941, 2003: 525. No data
for earlier years, as 2003 was when I started writing -- and getting
promos -- again.) About 75% of this year's records were streamed or
downloaded, which is probably a record high, but likely to be topped
each coming year. I've been expecting the review total to decline each
year since my 2011 peak. The only significance I attribute to the bump
this year is that I haven't felt up to doing much else. I expect it to
drop next year, perhaps significantly -- either if I get into writing
long-contemplated but slow-starting non-music projects, or if my health
declines.
Meanwhile, the main thing that slowed this post down wasn't a desire
to cram in more records. It was the time it took to reach a break point
in my
EOY Aggregate. I wound up
counting
689 lists, of which 174 were
considered major (generally, 20+ ranked records, scored 1-5 points),
vs. minor lists (top-tens, scored 1-3 points, or unranked lists), with
some discretion exercised. Aside from the lists, this includes grade
points from Robert Christgau, Michael Tatum, and myself (1-5 points),
which admittedly gives the totals a slight bias. I also included a
lot of
Jazz Critics Poll
individual ballots, which contributed significantly to the two jazz
albums that cracked the top 40 (plus ten more in the top 100). On
the other hand, with no Pazz & Jop poll this year, I wasn't able
to cherry-pick individual ballots there. Two more systematic biases
should be noted: I skipped nearly all metal lists this year, and I
skipped most of the international press lists that
Acclaimed Music Forums does such a good job of compiling. Both
omissions were mostly the result of priorities as I was trying to
catch up while recuperating from surgery, and I never got back to
them. I may find some reason to fiddle further, but at this point
the smart thing would be to leave well enough alone.
Here's the top 40, with points up front and my grades in brackets.
- [447] Lana Del Rey: Norman Fucking Rockwell (Polydor/Interscope) [A-]
- [380] Billy Eilish: When We All Fall Asleep Where Do We Go? (Darkroom/Interscope) [A-]
- [334] Tyler, the Creator: Igor (Columbia) [**]
- [319] FKA Twigs: Magdalene (Young Turks) [B]
- [278] Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds: Ghosteen (Ghosteen/Bad Seeds) [B]
- [275] Weyes Blood: Titanic Rising (Sub Pop) [B-]
- [274] Purple Mountains: Purple Mountains (Drag City) [***]
- [269] Lizzo: Cuz I Love You (Nice Life/Atlantic) [A-]
- [265] Sharon Van Etten: Remind Me Tomorrow (Jagjaguwar) [*]
- [259] Angel Olsen: All Mirrors (Jagjaguwar) [*]
- [235] Vampire Weekend: Father of the Bride (Columbia) [**]
- [226] Big Thief: U.F.O.F. (4AD) [A-]
- [224] Little Simz: Grey Area (Age 101) [A-]
- [206] Solange: When I Get Home (Saint/Columbia) [*]
- [181] Fontaines D.C.: Dogrel (Partisan) [***]
- [178] Brittany Howard: Jaime (ATO) [B]
- [173] Freddie Gibbs & Madlib: Bandana (Keep Cool/RCA) [A-]
- [166] Big Thief: Two Hands (4AD) [**]
- [166] Ariana Grande: Thank U Next (Republic) [**]
- [160] Jamila Woods: Legacy! Legacy! (Jagjaguwar) [A-]
- [148] Black Midi: Schlagenheim (Rough Trade) [**]
- [141] Dave: Psychodrama (Neighbourhood) [A-]
- [141] Michael Kiwanuka: Kiwanuka (Polydor) [*]
- [130] Jenny Lewis: On the Line (Warner Bros.) [*]
- [130] Slowthai: Nothing Great About Britain (Method) [***]
- [129] Danny Brown: Uknowhatimsayin¿ (Warp) [***]
- [125] Bon Iver: i,i (Jagjaguwar) [B]
- [117] Aldous Harding: Designer (4AD) [B]
- [116] Taylor Swift: Lover (Republic) [A-]
- [112] Julia Jacklin: Crushing (Polyvinyl) [B]
- [111] The Highwomen: The Highwomen (Elektra) [B]
- [111] The National: I Am Easy to Find (4AD) [**]
- [110] Bruce Springsteen: Western Stars (Columbia) [B-]
- [109] Kris Davis: Diatom Ribbons (Pyroclastic) [***]
- [107] Denzel Curry: Zuu (Loma Vista) [**]
- [105] Thom Yorke: Anima (XL) [B-]
- [103] Better Oblivion Community Center: Better Oblivion Community Center (Dead Oceans) [*]
- [103] Matana Roberts: Coin Coin Chapter Four: Memphis (Constellation) [***]
- [101] Carly Rae Jepsen: Dedicated (604/School Boy/Interscope) [***]
- [100] Rapsody: Eve (Roc Nation) [***]
Every aggregate list (either of lists or of individuals) has its
peculiar selection and weighting biases. I'm having trouble finding
more, but the big ones are
Album of
the Year and
Metacritic. I can't do any analysis at this time, but my impression
is that for a long time, the lists were dominated by alt/indie rock
with occasional celebrity-crossover hip-hop breakthroughs (e.g., Kanye
West and Kendrick Lamar). Last few years alt/indie has waned, and pure
pop albums have done better, as well as some artier things I often have
trouble fathoming (Nick Cave and Weyes Blood are prime examples this
year). One result is that there are more albums on the list I like these
days, certainly compared to 6-10 years ago (when I started compiling
these
EOY lists). Still, not a lot of critically
popular hip-hop this year (only Tyler, the Creator in the top 10 this
year, although it was a huge year for British hip-hop, with Little
Simz, Dave, Slowthai, and others just down the list).
New records reviewed this week:
Snoh Aalegra: Ugh, Those Feels Again (2019, Artrium):
Soul singer, born in Sweden, parents Iranian, original name Shahrzad
Fooladi, based in Los Angeles, first album Feels, so title is
a play on that.
B+(**)
Add-2: Jim Crow: The Musical (2019, Add-2 Productions):
Chicago rapper Andre DiJuan Daniels, mixtapes since 2005 including four
volumes of Tale of Two's City, and the album Prey for the
Poor. Title suggests two dimensions of distance -- history viewed
on stage, past from present, others from self -- but Jim Crow persists
as a mental trap, not least because it's periodically reinforced by
events.
A-
Altin Gün: Gece (2019, ATO): "Anatolian rock" band,
founded in Amsterdam by bassist Jasper Verhulst, with Merve Dasdemir
(vocals) and Erdic Yildiz Ecevit (vocals, saz, keys) for Turkish roots.
Ranges between groove and spots for "a very soulful language." As
usual, any psychedelia is in the mind of the beholder.
B+(**)
Daymé Arocena: Sonocardiogram (2019, Brownswood):
Cuban singer, based in London, fourth album, has a bit of a diva
complex, though I could see getting into that.
B
BaianaSystem: O Futuro Não Demora (2019, Máquina De
Louco): Brazilian group, from Salvador in Bahia. Forró roots with
electronic beats, postmodern imports, even a bit of Manu Chao.
B+(***)
BCUC: The Healing (2019, Buda Musique): South
African group, from Soweto, acronym stands for Bantu Continua
Ubuntu Consciousness, the polyglot name a hint of international
eclecticism. But still sounds more like Afrobeat, with two of
three pieces running long (19:18, 16:23), and not just the one
Femi Kuti guests on. Saul Williams appears on the 3:54 closer.
B+(**)
BCUC: Emakhosini (2018, Buda Musique): Earlier
record, same basic idea, no guests.
B+(*)
Benny Benack III: A Lot of Livin' to Do (2019 [2020],
LA Reserve): Trumpet player, sings, second album, wrote four songs but
mostly depends on standards, big name in the band is bassist Christian
McBride, has two guest spots for female singers.
B+(**) [01-24]
Daniel Bernardes & Drumming GP: Liturgy of the Birds: In
Memoriam Olivier Messiaen (2018 [2019], Clean Feed): Pianist,
from Portugal, leads a trio augmented by a percussion quartet. All
original compositions, their pedigree as "explorations of Olivier
Messiaen's compositional techniques" something I'll have to take at
face value.
B+(**)
Big K.R.I.T.: K.R.I.T. Iz Here (2019, Multi Alumni):
Mississippi rapper Justin Lewis Scott, fourth album, long list of
mixtapes. Came out late and hardly anyone noticed.
B+(**)
Jim Black Trio: Reckon (2019 [2020], Intakt): Drummer,
fourth album since 2011 with this particular trio: Elias Stemseder
(piano) and Thomas Morgan (bass). Helps to focus on the drummer here,
frantically tying together the many remarkable tangents.
A-
Black Alien: Abaixo De Zero: Hello Hell (2019, Extrapunk
Extrafunk): Brazilian singer/rapper, Gustavo de Almeida Ribeiro, started
in a duo with Speed 1993-2001. Nine cuts, 26:49.
B+(*)
Zach Brock/Matt Ulery/Jon Deitemyer: Wonderment (2018
[2019], Woolgathering): Violin-bass-drums trio.
B+(**)
Brockhampton: Ginger (2019, Question Everything/RCA):
Hip-hop "boy band" collective, formed in Texas but moved to California,
best-known member releases solo albums as Kevin Abstract.
B+(**)
Apollo Brown: Sincerely, Detroit (2019, Mello Music
Group): Erik Vincent Stephens, grew up in Grand Rapids, moved to
Detroit in 2003, hip-hop producer, a dozen albums sharing credit
with various rappers, six more under his own name. Here it feels
like he's working with the whole city, at least what's left of it.
Not optimism -- "we knew from the start that things fall apart" --
but hard-earned survival.
A-
Charly Bliss: Supermoon (2019, Barsuk, EP): Listed
by Napster as Charly Bliss 2019 EP, but this title appears
on Bandcamp and elsewhere. Five songs, 15:52, smart pop.
B+(**)
Gary Clark Jr.: This Land (2019, Warner Brothers):
The most hyped bluesman of his generation, certainly at the moment
he first arrived. Never impressed me, but maybe I was wrong to slot
him in blues -- a music he can play credibly (cf. "Dirty Dish Blues"
here) but is just one facet of his fairly eclectic rock repertoire.
He's just as likely to signal Funkadelic or the Miracles, but never
what you'd call inspired, even when he pumps up the volume.
B
Luke Combs: What You See Is What You Get (2019,
River House/Columbia Nashville): Country singer from North Carolina,
second album, big voice, heavy guitar, likes beer and dogs, less
sure about love, considers himself one of the "Blue Collar Boys."
B+(**)
Jamael Dean: Black Space Tapes (2019, Stones Throw):
Young pianist (20), born in Bakersfield, father a "soul jazz" drummer,
grew up in Los Angeles, currently enrolled at New School in New York,
first album. Six cuts, revolving cast, seems rather scattered, with
bits of hip-hop fusion and acid jazz, but none quite predictable.
B+(*)
Dreamville: Revenge of the Dreamers III (2019,
Dreamville): Various artists, but sources credit this to the label,
and I've seen it filed under star J. Cole. I initially guessed this
had something to do with the so-called Dreamers, but I can't find
any evidence of a political theme. Rather, this celebrates a found
community, brought together by creativity and commerce.
B+(*)
Daniel Erdmann's Velvet Revolution: Won't Put No Flag Out
(2019, Budapest Music Center): German tenor saxophonist, first album
as leader 2007, second album with this trio -- Théo Ceccaldi (viola,
violin) and Jim Hart (vibes, percussion). "Over the Rainbow" is an odd
cover choice, marking a shift to chamber jazz.
B+(**)
Dori Freeman: Every Single Star (2019, Blue Hens Music):
Folksinger-songwriter from Virginia, fourth album, reminds me of Iris
DeMent -- sure, a kinder, gentler version.
B+(***)
Jan Garbarek/The Hilliard Ensemble: Remember Me, My Dear
(2014 [2019], ECM New Series): British male vocal quartet, named after
an Elizabethan miniaturist painter, focused on medievel and renaissance
music from 1980, later entering into several collaborations, notably
with Swedish saxophonist Garbarek on 1994's Officium. Evidently
disbanded in 2014 after this farewell concert in Bellinzona, Switzerland.
I loved the sax so much on the debut that I wound up liking the voices,
but the lower the ratio, the less patient I become.
B+(*)
Halsey: Manic (2020, Capitol): Pop singer-songwriter
Ashley Frangipane, third album. Two plays, has some edge, some hooks,
not sure whether she's interesting or mostly a flake.
B+(***)
Tim Heidecker: Another Year in Hell: Collected Songs From 2018
(2018 [2019], Jagjaguwar, EP): Comedian, writer, director, actor, musician --
I can't say as he was on my radar until he released a collection of songs
about Donald Trump in 2017 (Too Dumb for Suicide). Sample lyric:
"I'm down in the basement making signs out of love . . . and I hope I
find a like minded girl tonight at the trump rally." Six cuts, 18:38.
B
Hieroglyphic Being: Synth Expressionism/Rhythmic Cubism
(2019, On the Corner): Jamal Moss, from Chicago but associated more
with Detroit techno, has close to fifty albums since 2008, most on
his own Mathematics label, but I only seem to notice him when some
other label picks him up (e.g., Soul Jazz). Vinyl-sized at 5 songs,
34:25, opens with old-fashioned synths, adds a couple of saxophones
to the 12:12 closer ("Timbuktu 2"), a very choice cut.
A-
Jenny Hval: The Practice of God (2019, Sacred Bones):
Norwegian singer-songwriter, studied in Australia before returning to
Norway. Went all goth on her last album (Blood Bitch), but turns
here to avant-electronics producer Lasse Marhaug, and the beats help a
lot.
B+(***)
Bobby J From Rockaway: Summer Classics (2019, Make
Noise): White rapper from Queens, first record, old-style beats and
boasts, even has a song called "Blue Eyed Soul," but gets production
help from Kwamé, Statik Selektah, and others, and a guest shot from
Kilah Priest, and has some fun.
B+(**)
JackBoys and Travis Scott: JackBoys (2019, Cactus
Jack/Epic, EP): Houston collective centered on Scott's Cactus Jack
label, seven-cut "compilation" (21:23), with Scott featured on 3-4
tracks, Don Tolliver taking lead on one, Sheck Wes and Young Thug
also appearing. Trap rap minus hard edges, as far as I can figure.
B+(*)
Jealous of the Birds: Wisdom Teeth (2019, Atlantic,
EP): Naomi Hamilton, Irish singer-songwriter, released an album in
2015, two EPs since, this the second, 5 substantial songs, 18:40.
B+(**)
Cody Jinks: After the Fire (2019, Late August):
Country singer-songwriter from Texas, self-released six albums
before signing to Rounder for two that finally cracked the country
charts. Classic sound, old-time virtues, an eye for detail, a bit
of jazz at the end.
B+(***)
Cody Jinks: The Wanting (2019, Late August):
Released just a week after After the Fire, a gimmick
that promised two consecutive number ones, but Wikipedia shows
both albums topped at 2, as did his previous best, Lifers.
Pretty much the same album, but a couple of songs strike me as
a tad overweight -- maybe he's just leaning in too hard.
B+(**)
Oumar Konaté: I Love You Inna (2018 [2019], Clermont
Music): From Mali, fifth album, good-enough singer but really impressive
on electric guitar, backed by electric bass and drums in a configuration
that would have turned Jimi Hendrix's head.
A-
Arto Lindsay/Joe McPhee/Ken Vandermark/Phil Sudderberg:
Largest Afternoon (2019 [2020], Corbett vs. Dempsey):
OK, some guys got together in Chicago, and rolled the tape. The
saxophonists do this sort of thing all the time, so this is fairly
typical for them. Lindsay sticks to guitar here, and everything
seems to be improv, so don't expect his usual crypto-Brazilian
no wave, but he turns in a respectable performance, cutting
against the grain.
B+(**) [bc]
Fred Lonberg-Holm/Joe McPhee: No Time Left for Sadness
(2019 [2020], Corbett vs. Dempsey): Cello and tenor sax duets, the
former also on electronics. Three pieces, increasing length, driven
mostly by the cello although this winds up being a strong performance
for McPhee.
B+(**) [bc]
John McLaughlin/Shankar Mahadevan/Zakir Hussain: Is That
So? (2020, Abstract Logix): The guitarist's love affair
with Indian music dates back at least to his 1976 Shakti,
which percussionist Hussain played on. Not sure when vocalist
Mahadevan entered the picture, but he was touring with McLaughlin
in 2013 when "the idea for this album appeared in my mind." He
dominates this album: I'm duly impressed by his remarkable voice,
but have limited use for his style of opera.
B+(**)/p>
Microwave: Death Is a Warm Blanket (2019, Pure Noise):
Post-hardcore band from Atlanta, third album. Reminds me a bit of Husker
Du, not a band I've bothered playing in decades. Also liked them a bit
more when they opened up, a reaction Husker Du fans may not share.
B+(*)
Hedvig Mollestad Trio: Smells Funny (2019, Rune
Grammofon): Norwegian jazz-rock trio, leader's full name Hedvig
Mollestad Thomassen (guitar), with Ellen Brekken (bass) and Ivar
Loe Bjørnstad (drums). Raw power, impressive guitar chops.
B+(**)
Allison Moorer: Blood (2019, Autotelic): Country
singer-songwriter from Alabama, sister of Shelby Lynne, has had two
famous songwriter-husbands. Tenth album, title tied to a memoir:
the headline event in her life was in 1986 when her father shot
and killed her mother, then killed himself. Not sure any songs can
do full justice to the event, but these cut deep and move you.
A-
Bob Mould: Sunshine Rock (2019, Merge): Main guy
in Hüsker Dü, an important 1980s band I've lost my interest in,
went solo in 1989 and has cranked out a dozen albums since, to
no special distinction. Still, this attaches more hooks to his
signature din, and occasionally takes a break to find his voice,
maybe even a melody (e.g., title cut).
B+(**)
The Murder Capital: When I Have Fears (2019, Human
Season): Irish post-punk group, first album. Laura suggested "Pogues
meet New Order," but doesn't really deliver either distinction. The
double guitars sprawl where punk chops, and the vocals sound more
like Nick Cave.
B+(*)
Murs: The Iliad Is Dead and the Odyssey Is Over (2019,
Jamla/Empire): Rapper Nick Carter, albums since 2003 and still underground,
produced by 9th Wonder and the Soul Council. Barely noticed when it came
out, this is one of his best.
A-
Aaron Novik: The Fallow Curve of the Planospheres (2019,
Avant LaGuardia): Clarinet player, bills himself as coposer first, and
that's clearly the focus here. Album is conceived of as a compilation
of five "suites of music," each an EP (although I've found no evidence
of them having been previously released), each with a different band
and locale.
B+(*)
Otoboke Beaver: Itekoma Hits (2019, Damnably):
Japanese punk rock group, four women, singer-songwriter Accorinrin,
records since 2011, not sure how much of this 14-song, 26:26 LP is
new -- 5 songs from a 2016 EP, one new recording of an older song.
Ultimately too chaotic, harsh, noisy for my taste, but for a moment
I was pretty impressed.
B+(**)
Jeff Parker: Suite for Max Brown (2020, International
Anthem): Chicago guitarist, has appeared in avant-jazz groups (Chicago
Underground Trio), also in experimental post-rock outfits (Tortoise,
Isotope 217), his own work widely scattered, as is this. Title cut is
pretty seductive, with trumpet and alto sax over slinky rhythm.
B+(**) [bc]
The Pernice Brothers: Spread the Feeling (2019,
Ashmont): Alt/indie band, Joe Pernice is the singer-songwriter,
brother Bob also plays guitar, eighth album since 1998.
B+(*) [bc]
Post Malone: Hollywood's Bleeding (2019, Republic):
Rapper-singer Austin Richard Post, from Syracuse, third album, seems
to be quite popular. Aims for a big, arena sound. I find it a bit
claustrophobic, even though the pummeling offers occasional pleasures.
B
Emily Scott Robinson: Traveling Mercies (2019,
Tone Tree Music): Folksinger-songwriter from North Carolina, lives
in an RV she's put more than a quarter million miles on, took a
short break from her touring to record this debut album. Character
songs, probably fiction -- I doubt she's really a "white hot country
mess," but that's her best shot for a hit.
B+(***)
Kurt Rosenwinkel Bandit 65: Searching the Continuum
(2019, Heartcore): Guitarist, from Philadelphia, based in Switzerland,
debut 1996, bills his band -- a trio with Tim Motzer (guitar) and
Gintas Janusonis (drums), both also electronics -- as a "post-jazz
sonic trio." I omitted "mesmerizing," an intent they only occasionally
achieve.
B+(***)
Serengeti: Music From the Graphic Novel Kenny Vs the Dark Web
(2019, Burnco, EP): Chicago rapper David Cohn, has a lot of mixtapes,
many featuring a character named Kenny Dennis, who reappears here (more
or less -- this feels more like scattered outtakes than anything thematic,
even though the graphic novel supposedly is). 7 tracks, 18:17.
B+(**)
Shed: Oderbruch (2019, Ostgut Ton): German DJ/producer,
fifth album since 2008, really like his upbeat pieces, don't dislike the
more atmospheric ones.
B+(***)
Ed Sheeran: No. 6 Collaborations Project (2019, Atlantic):
English singer-songwriter, fourth album, pretty big star over there, one
I've generally found amiably listenable. Harder to judge this one given
that each cut has one or more guests, most rappers and/or r&b singers.
B+(**)
Skyzoo & Pete Rock: Retropolitan (2019, Mello
Music Group): Rapper Gregory Skyler Taylor (8 albums and 14 mixtapes
since 2004), first with producer Peter Phillips.
B+(**)
Sly Horizon: The Anatomy of Light (2018 [2019],
Iluso): Trio: Rick Parker (trombone), Alvaro Domene (guitar), and
Jeremy Carlstedt (drums), everyone also credited with electronics,
which generates most of the dark ambience.
B+(*) [bc]
Son Volt: Union (2019, Transmit Sound): Alt-country
band, Jay Farrar's second after Uncle Tupelo, ninth album since 1995.
Has picked up some politics, even setting a Joe Hill speech to music.
B+(*)
The Steel Woods: Old News (2019, Woods Music):
Southern rock traditionalists, based in Nashville, Wes Bayliss
and Jason "Rowdy" Cope the principals, second album, comes on
strong, leaves me cold. Docked a notch for making Merle Haggard
sound like a bitter old jerk.
B-
Harry Styles: Fine Line (2019, Columbia): English,
former boy group star from One Direction, second solo album. Seems
pointless even when he comes up with something catchy -- actually,
the catchier, the more annoying it gets.
C+
Sunn O))): Life Metal (2019, Southern Lord): Drone metal
band, eighth album since 2000. Emphasis on drone, with more fuzz than
metal. I don't seriously dislike it, but seems slight, and I don't get
the appeal.
B-
Leo Svirsky: River Without Banks (2019, Unseen Worlds):
American composer, based in the Netherlands, fifth album since 2011.
Mostly piano, rolls on and on.
B+(**)
Veronica Swift: Confessions (2019, Mack Avenue):
Jazz singer, started young with an album at age 9 (Veronica's
House of Jazz) with Richie Cole, Hod O'Brien (her father), and
Stephanie Nakasian (her mother) -- O'Brien, who died in 2016, played
piano an all-time favorite album, Roswell Rudd's Flexible Flyer
(with Sheila Jordan). Standards, backed by Benny Green Trio on three
cuts, Emmet Cohen's on the rest. Dazzling vocal chops.
B+(**)
Rebecca Trescher: Where We Go (2019, Enja/Yellowbird):
German clarinet player, third album, leads a tentet, replete with harp,
vibes, lots of flutes, and scat voice -- none of which manage to spoil
the impressive arranging.
B+(**)
Dwight Trible: Mothership (2019, Gearbox): Jazz singer,
based in Los Angeles, half-dozen albums since 2001, starts with a piece
by LA jazz legend Horace Tapscott, covers some more usual suspects,
wrote three.
B+(*)
Amber Weekes: Pure Imagination (2019 [2020], Amber
Inn Productions): Standards singer, second album, very fond of Oscar
Brown Jr., starts delightful (especially "It's All Right With Me"),
less so on the ballads, least of all a duet with Mon David.
B+(*) [cd]
Kanye West: Jesus Is King (2019, GOOD Music/Def Jam):
Could be he was punking Trump, who clearly got off on proximity to
such celebrity and feigned obeissance, but hard to see how he figured
to pull off the same trick with G-d, unless his anarchism harbors a
closeted atheist. Nothing here convinces me that he believes in G-d,
much less that I should. He takes the hollow trimmings of Christianity
and turns them into a chaotic mess, without even offering a wink that
he might be aiming for satire, which leaves us with some form of mental
illness. Still has production chops and can rap, and there's one bit of
good news: it's only 27:04 long.
B-
Wilco: Ode to Joy (2019, dBpm): Jeff Tweedy's band,
in a particularly middling mood, doesn't seem like much, but can't
complain about the comfort factor.
B+(*)
Will of the People [Haftor Medbøe]: Will of the People
(2019, Copperfly): Norwegian guitarist, based in Edinburgh, several
albums since 2005, first for this trio with Pete Furniss (bass clarinet
and electronics) and Tom Bancroft (drums).
B+(**)
Wire: Mind Hive (2020, Pink Flag): Forty years after
they raised the art-bar for punk, they've broadened their music without
fundamentally changing it. This one almost seems like a return to basics.
B+(***)
Brandee Younger: Soul Awakening (2019, self-released):
Harp player, from Long Island, pulled this early tape off the shelf:
producer Dezron Douglas (bass) and the drummer (usually EJ Strickland)
craft a matrix that envelops the harp while letting it sparkle. Plus
guests: Niia sings one track, the rest have horns, the standout among
many fine performances Ravi Coltrane.
B+(***)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Julie Coker: A Life in the Limelight: Lagos Disco & Itsekiri
Highlife 1976-1981 (1976-81 [2019], Kalita): Gained initial fame
as Miss Western Nigeria 1957, moved into TV and radio, produced two albums
fileted here (7 songs, 30:55). Nothing major here.
B+(*)
Professor Longhair: Live on the Queen Mary (1975 [2019],
Harvest): New Orleans piano legend Roy Byrd, started recording in 1949
but had few albums before his death in 1980, after which his reputation
was secured in numerous live tapes and a stellar 2-CD Rhino retrospective.
This one appeared early, in 1978, probably because it was "presented by
Paul and Linda McCartney." Seems a bit redundant at this stage, but if
I heard it first, I might well have been blown away.
B+(***)
Jim Sullivan: U.F.O. (1969 [2019], Light in the Attic):
Singer-songwriter, guitarist, recorded two albums before mysteriously
disappearing in 1975. Not easily classifiable, but not interesting or
weird enough to matter.
B
Jim Sullivan: Jim Sullivan (1972 [2019], Light in the
Attic): Second album, a second introduction, dropping the fake strings
and letting the music flow, with a country accent and a few horns.
B+(*)
This Is Toolroom 2019 (Edits) (2019, Toolroom): English
electronica label, founded by Mark Knight in 2004, purveyors of something
called tech house, which in my book could pass for techno or house. This
was number two on the Ye Wei Blog EOY list: presumably the full-length
(20 tracks, 129:10) version as opposed to the (Edits), which is
the only version I could find online (same 20 reduced by half to 69:36).
Various artists, Knight's the only name I recognize, with beats so similar
they could come from the same shop. Still, grows on you.
B+(***)
Grade (or other) changes:
75 Dollar Bill: I Was Real (2019, Thin Wrist):
Guitar-drums duo, Che Chen and Rick Brown, the former studied
Mauritanian music with Jheich Ould Chighaly, perhaps why their most
obvious connection seems to be with Saharan blues-rock, but they
work with all sorts of guitar patterns. No vocals, none needed.
[was B+(***)] A-
Stella Donnelly: Beware of the Dogs (2019, Secretly
Canadian): Singer-songwriter born in Wales, moved as a child to Perth,
Australia, offers what Christgau calls "a catalogue of assholes" --
males, "boys will be boys," etc. -- although I'm also struck by the
allergies and bearers of infectious diseases.
[was B+(***)] A-
Craig Finn: I Need a New War (2019, Partisan): Fourth
solo album, after fronting groups Lifter-Puller and the Hold Steady
(a continuing venture with its own album this year). Has a distinctive
voice, writes serious songs about interesting people. Initially taken
aback by the title here refers to U.S. Grant, who would think such a
thing, and still prefer the band effort, but this one is growing on me.
[was: B+(***)] A-
Kalie Shorr: Open Book (2019, self-released):
Singer-songwriter from Maine, based in Nashville. Songs have some
country in them and are often brash and pointed. Production bigger
than she needs, but she rocks harder than any Nashville ingenue
since Miranda Lambert.
[was: B+(*)] A-
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Mark Segger Sextet: Lift Off (18th Note) [02-07]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, January 26, 2020
Weekend Roundup
Not much on the impeachment trial below. I remember watching Senate
hearings on Watergate, but haven't followed anything in Congress that
closely since -- even the Iraq War votes (note plural), or a series of
Supreme Court votes (starting with Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas) even
though they were much more consequential. The Democrats would like to
see this impeachment as a grave, solemn affair, but it doesn't differ
from the Clinton impeachment enough to sway me. Of course, if given the
chance, I'd vote to convict -- fact of the matter is I would have voted
to convict Clinton as well -- but the 2020 election remains the prize,
and this is just a distraction. If Republicans decide to throw Trump
under the bus, they'd still have the colorless, soulless Mike Pence in
the White House, still have their Senate majority, and still have all
those judges they've confirmed during the last three years. On the
other hand, the 2020 elections offer the hope of starting to reverse
the tragic effects of electing those Republicans in recent years. I
know I've eschewed reporting on horserace political stories, but I'd
much rather be reading
Bernie Sanders surges into lead in new CNN poll and
Polls show Bernie Sanders surging at just the right time and
Getting Bernie over the top than anything on the impeachment
trial travesty or how sad our wretched democracy has become.
Some scattered links this week:
Tim Alberta:
How the gun show became the Trump show.
Kate Aronoff:
Why climate-conscious plutocrats still like Trump: "Attendees at the
World Economic Forum in Davos this week say they're worried about global
warming. But they're also looking out for their business models." By the
way, Trump was in Davos last week, trying to look busy during his trial,
sending soundbites back home while contributing nothing there (e.g., see
Trump roars, and Davos shrugs.)
Zach Beauchamp:
Bernie Sanders's Joe Rogan experience: "Joe Rogan's controversial
endorsement of Bernie Sanders, explained." I can't say as I knew the
first thing about Rogan before reading this. I add that nothing here
makes me want to listen to Rogan's podcasts. On the other hand, any
"leftists" who see this endorsement as rason to attack Bernie have
a death wish, such that you have to wonder whether left politics
has any practical meaning for them.
Julia Belluz:
A SARS-like virus is spreading quickly. Here's what you need to know.
Related links:
Ben Burgis:
The many bad arguments against Medicare for All.
Peter Cary:
How Republicans made millions on the tax cuts they pushed through
Congress: "The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a case study of how
lawmakers make themselves richer with the bills they pass."
Casey Cep:
The long war against slavery: A review of Vincent Brown's book,
Tacky's Revolt: The Story of an Atlantic Slave War, which
starts with a slave revolt in Jamaica and situates it in the context
of the broader debate over slavery.
Jonathan Chait:
Clio Chang:
The only thing stopping us from taxing the rich is political will:
Interview with Gabriel Zucman, "the rock star behind the wealth tax,"
co-author with Emmanuel Saez of The Triumph of Injustice: How the
Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay (a book I read and
recommend). Of course, one should add that political will in the US
is not equally (or even randomly) distributed, but is skewed heavily
toward the rich. It's also technically more difficult to assess a
wealth tax than a progressive income tax that would impact the rich
and raise comparable revenues. The estate tax is an exception here,
in that the government could simply confiscate whatever property is
covered, liquidate the assets, and pay off the untaxed share (if there
still is one) to the heirs in cash (possibly an annuity).
Jelani Cobb:
Trump, impeachment, and the short-term thinking of the GOP.
Coral Davenport:
Trump removes pollution controls on streams and wetlands.
Jackson Diehl:
Trump's hallmark foreign policy failure? 'Maximum pressure.'
Larry Elliott:
Soros gives $1bn to fund universities 'and stop the drift towards
authoritarianism': That's the thing about the left-right split
among billionaires. Not only are the right-wing types more numerous,
they put their money fairly narrowly into securing even more political
power. Soros does spend money on politicians, but he spends a lot more
on projects that are meant to do direct good, rather than trying to
redirect the corruption of the political class to more noble ends.
Lee Fang:
Interim Bolivian government taps the same lobby firm hired to sell the
coup in Honduras. Big surprise: the firm is based in Washington,
DC.
Liza Featherstone:
Adam Schiff is a dangerous warmonger: A track record which makes his
promotion of weapons for Ukraine all the more disturbing.
Thomas Geoghegan:
Educated fools: Why Democratic leaders still misunderstand the politics
of social class.
Kim Ghattas:
The Muslim world's question: 'What happened to us?' In an excerpt
from his book, Black Wave: Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Forty-Year
Rivalry That Unraveled Culture, Religion, and Collective Memory in the
Middle East, the author points to three pivotal events from 1979:
the Iranian Revolution, the siege of the Holy Mosque in Mecca by Saudi
zealots, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (which the US, allying
with Islamist-ruled Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, countered by bankrolling
jihad). I'd add the 1979 oil shock, which resulted in Carter declaring
the Persian Gulf a vital interest to the United States, the US-brokered
peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, which split Egypt away from its
previous interest in Arab unity, and Israel's initial invasion into
Lebanon's civil war (which Carter was able to cancel at the time, but
Israel repeated in 1982). Two points stand out here: from 1979 on the
US took a much more direct, much more aggressive role in the Middle
East; but in many ways the US let their "allies" direct operations at
a detailed level, especially those based on politicizing religion,
and that eventually resulted in those "allies" directing US policy
for their own regional purposes, with little or no regard for broader
American interests. So while it's true that much of the Muslim world
is saying "what happened to us?" many in America are left wondering
the very same thing.
Amy Goodman:
Law professor: Trump could also have been impeached for war crimes,
assassinations and corruption: Title reflects interview with
Marjorie Cohn. Such an indictment would be more interesting and
more damning than the one that Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler chose to
prosecute.
David A Graham:
Here's what Trump has been up to while Americans have been distracted
by impeachment. E.g.:
The administration has announced a series of major steps just in the
past few days, since senators were sworn in for the impeachment trial
on January 16.
On January 17, the Agriculture Department announced that it would
roll back nutritional standards for school lunches that were championed
by former first lady Michelle Obama. (In what the government insisted
was a coincidence, January 17 is her birthday.) . . .
Yesterday, while hobnobbing with the world's wealthiest elites at
the World Economic Forum, in Davos, Trump told CNBC that he would
consider cutting entitlements in a second term. . . .
He also said he'd expand his controversial travel ban to Belarus,
Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania, with
different restrictions on people from different countries. . . .
Meanwhile, the administration also disclosed plans to make it
harder for pregnant women to get visas to travel to the United States,
a move intended to prevent women from giving birth stateside and thus
earning American citizenship for their children. The phenomenon of
"anchor babies" or "birth tourism" has been, like Michelle Obama's
lunch rules, a conservative obsession for years, though it's unclear
how many people actually come to the U.S. to give birth. . . .
Today is still young, but already the administration is set to
announce a drastic reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act that will
exempt a large number of waterways from protection and allow more
pollution.
All of this is only a few days' worth of changes. Impeachment has
dominated political news for nearly four months now, and the
administration has made plenty of other under-the-radar moves -- cuts
to food stamps, rollbacks to LBGTQ protections, and diverting Pentagon
funds to pay for border-wall construction among them.
Greg Grandin:
Slavery, and American racism, were born in genocide. A little
history refresher, published for MLK Day.
Jacob Heilbrunn:
The Neocons strike back: "How a discredited foreign policy ideology
continues to wreak havoc in Washington and around the world."
Nathan Heller:
Is venture capital worth the risk? "The industry shaped the past
decade. It could destroy the next."
Sean Illing:
Is Trumpism a cult? Interview with Steven Hassan, author of a new
book, The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the
President Uses Mind Control. Hassan's gained his "expertise" on
cults by joining and eventually leaving the "Moonies." That doesn't
strike me as very relevant, nor do I find it easy to credit Trump
with the mental skills to be manipulative. On the other hand, there
clearly are lots of people who want to think of him as the voice of
God, and he's not one to dispel that sort of delusion. Maybe that
dynamic will harden into a cult eventually, and as it does some of
his followers will rebel, as Hassan eventually did. But I can't see
any reason for the rest of us to read their inevitable books.
Sarah Jones:
Steve King is building a dank fascist meme stash.
Joshua Keating:
Forever wars don't end. They just go corporate.
Ed Kilgore:
Maya King:
Bloomberg's massive ad campaign hikes TV prices for other candidates.
Ezra Klein:
Why Democrats still have to appeal to the center, but Republicans don't:
The most convincing reason I see here is that most Democrats still depend
on centrist corporate media giants to stay "reality-based," where the
right has Fox, convincing the Republican base that there is no reality,
just their political fears and biases.
Steve Krakauer:
Trump's wedding to Melania was 15 years ago. It explains so much about
our cultural moment.
Anita Kumar:
How Trump fused his business empire to the presidency: "critics say
the president has yet to face accountability for blatant conflicts of
interest tied to his private businesses."
Eric Levitz:
German Lopez:
Marijuana legalization is about to have a huge year.
Ian Millhiser:
Ella Nilsen:
Bernie Sanders's path to the 2020 Democratic nomination,
explained.
Anna North:
Andre Pagliarini:
Brazilian conservatives really hate Glenn Greenwald. Other links on
Brazil and/or Greenwald:
Cameron Peters:
Why a question about Ukraine sent Mike Pompeo into a rage. Well, he
does come off as a guy with a lot of pent-up rage. Related:
Kelsey Piper:
Kansas's ag-gag law has been ruled unconstitutional: "The 1990 law
banned documenting animal abuse on factory farms."
Andrew Prokop:
John Quiggin:
Libertarians can't save the planet.
Adam K Raymond:
All the problems with the New York Times's televised endorsement
special. Not all of them, of course. But it starts with the softball
candidate interviews, continues with the ignorance and carelessness of
the "judges," and continues through the decision to present the sausage
making as reality TV faux drama, to the surprisingly indecisive finale.
By the way, the actual written endorsement, which at least doesn't bury
the lede, is here:
The Democrats' best choices for president: Elizabeth Warren and Amy
Klobuchar?
Frank Rich:
Trump's impeachment puts the Senate on trial.
Tony Romm:
Facebook and Google spent nearly half a billion on lobbying over the
past decade, new data shows.
David Roth:
The windbag of war: "Trump's boasts and lies about the conflict with
Iran perfectly encapsulate America's petty, TV-addled, and increasingly
degenerate president."
The strangest and most enduring misapprehension about Donald Trump is
that he has beliefs. He doesn't, or at least none beyond the lifelong
conviction that Donald Trump really should be on television more often.
Trump has his signature anxieties and appetites, numerous fears and a
few oafish ambitions, and a wide spectrum of ancient and unexamined
biases and bigotries, but he can claim nothing that rises anywhere near
to being an actual belief. The attempt to retroactively graft something
like a belief system onto the howling bottomless suckhole of Trump's
idiocy and need, from both sides of the political spectrum, is a joke
that stopped being funny long before Mark Levin sat in front of a fake
fireplace on Fox News and did his grandiloquent best to describe the
Trump Doctrine.
Aaron Rupar:
Greg Sargent:
A big tell in Trump's own legal brief exposes McConnell's coverup.
Jonah Shepp:
Brexit is finally happening, but the drama is far from over.
Henry Siegman:
Is Apartheid the inevitable outcome of Zionism? I'm always uncomfortable
with arguments about inevitability, but given that it's happened, it's hard
to see how it could have turned out differently. There was a division within
Zionism where Martin Buber, Joseph Magnes, and their circle tried to promote
a less political, more cultural ideal, but they never mad much of a chance
against David Ben-Gurion's socialist and his revisionist opponent-allies.
Maybe earlier on the British could have imposed a power-sharing framework,
but back then the British (as they were everywhere they set foot) were more
concerned with exploiting race and religion to perpetuate their own rule.
Jamil Smith:
Trump, guns, and white fragility: "What do the Senate impeachment
trial and the Virginia gun rally have in common?"
Felicia Sonmez/Elise Viebeck:
Schiff 'has not paid the price' for impeachment, Trump says in what
appears to be a veiled threat.
Nik Steinberg:
Even before Mike Pompeo's blowup, State Department insiders were feeling
undermined. Well, Trump's political appointees have been undermining
the professional civil service almost everywhere. Rex Tillerson started
this in the State Department: while he was less ideological than Pompeo,
he was remarkably careless, ignorant, and callous. Michael Lewis wrote
about several cases of this in The Fifth Risk. I have mixed views
on this happening in the State Dept., as what passed for professional
there was a lifelong commitment to anti-communism and neoliberalism --
the view that the sole purpose of US foreign policy is to secure business
opportunities for the globalized rich (especially those in oil, arms, and
finance). I could see doing some housecleaning there.
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins:
Martha Nussbaum thinks the so-called retreat of liberalism is an academic
fad. Interview with the philosopher on her latest book, The
Cosmopolitan Tradition: A Noble but Flawed Ideal, starting with
some dumb things that Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo) said.
Emily Stewart:
Hillary Clinton jumps into the 2020 primary by blasting Bernie Sanders.
Explaining her fact-challenged rant against Sanders, Clinton is quoted
as saying, "I thought everyone wanted my authentic, unvarnished views!"
Maybe if they revealed some conscious remorse for her shortcomings, but
just to remind us that deep down she's just another conceited asshole?
Not really.
Matt Stieb:
Bolton says Trump tied Ukraine aid to Biden investigation in book draft:
One thing that wasn't clear before now was why Bolton, having refused to
testify in the House, now wants to testify in the Senate. Evidently he
now sees it as part of his book promo tour.
Ratings show Americans don't care about the impeachment trial enough to
watch it.
Trump invites Israel, not Palestine, to discuss peace plan. This
is Jared Kushner's "plan," which nobody likes -- even Israelis don't
see the point, so it shouldn't be surprising that the first step is to
get the US-Israeli side onto the same page. Then they (well, probably
just Kushner) thinks they can ram a settlement they can call "peace"
down everyone's throats. Not that there's any urgency here, but note
the mug shots: one leader's impeached, the other's indicted. Both
could use the distraction.
At Daos, Trump says US is a 'developing nation too'.
Craig Timberg/Isaac Stanley-Becker:
Sanders supporters have weaponized Facebook to spread angry memes about
his Democratic rivals. This is probably meant to throw shade on
Bernie for unsportsmanlike conduct -- "No other Democrat's supporters
are engaged in behavior on a similar scale, which is more characteristic
of the online movement galvanized by Trump" -- although I have to wonder
whether this isn't an essential part of the skill-set necessary to run
against Trump and win. A while back, I was trying to figure out what
Democrats could do with Bloomberg's billion. I think I'd spend most of
it on ground game, and secondly on social media. (Bloomberg is putting
most of it into vanity TV ads, as if he's campaigning in the 1970s.)
Meanwhile, Trump is doubling down. See: John Harris:
Trump's greatest ally in the coming election? Facebook.
Alex Ward:
Libby Watson:
The elite media's Amy Klobuchar blind spot: "That so many people in
the pundit class promote a candidate credibly accused of being an abuse
boss says a lot about their regard for ordinary people." That dredges up
a story that made the rounds in the weeks after her announcement, but
hasn't been heard from since.
Alissa Wilkinson:
The Fight explores how the ACLU is navigating the Trump era through
4 key cases: "The documentary shows the hard, exhausting work of fighting
for civil and human rights."
Gabriel Winant:
No going back: The power and limits of the anti-monopolist tradition.
Review of Matt Stoller's book, Goliath: The 100-Year War Between
Monopoly Power and Democracy, roughly from the 1870s through the
1960s. With Reagan, anti-monopoly enforcement waned, while financiers
went on a spree buying up, combining, and carving up businesses to
reap more and more monopoly rents. Recently progressive Democrats have
started to talk about monopoly (and monopsony) again, partly because
anti-monopoly politics has always been rooted in a defense of markets
against corrupting power. (E.g., see Thomas Philippon: The Great
Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets.)
Robert Wright:
Tom Cotton, soldier in Bill Kristol's proxy war against evil.
Matthew Yglesias:
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Music Week
January archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 32640 [32614] rated (+26), 228 [229] unrated (-1).
Three days late with this, but the cutoff was late Sunday night,
so this is still an honest week's listening report. While I was not
honoring my self-imposed schedule, I did continue to listen, so my
scratch file for next week includes an additional 21 records -- a
pace which will probably top 40 next week. Maybe more: it's tempting
to run late next week so I can close January near the end of the
month (instead of final Monday, the 27th this year). I usually do
my
freeze exercise the end
of January: that being my signal to stop monitoring
EOY lists and move on
to the new year.
Actually, you'll find my first 2020 A- record below, as well as
a few more 2020 releases. Most of the CDs in my promo queue are
still future releases, so I'm noting release dates in cases that
aren't out yet. I noticed on Facebook Phil Freeman noting that he
already has over 100 promo records in his 2020 spreadsheet. I have
a quarter of that, but might not be so far behind if I downloaded
all the links that cross my mail. Thus far I've done none, but I
am pleased to be getting mail from Astral Spirits now.
I've added quite a bit of jazz to my EOY Aggregate, including the
NPR Jazz Critics Poll
totals for new albums and reissues, plus about two-thirds of the critic
ballots -- my first pass rule was to only list critics I had listed in
previous years. This has pushed Kris Davis' poll-winning Diatom
Ribbons to 33rd overall, the top-rated jazz album. I re-played the
record when the poll dropped, but didn't feel like raising my initial
B+(***) grade. I have maybe a dozen more records I feel like I should
retry -- mostly Christgau picks that I liked but didn't spend much time
with on first pass, like: Danny Brown, Stella Donnelly, The National,
The Paranoid Style, Purple Mountains, Rapsody. Not much elsewhere has
me wondering. Indeed, while my
tracking file shows that there are
literally thousands of unheard records that someone likes, I'm having
a lot of trouble identifying ones that seem promising for me.
I also added in the totals from something called
Pazz & Jop Rip-Off Poll. This is a fan poll which has existed
for twenty-some years, but got more attention this year with Village
Voice having abandoned their signature poll. I got an invite to join
a while back, but never voted. I did, however, go through the ballots,
and picked out fifty or so names I recognized -- mostly folks I had
counted ballots from in past years. In the past I've been inclined to
use P&J as an endpoint, testing how well my own lists anticipated
the results, and in the process finding various biases of the critics
polled. Still, nothing like what we see with this self-selected fan
community. Purple Mountains won in a landslide, as both hip-hop and
pop votes were pretty depressed. On the other hand, certain Christgau
favorites did surprisingly well (e.g., The Paranoid Style at 17, 75
Dollar Bill at 8).
New records reviewed this week:
Harry Allen/Mike Renzi: Rhode Island Is Famous for You
(2019, GAC): Tenor sax and piano, non-headliners on bass and drums.
Mostly standard fare, tending toward gorgeous.
B+(***)
Beans on Toast: Cushty (2017, Xtra Mile): English
folk singer Jay McAllister, has dropped an album on December 1 (his
birthday) every year since 2009, same cover design, titles differ.
More songs about politics than not, some too obvious, and some too
hyperbolic ("we talking end of days, proper apocalyptic shit").
B+(**)
Beans on Toast: A Bird in the Hand (2018, Beans on
Toast Music): Don't care for the lecture on "Bamboo Toothbrush,"
even as modest as it is, but something exceptionally beguiling
to this batch of music.
B+(***)
Beans on Toast: The Inevitable Train Wreck (2019,
Beans on Toast Music): English folksinger-songwriter Jay McAllister
doubles down on the politics. I could quibble on details, but his
heart and head are in the right place, and we're fortunate to have
him. The refrain about "leave it in the ground" is catchy enough
for a demonstration mob (although I wouldn't go so far as his dis
on cows). He also doubles down on the music: he's added keyboards
to his guitar in the past, but he's got a full band this time.
Rocks a little, concluding that "life goes on and on and on."
A-
Pip Blom: Boat (2019, Heavenly): Dutch jangle pop band,
same name as the singer-guitarist-songwriter -- will file them under her,
but does sound like a group.
B+(***)
Satoko Fujii Orchestra New York: Entity (2019 [2020],
Libra): Thirteen-piece big band, short some brass from standard big
bands, and no piano, the leader content to compose and conduct. All
name players -- not so hard to do in New York. Impressive when your
draw in close, otherwise can slip on by.
B+(***) [cd] [02-14]
Gordon Grdina/Matt Mitchell/Jim Black: Gordon Grdina's Nomad
Trio (2019 [2020], Skirl): Guitarist from Vancouver, also plays
oud, has a substantial body of work since 2006. Trio here with piano
and drums. The piano impresses with sharp angles, fading back for the
guitar, which never really takes charge.
B+(**) [cd]
Scott Hamilton Quartet: Danish Ballads . . . & More
(2019, Stunt): Tenor saxophonist, did a similar album of Swedish
Ballads in 2013, recorded this in Copenhagen, with Jan Lundgren
on piano and locals on bass and drums. Songbook appears to be mostly
Danish, with Oscar Pettiford's Montmartre Blues close enough.
A-
Scott Hamilton: Jazz at the Club: Live From Sociëtat De
Witte (2018 [2019], O.A.P.): Since his record deal with
Concord ran out a decade ago, the tenor saxophonist has wandered
the world, picking up sympathetic bands (almost all quartets), and
letting the tapes roll. Standard fare, he usually sounds terrific,
and the combos rarely disappoint. This one is from The Hague in
Netherlands, with Francesca Tandoi on piano and singing two tracks.
B+(***)
Scott Hamilton: Street of Dreams (2019, Blau):
Another tenor sax quartet, don't know when or where it was recorded,
but label is Spanish (one Hamilton has seven albums on), with Dena
DeRose on piano, Ignasi González on bass, and Jo Krause on drums.
Ballads may be a bit pinched, but the faster ones swing hard.
B+(***)
Irreversible Entanglements: Homeless/Global (2019,
International Anthem, EP): Phiadelphia group, released a fine debut
LP in 2017, released this 23:38 track in advance of a second album.
MC/poet Camae Ayewa enters after 7:35 of roiling freebop -- trumpet,
sax, bass, drums (Luke Stewart the only name I recognize).
B+(**) [bc]
Aly Keïta/Jan Galega Brönnimann/Lucas Niggli: Kalan Teban
2019 [2020], Intakt): Balafon player from Côte D'Ivoire, trio with
reeds and drums -- two Swiss musicians who were born in Cameroon and
have known each other since childhood. Their previous Kalo-Yele
was my favorite album of 2016. This is comparably delightful, notably
when Brönnimann takes charge.
A-
Peter Lemer Quintet: Son of Local Colour (2018 [2019],
ESP-Disk): British pianist, recorded an album in 1968 called Local
Colour, not much since but decided to get the band back together
for a 50th anniversary reunion, and got 4/5ths of the way: John Surman
(baritone/soprano sax), Tony Reeves (bass), and John Hiseman (drums),
with Alan Skidmore (tenor sax) filling in for the ailing Nisar Ahmad
Khan. They reprised all the old songs (assuming "City" + "Enahenado" =
"Ciudad Enahenado").
B+(**)
Andrew Munsey: High Tide (2019, Birdwatcher):
Drummer, from Califoria, seems to be his first album, although
he's appeared on close to a dozen, notably ones by his quintet
here: Steph Richards (trumpet/flugelhorn), Ochion Jewell (tenor
sax/kalimba), Amino Belyamani (piano/rhodes), and Sam Minaie
(double bass).
B+(**)
Rex Orange County: Pony (2019, RCA): English
singer-songwriter Alexander O'Connor, 21, debut album after a pair
of self-released downloadables. Clever guy, has some pop smarts.
B
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Burnt Sugar/The Arkestra Chamber: Twentieth Century
Mixtapes: Groiddest Schnizzits: Volume One (2001-17 [2019],
Trugroid/Avantgroidd): Founded in 1999 by Greg Tate and Jared Michael
Nickerson, released their first album in 2000, 15 more through 2017,
from which they've assembled three CDs of mixes -- I found Volume
Two shortly after release date, but One and Three
eluded me. Tate (I assume) is responsible for the creative titling,
and both for networking in dozens of New York musicians, reworking
black music traditions rooted in funk and free jazz, Butch Morris
providing the key "conduction" concept. Still, lot of vocals here.
B+(***)
Burnt Sugar/The Arkestra Chamber: Twentieth Century
Mixtapes: Groiddest Schnizzits: Volume Three (1999-2017
[2019], Trugroid/Avantgroidd): The thing about these "mixtapes"
is that rather than separate their remarkable body of work into
its various facets, or breaking it up into eras, highlighting
each major one on its own disc, they mix them all together. All
three are spread over two decades, each picks pretty much the
same music, and they're all somewhat biased toward soul vocals --
not what I would pick, although I imagine a single disc would be
possible that would eventually grow on me.
B+(***)
Miles Davis: The Lost Quintet (1969 [2019], Sleepy
Night): Bootleg, live date from November 9 in Rotterdam, touted as
Davis's "third great quintet," "lost" because it wasn't showcased
in a studio album, but not really that obscure: second quintet
saxophonist Wayne Shorter is still on hand, backed by a then young
but not legendary rhythm section: Chick Corea, Dave Holland, and
Jack DeJohnette -- all of whom were on hand for Bitches Brew
(recorded 1969, released 1970). Morever, they formed the quintet
on the 4-CD 2013 box Live in Europe 1969, which included a
November 5 date in Stockholm and another two days later in Berlin.
Four pieces -- two from Bitches Brew, the others also in
the box set -- stretched to 58:11. The thing that struck me about
the Live 1969 recordings is how seriously Davis and Shorter
considered plunging into the avant-garde, and this recording is
even more raggedly free. But with John McLaughlin, Davis was also
on a parallel track toward fusion, and that soon won out, with
Shorter and Corea soon leaving for their own inferior fusion
ventures. Sound is so-so here, but the rhythm section is really
smoking.
B+(***)
Smokey Haangala: Aunka Ma Kwacha (1976 [2019], Séance
Center): Zambian singer-songwriter, played keyboards, also wrote poetry
and journalism, died at 38 in 1988.
B+(*)
ICP Tentet: Tetterettet (1977 [2019], Corbett vs.
Dempsey): Dutch pianist Misha Mengelberg's Instant Composer's Pool,
later better known as ICP Orchestra. Full of grand gestures and sly
jokes, or in some cases gross ones, as they take stereotypical circus
music and transform it into extraordinary free jazz.
A- [bc]
Sun Ra Arkestra: Live in Kalisz 1986 (1986 [2019],
Languidity): Relatively late (Ra died in 1993, albums thin out from
1990), live in a small city in central Poland, released on a Polish
label named for another Sun Ra album. Always terrific when they
break out the interplanetary boogie, somewhat hit and miss, but
their 13:24 "Mack the Knife" is a real treat.
A- [bc]
Laurie Spiegel: Unseen Worlds (1991 [2019], Unseen
Worlds): A pioneer in electronic music, started with analog sythesizers
in 1969, worked at Bell Labs 1973-79 writing composition software,
founded New York University's Computer Music Studio. First record
was The Expanding Universe (1980). Not many more, but this
one was taken as the name of this label. The pieces, organized as
"Thesis," "Antithesis," and "Synthesis," with grand gestures that
I assume derive from classical music aesthetics, plus some piano
to settle things down.
A-
June Tyson: Saturnian Queen of the Sun Ra Arkestra
(1968-92 [2019], Modern Harmonic/Sundazed): Singer, worked with Sun
Ra over 25 years, until her death in 1992. No dates on these pieces,
so the range could be narrower, and no credits, although the Arkestra
was pretty stable for much of this period. Vocals were always an iffy
thing with the Arkestra, mostly space chants, conveniently collected
here.
B+(**)
Hank Williams: The Complete Health & Happiness Recordings
(1949 [2019], BMG, 2CD): Radio shots, eight 15-minute shows (including
patter but trimmed of advertising, about 12 minutes each), each opening
with "Happy Rovin' Cowboy" and signing off with "Sally Goodin'" -- in
between, expect at least one classic, some breaks and filler, and the
obligatory hymn. Remarkable sound, extraordinary voice, could be edited
down to an even more remarkable single CD.
[Probably identical to the 1993 Polygram 2-CD release of Health &
Happiness Shows.]
A-
Old music:
Harry Allen Quartet: London Date (2015 [2016], Trio):
Retro-swing tenor saxophonist, with a local London rhythm section
(Andrea Pozza, Simon Woolf, Steve Brown) playing standards. Most
impressive on the fast ones, but "Our Love Is Here to Stay" is
taken deliciously slow.
B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- John Ellis and Andy Bragen: The Ice Siren (Parade Light) [03-20]
- Gilfema: Three (Sounderscore) [04-03]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Weekend Roundup
Last week's 6-candidate mini-debate reminded us that the Iowa Caucuses
are fast approaching: February 3. It will be the first opportunity any
Americans have to vote for candidates, the remnants of a field that has
been reduced by half mostly through the whims of donors and the media.
Unfortunately, the Americans voting will be Iowans. I was reminded of
this by John Kerry, campaigning these days for Joe Biden. Kerry scored
a surprise win in Iowa in 2004, kicking off an ill-fated campaign that
resulted in a second term for GW Bush and Dick Cheney. As I recall, a
lot of weight then was put on the idea of "electability," with many of
Kerry's supporters figuring that Kerry's military record would sway
voters against Bush. They miscalculated then, yet they're still in
position to choose our fates.
I've been rather sanguine about the Democratic nominating process
so far, but closing in on the start of actual voting, everyone is
starting to get on my nerves. Even Sanders, who has by far the best
analyses and positions, and the most steadfast character, but who
I fear the media will never respect much less accept, and who will
be hounded repeatedly with mistruths and misunderstandings. (The
articles below that explicitly call out CNN will give you pretty
glaring examples of what I mean.) Even Warren seems to have decided
that the way to gain (or save) votes from Sanders is by resorting
to half-truths and innuendo. I discuss one example below, but the
whole pre-debate dust-up reflects very poorly on her, not least
because it was done in ways that leave scars over trivial issues.
Meanwhile Biden seems to be getting a free pass as he's blundering
along.
I haven't been bothered much by the so-called moderates' plans,
because no matter who wins it's effectively the right-most half of
the party in Congress that will be passing laws and setting policy.
But it does bother me that they've spent so much time trashing
Medicare for All. In don't have a problem advocating half-measures
to ameliorate the present system here and there, and figure that
as a practical matter that's how reform will have to happen, but
even the most reticent Democrat should realize that single-payer
would be a better solution, and is a necessary goal. They really
should acknowledge that, even if they doubt its practicality. But
instead they're attacking it on grounds of costs and/or choice,
which is simply ignorant.
I'm also rather sick of the "electability" issue, not least
because I'm convinced that no one really understands the matter,
because it's unprovable (except too late), and because it invites
strong opinions based on nothing more than gut instincts. Still,
I write about it several places below. Clearly, I have my own
opinions on the matter, but can offer no more proof for them
than you can for yours. I only wish to add here that one more
thing I believe is that the election will turn not on whether
the Democrats nominate one candidate or another but on whether
Americans are so sick and tired of Trump they'll vote for any
Democrat to spare themselves. And in that case, why not pick
the better Democrat?
Some scattered links this week:
Damian Carrington:
Ocean temperatures hit record high as rate of heating accelerates.
Also wrote:
Who do record ocean temperatures matter?
Jonathan Chait:
Aida Chávez:
Bernie Sanders's lonely 2017 battle to stop Iran sanctions and save the
nuclear deal.
Timothy Egan:
Trump's evil is contagious: "The president has shown us exactly what
happens when good people do nothing."
Lisa Friedman/Claire O'Neill:
Who controls Trump's environmental policy?: "Among 20 of the most
powerful people in government environment jobs, most have ties to the
fossil fuel industry or have fought against the regulations they are
now supposed to enforce." Names, faces, resumes. E.g., David Dunlap,
Deputy head of science policy at EPA, former chemicals expert for
Koch Industries, earlier VP of the Chlorine Institute (representing
producers and distributors); currently oversees EPA's pollution and
toxic chemical research.
Dan Froomkin:, in a series called Press Watch:
Masha Gessen:
The willful ambiguity of Putin's latest power grab.
Anand Giridharadas:
Why do Trump supporters support Trump? Book review of Michael Lind:
The New Class War: Saving Democracy From the Managerial Elite.
A fairly critical one, as the reviewer thinks Lind is a bit gullible
when he attributes economic fears to Trump voters.
Maya Goodfellow:
Yes, the UK media's coverage of Meghan Markle really is racist. We
just finished streaming this season of The Crown, which reaffirmed
our understanding that the British monarchy is a preposterous institution
inhabited by ridiculous people. The series reached the 25-year mark in
Elizabeth II's reign, finding her lamenting the steady decline of the
nation and the decay of its imperial pretensions, to which we could only
add that the next 25 (actually 40 now) years would be even worse for
British pretensions of grandeur. Few things interest me less than the
bickerings of the Windsors, or surprise me less than that the few who
still cling to monarchist fantasies would resort to racism when pushed
into a corner. Indeed, back in the 1990s when I worked for a while in
England, I was repeatedly struck by the casual racism of white Brits
(even those quick to frown on American racism).
Amy Goodman:
Phyllis Bennis on Dem debate: Support for combat troop withdrawal is
not enough to stop endless wars. Bennis noted:
You know, I think one of the things that was important to see last
night was that all of the Democratic candidates, including the right
wing of the group, as well as the progressives, as well as Bernie
Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, were vying with each other essentially
to see who could be more critical of the Iraq War. They all have said
that at various points, but last night it was very overt that this
was a critical point of unity for these candidates. Now, whether that
says much about the prospects for the Democratic Party is not so
clear, but I thought that was an important advance, that there's a
recognition of where the entire base of half this country is, which
is strongly against wars.
David Graeber:
The center blows itself up: Care and spite in the 'Brexit election'.
Sean Illing:
"Flood the zone with shit": How misinformation overwhelmed our democracy:
"The impeachment trial probably won't change any minds. Here's why." Not
his usual interview piece (although he cites interviews along the way).
Makes many important points; for example:
As Joshua Green, who wrote a biography of Bannon, explained, Bannon's
lesson from the Clinton impeachment in the 1990s was that to shape the
narrative, a story had to move beyond the right-wing echo chamber and
into the mainstream media. That's exactly what happened with the
now-debunked Uranium One story that dogged Clinton from the beginning
of her campaign -- a story Bannon fed to the Times, knowing that the
supposedly liberal paper would run with it because that's what
mainstream media news organizations do.
In this case, Bannon flooded the zone with a ridiculous story not
necessarily to persuade the public that it was true (although surely
plenty of people bought into it) but to create a cloud of corruption
around Clinton. And the mainstream press, merely by reporting a story
the way it always has, helped create that cloud.
You see this dynamic at work daily on cable news. Trump White House
adviser Kellyanne Conway lies. She lies a lot. Yet CNN and MSNBC have
shown zero hesitation in giving her a platform to lie because they see
their job as giving government officials -- even ones who lie -- a
platform.
Even if CNN or MSNBC debunk Conway's lies, the damage will be done.
Fox and right-wing media will amplify her and other falsehoods; armies
on social media, bot and real, will, too (@realDonaldTrump will no doubt
chime in). The mainstream press will be a step behind in debunking --
and even the act of debunking will serve to amplify the lies.
Umair Irfan:
Australia's weird weather is getting even weirder.
Malaika Jabali:
Joe Biden is still the frontrunner but he doesn't have to be.
"Biden is surviving on the myth that he's the most electable Democrat.
He's not."
Louis Jacobson:
The Democratic debates' biggest (electoral) losers, by the numbers.
Elizabeth Warren usually makes well-reasoned arguments to advance
carefully thought-out plans, but I found her debate point on the
superior electability of women (or maybe just Amy Klobuchar and
herself) to be remarkably specious and disingenuous. She said:
I think the best way to talk about who can win is by looking at
people's winning record. So, can a woman beat Donald Trump? Look
at the men on this stage. Collectively, they have lost 10 elections.
The only people on this stage who have won every single election
that they've been in are the women, Amy and me.
She went on to add that she was "the only person on this stage
who has beaten an incumbent Republican any time in the past 30
years." The time limit was especially critical there, as Bernie
Sanders defeated an incumbent Republican to win his House seat
in November 1990 -- 30 years ago, if you do some rounding up.
The time limit also excluded Joe Biden from comparison, as his
first Senate win (defeating Republican incumbent J. Caleb Boggs),
was in 1972, 48 years ago. One could also point out that Warren's
win over "Republican incumbent" Scott Brown in 2012 wasn't really
an upset: Brown had freakishly won a low turnout special election[1]
in 2010 in a heavily Democratic state -- the only one that had
rejected Reagan in 1984, one that hadn't elected a Republican to
the Senate since Edward Brooke (1967-79) -- which made him easy
pickings in 2012.
PolitiFact ruled that Warren's quoted statement was true, but
the only way they got to 10 was by counting three "ran and lost
for president" elections -- two for Biden (1988 and 2008), one
for Sanders (2016). Sanders had 6 of the other 7 losses, all from
early in his career, the House race in 1988 (against Peter Smith,
who he beat in 1990). The other loss was Pete Buttigieg's first
race, in 2010 for Indiana state treasurer, against a Republican
incumbent in a solidly Republican state. One could say lots of
things about this data set, but Warren's interpretation is very
peculiar and self-serving -- so much so I was reminded of the
classic sociology text, How to Lie With Statistics.
If you know anything about statistics, it's that sample size
and boundary conditions are critical. Comparing two women against
four men (one who's never run before, the other much younger so
he's only managed three races, two of them for mayor) isn't much
of a sample. The 30-years limit reduces it even more, excluding
a period when Biden and Sanders were undefeated. That's a lot of
tinkering just to make a point which is beside the point anyway.
When I go back to Warren's quote, the first thing that strikes me
is that the premise is unproven ("the best way to talk about who
can win is by looking at people's winning record") and frankly
suspect. I can think of dozens of counterexamples even within
narrowly constrained contexts, but that just distracts from the
larger problem: that running for president is vastly different
from running for Senator or Mayor. (Biden's experience running
for VP may count for something here, but not much.) Moreover,
running against Trump poses unique challenges, just because he's
so very different (as a campaigner, at least) from the Republicans
these candidates have faced and (more often than not) beat in the
past. In fact, the only data point we have viz. Trump is the 2016
presidential election, which showed that Hillary Clinton could not
beat him (at least in 2016 -- and please spare me the popular vote
numbers). Indeed, based on history, we cannot know what it takes
to beat Donald Trump, but if you wish to pursue that inquiry, all
you can really do is construct some metric of how similar each of
the candidates is to Clinton. Even there, the most obvious points
are likely to be misleading: Clinton is a woman, and had a long
career as a Washington insider cozy to business interests (like,
well, I hardly need to attach names here). On the other hand,
Trump today isn't the same as Trump in 2016. Still, there is
some data on this question, not perfect, but better than the
mental gymnastics Warren is offering: X-vs-Trump polls, which
pretty consistently show Biden and/or Sanders as the strongest
head-to-head anti-Trump candidates. Maybe they could falter
under the intense heat of a Trump assault. Maybe some other
candidate, once they become better known, could do as well.
But at least that polling is based on real, relevant data --
a far cry from Warren's ridiculous debate argument.
[1]: Brown got 51.9% of 2,229,039 votes in 2010; in 2012, with
Obama at the head of the ticket, Warren got 53.7% of 3,154,394
votes, so turnout in the special election was only 70.6% of what
it was in the regular election. Aside from the turnout difference,
Obama/Biden carried Massachusetts in 2012 with 60.7%, leading
Warren by 7 points -- one could say she coasted in on their
coattails. Warren did raise her margin in 2018, to 60.4%, a bit
better than Clinton's 60.0% in 2016.
Sarah Jones:
Ed Kilgore:
No Senator is less popular in their own state than Susan Collins:
Yeah, but when she loses in 2020, she'll never have to go there again.
She can hang her shingle out as a lobbyist and start collecting the
delayed gratuities she is owed for selling out her constituents and
what few morals she ever seemed to profess.
Catherine Kim:
New evidence shows a Nunes aide in close conversation with Parnas.
Jen Kirby:
Trump signed a "phase one" trade deal with China. Here's what's in it --
and what's not.
Ezra Klein:
The case for Elizabeth Warren: Second in Vox's slow release of
"best-case" arguments for presidential candidates, following
Matthew Yglesias on Bernie Sanders.
Eric Levitz:
Joe Biden's agreeable, terrific, very good, not at all bad week.
But, by all appearances, the fact that Biden is no longer capable of
speaking in proper English sentences will be no impediment to his
political success -- in the Democratic primary, anyway.
Bernie isn't trying to start a class war. The rich are trying to finish
one.
Trump tax cuts gave $18 billion bonus to big banks in 2019.
Bernie Sanders' foreign policy is too evidence-based for the Beltway's
taste.
The fundamental cause of all this rabid irrationality is simple: America's
foreign-policy consensus is forged by domestic political pressures, not
the dictates of reason. Saudi Arabia's oil reserves may no longer be
indispensable to the U.S. economy, but its patronage remains indispensable
to many a D.C. foreign-policy professional. Israel may no longer be a
fledgling nation-state in need of subsidization, but it still commands
the reflexive sympathy of a significant segment of the U.S. electorate.
Terrorism may not actually be a top-tier threat to Americans' public
safety, but terrorist attacks generate more media coverage than fatal
car accidents or deaths from air pollution, and thus, are a greater
political liability than other sources of mass death. And the Pentagon
may have spent much of the past two decades destabilizing the Middle
East and green-lighting spectacularly exorbitant and ill-conceived
weapons systems, but the military remains one of America's only trusted
institutions, and its contracts supply a broad cross section of capital
with easy profits, and a broad cross section of American workers with
steady jobs.
5 takeaways from the Democratic debate in Iowa:"
- Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren's friendship has seen better days.
- In hindsight, Joe Biden probably shouldn't have voted for the Iraq War.
- Tom Steyer wants you to know that he will put his children's future above
"marginal improvements for working people." [This, by the way, is an
unfair and misleading dig at Steyer for opposing USMCA. Given that
Steyer is famous as a billionaire, you might think "his children's
future" has something to with the estate tax, but (like Sanders) he
is rejecting USMCA for its failure to make any positive step toward
limiting climate change.]
- Amy Klobuchar made one-half of a very good point. [But only as part
of "an argument against tuition-free public college."]
- Iowans' fetishization of politeness (and/or, the Democratic field's
political cowardice) is a huge gift to Biden.
Ian Millhiser:
Jim Naureckas/Julie Hollar:
The big loser in the Iowa debate? CNN's reputation.
Heather Digby Parton:
Lev Parnas spins wild tales of Trumpian corruption -- and we know most
of them are true.
Daniel Politi:
Trump targets Michelle Obama's signature school nutrition guidelines on
her birthday.
Andrew Prokop:
Lev Parnas's dramatic new claims about Trump and Ukraine, explained.
Matthew Rozsa:
One-term presidents: Will Donald Trump end up on this ignominious
list? Various things I'd qibble with, starting with "the list
starts out well" -- I'd agree that John Adams and John Quincy Adams
were great Americans with mostly distinguished service careers, but
the former's Alien and Sedition Acts were one of the most serious
assaults ever on democracy, and his lame duck period was such a
disgrace that Trump will be hard-pressed to top -- and his decision
to omit one-termers who didn't run for a second, like the lamentable
John Buchanan. But this dovetails nicely with one of my pet theories:
that American history can be divided into eras, each starting with
a major two-term president (Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Roosevelt,
and, sad to say, Reagan) and each ending with a one-term disaster
(Adams, Buchanan, Hoover, Carter, Trump?). I can't go into detail
here, but will note that each of these eras ended in profound
partisan divides, based on real (or imagined) crises in faith in
hitherto prevailing orthodoxies. That's certainly the case today.
The Reagan-to-Trump era is anomalous in its drive to ever greater
levels of inequality, corruption, and injustice, which have found
their apotheosis in Trump.
Aaron Rupar:
William Saletan:
Trump is a remorseless advocate of crimes against humanity.
Jon Schwarz:
Key architect of 2003 Iraq War is now a key architect of Trump Iran
policy: Remember David Wurmser? He was a major author of the 1996
neocon bible A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
(which advocated "pre-emptive strikes against Iran and Syria"), author
of the 1999 book Tyranny's Ally: America's Failure to Defeat Saddam
Hussein, worked for VP Dick Cheney, helped "stovepipe" intelligence
in the build-up to the Iraq War. After Bush, he cooled his heels in the
employ of right-wing think tanks, then landed a Trump administration
job thanks to John Bolton.
Dylan Scott:
The Netherlands has universal health insurance -- and it's all private:
Sure, you can make that work. Their system is much like Obamacare, with
an individual mandate and "a strongly regulated market," so "more than 99
percent" are covered, insurance companies have few options to rip off
their customers. Also "almost every hospital is a nonprofit," and subject
to government-imposed cost constraints. None of this proves that the Dutch
system is better than other systems with single-payer insurance, but that
it would be an improvement over America's insane system. TR Reid wrote an
eye-opening book on health care systems around the world, showing there
are lots of workable systems with various wrinkles: The Healing of
America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care
(2009). I don't recall much from Netherlands there, but he did especially
focus on Taiwan and Switzerland, because they were relative late-adopters,
and their systems were implemented by right-of-center governments. The
Swiss system basically kept everything private, but imposed strict profit
limits. Until then, Switzerland had the second highest health care costs
in the world (after the US, which it had tracked closely). Afterwards,
Swiss costs held flat -- still the second most expensive, but trailing
the US by a growing gap. So, sure, the Swiss came up with a better system
than they had (or we have now), but one that's still much more expensive,
with slightly worse results, than countries like France and Japan, which
seem to have found a better balance between cost and care. [PS: For
another data point, see Melissa Healy:
US health system costs four times more to run than Canada's single-payer
system.]
Tamsin Shaw:
William Barr: The Carl Schmitt of our Time. You know, the eminent
Nazi jurist and political theoretician.
Emily Shugerman:
Trump just hired Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers: Alan Dershowitz and
Kenneth Starr -- I'm not even sure Epstein was the low point of either
legal career (even if we don't count Trump yet). Many more articles
point this out. One that seems to actually be onto something is:
Laura Ingraham praises Trump for putting together a legal team
straight from "one of our legal panels".
Andrew Sullivan:
Is there a way to acknowledge America's progress? He makes a fairly
substantial list of things that do mark progress (certainly compared to
when I was growing up), yet, as he's very aware, there's Trump, his cabal
of Republicans, and the moneyed forces that feed and feast on his and
their corruption. If those who oppose such trends tend to overstate the
peril of the moment, it's because we see future peril so very clearly.
Still, I reckon those who can't (or won't) see anything troublesome at
all will find the hyperbole disconcerting, and I don't know what to do
about that, beyond trying to remain calm and reasoned. This piece is
followed by "But can they beat Trump?": where Sullivan tries to weigh
the Democratic field purely on electability consideration. He's most
withering on Warren, and most sympathetic to Biden, but gives Sanders
the edge in the end. His list of positives is worth reading:
I have to say he's grown on me as a potential Trump-beater. He seems
more in command of facts than Biden, more commanding in general than
Buttigieg or Klobuchar, and far warmer than Elizabeth Warren. He's a
broken clock, but the message he has already stuck with for decades
might be finding its moment. There's something clarifying about having
someone with a consistent perspective on inequality take on a president
who has only exacerbated it. He could expose, in a gruff Brooklyn accent,
the phony populism, and naked elitism of Trump. He could appeal to the
working-class voters the Democrats have lost. He could sincerely point
out how Trump has given massive sums of public money to the banks,
leaving crumbs for the middle class. And people might believe him.
On the other hand, he argues that "the oppo research the GOP throws
at him could be brutal," and gives examples that impress me very little.
Most of them are sheer red-baiting, and I have to wonder how effective
that ploy still is. Sure, many liberals of my generation and earlier
find this very scary, but well after the Cold War such charges have
lost much of their tangible fear -- even those liberals who still hate
Russia must realize that the problem there now is oligarchs like Trump,
not Bolshevik revolutionaries. Sure, Trump attacking Bernie is going
to be nasty and brutish, but I expect it will be less effective than
Trump attacking Biden as a crooked throwback to the Washington swamp
of the Clintons and Obama -- charges that Bernie is uniquely safe from.
There's also a third piece here, "Of royalty, choice, and duty," about
you-know-what.
Chance Swaim/Jonathan Shorman:
Kansas energy company abandons plans for $2.2 billion coal power plant.
This is a pretty big victory for envrionment-conscious Kansans, but
the irony is that it comes at a point when virtually all political
obstacles against been overcome. In the end, the company decided
that coal-fired electricity is simply a bad investment. Kansans
have followed this story for more than a decade, at least since
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius halted development on the plant expansion.
After she left to join Obama's cabinet, her successor reversed
course, and Gov. Sam Brownback was a big booster, but Obama's EPA
became an obstacle. Under Trump, all the political stars have
aligned to promote coal, but the economics have shifted so much
that coal use is declining all across the nation. Despite frantic
efforts by the Kochs and Trump, wind power has become a major
source of electricity in Kansas (fossil fuels account for less
than half of Kansas electricity -- nuclear also helps out there).
And thanks to Obama's support for fracking, natural gas has also
become cheaper relative to coal. So it looks like we've lucked
out, and been spared from the worst effects of having so corrupt
a political system in Topeka and Washington. For that matter,
Sunflower Electric Power Corp. has lucked out too, being saved
from such a bad investment.
Matt Taibbi:
CNN's debate performance was villainous and shameful: "The 24-hour
network combines a naked political hit with a cynical ploy for ratings."
Peter Wade:
Alex Ward:
11 US troops were injured in Iran's attack. It shows how close we came
to war.
Trump wanted to repeal an anti-corruption law so US businesses could bribe
foreigners. Based on a new book by Washington Post reporters Philip
Rucker and Carol Leonnig: A Very Stable Genius: Donald J Trump's
Testing of America. For more, see: Ashley Parker:
New book portrays Trump as erratic, 'at times dangerously uninformed'.
Also, by the authors, Carol D Leonnig/Philip Rucker:
'You're a bunch of dopes and babies': Inside Trump's stunning tirade
against generals. For another book review, see Dwight Garner:
A meticulous account of Trump's tenure reads like a comic horror
story. Also see the comment by Steve M:
In which I normalize Trump, up to a point, which quotes from the
above, and adds:
Well, actually, it is normal. Trump is a Republican. Both conservatives
and the mainstream media agree that a Republican can't insult the troops,
by definition. Only Democrats (and people to the left of the Democrats)
can insult the troops.
This is part of a larger problem that's plagued us over the past
forty years. The world of politics has been incapable of reacting with
sufficient outrage to Iran-contra, George W. Bush's post-9/11 toadying
to the Saudis and Iraq War debacle, and Trump's Putin bootlicking
because, performatively, Reagan, W, and Trump were all military-lovers
and flag-wavers. The conventional wisdom is that right-wingers are
correct: The telltale sign of disloyalty to America is insufficient
jingoism. If you're a Republican, you're never a menace to America,
even if you're actively doing it harm.
21 Saudi military trainees in the US are being sent home for anti-US
media and child porn. Evidently the two traits weren't mutually
exclusive, as the subsets numbered 17 and 15. Real reason was the
Saudi trainee who went on a shooting spree
at a Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Florida. Said trainee was
killed, so isn't one of the 21.
Trump has apparently wanted to kill Soleimani for quite a while -- since
as far back as 2017.
Libby Watson:
Let them fight!: "A great nation deserves a raucous and argumentative
primary, not a fake demonstration of unity." Choice line here: "If Warren
saw this as a way to innocuously smarm her way to the top . . ."
Matthew Yglesias:
Joe Biden skates by again. Notes that none of the other candidates
are really attacking Biden, who remains the front-runner:
This pattern of behavior raises, to me, a real worry about a potential
Biden presidency. Not that his talk of a post-election Republican Party
"epiphany" is unrealistic -- every candidate in the field is offering
unrealistic plans for change -- but that he has a taste for signing on
to bad bargains. There's potential for a critique of Biden that isn't
just about nitpicking the past or arguing about how ambitious Democrats
should be in their legislative proposals, but about whether Biden would
adequately hold the line when going toe-to-toe with congressional
Republicans.
Karen Zraick:
Jet crash in Iran has eerie historical parallel: You mean in 1988,
when the US "accidentally" shot down an Iranian airliner, killing 290
people? Doesn't excuse this time, nor does this time excuse that time.
Both were unintended consequences of deliberate decisions to engage in
supposedly limited hostilities. They reflect the fact that the people
who made those decisions are unable to foresee where their acts will
take them and/or simply do not care. And while it's difficult to weigh
relative culpability, the fact that the US alone sent its forces half-way
around the world to screw up must count for something. For more examples,
see Ron DePasquale:
Civilian planes shot down: A grim history.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Monday, January 13, 2020
Music Week
January archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 32614 [32575] rated (+39), 229 [230] unrated (+0).
I've finally heard that NPR's Jazz Critics Poll will be published
tomorrow (Tuesday) morning at 10 AM. I've been given advance URLs for
the
poll results and for the accompanying
essay by Francis Davis.
No time to write much more.
December Streamnotes
still not indexed.
EOY Aggregate still a work in progress. My own EOY lists for
Jazz and
Non-Jazz still
growing. Did play a couple of 2020 releases last week. Going
back and forth between the
2020 and
2019 tracking files reminds
me of the cartoon depictions of the decrepit old man representing
the old year giving way to the new year baby. Every year we get
older, but 2019 hurt more than most.
New records reviewed this week:
Franck Amsallem: Gotham Goodbye (2018 [2019], Jazz
& People): French pianist, born in Algeria in 1961, grew up in
Nice, moved to New York in 1986, back to France in 2001. Has a dozen
albums since 1990, this a lush postbop quartet with Irving Acao most
impressive on tenor sax.
B+(***)
John Bailey: Can You Imagine? (2019 [2020], Freedom
Road): Trumpet player, wrote something he calls "President Gillespie
Suite," but doesn't provide any words to advance his cause. Only real
drawback I see is that he's dead, but late in life he filled admirers
with the sort of awe presidents once enjoyed (well, at least before
Nixon). Bailey gets some nice trumpet in here, but pretty regularly
gets smoked by his saxophonist, Stacy Dillard.
B+(**) [cd] [01-20]
Lea Bertucci: Resonant Field (2017 [2019], NNA Tapes):
Composer/sound artist, based in New York, main instrument is alto sax,
but more important here is a large grain silo which frames everything
in echo and resonance.
B+(*)
Black to Comm: Seven Horses for Seven Kings (2019,
Thrill Jockey): Marc Richter, based in Hamburg, Germany, close to a
dozen albums since 2006, one namechecking Coldplay, Elvis &
John Cage (2011). Leftfield electronica: dense, harsh, menacing.
B
Boy Harsher: Careful (2019, Nude Club): Electropop
duo, beats reminiscent of the new wave 1980s (OMD, New Order, Cabaret
Voltaire) but more claustrophobic, something they're calling darkwave.
Haven't deciphered many words, but the beat goes on and on and on.
A-
Bremer/McCoy: Utopia (2019, Luaka Bop): Danish duo,
Jonathan Bremer plays bass, Morten McCoy piano, fourth album together.
Easy listening: pretty, soothing, nothing more.
B
Diabel Cissokho: Rhythm of the Griot (2019, Kafou
Music): Kora master from Senegal, "part of the great line of Cissokho
griots," fifth album. I find it a bit awkward.
B+(**)
Theo Croker: Star People Nation (2019, Sony
Masterworks): Trumpet player, born in Florida, spent seven years
in China before landing in Los Angeles. Second album was In
the Tradition for Arbors, but since 2014 he's moved toward
hip-hop fusion, with mixed results. Rarely a plus when someone
sings.
B
Czarface: The Odd Czar Against Us (2019, Silver
Age): Wu-Tang rapper Inspectah Deck, with the self-sufficient duo
7L & Esoteric, eighth album together since 2013, on their own
again after meet-ups with MF Doom and Ghostface Killah. Mad comic
cover art, songs that are dynamic and funny, often built on killer
riffs.
A-
Czarface: A Double Dose of Danger (2019, Silver Age,
EP): Bears the group credit, but just a 10-cut, 28:26 instrumental
album that fell through the cracks, released just after the group's
Ghostface session.
B+(*)
Jeff Davis: The Fastness (2019, Fresh Sound New
Talent): Drummer, based in New York, originally from Colorado,
formerly married to pianist Kris Davis. Sixth album since 2010,
With tenor/soprano saxophonist Tony Malaby, reminding me of his
scene-stealing form on the early Kris Davis Quartet records,
plus Russ Lossing (keyboards), Jonathan Goldberger (guitar),
and Eivind Opsvik (bass).
B+(***)
Bertrand Denzler/Dominic Lash: Pivot (2019, Spoonhunt):
Tenor sax and bass duo. One 31:21 piece, not much to it, drone-like.
B- [bc]
Mr Eazi: Life Is Eazi, Vol. 2: Lagos to London
(2018, Banku Music): Nigerian singer, at least born there, but
started in Ghana, titling his previous one Life Is Eazi, Vol.
1: Accra to Lagos. Beats bounce more like reggae than highlife,
slips up once in a while, but much of this is very attractive.
B+(***)
Ekiti Sound: Abeg No Vex (2019, Crammed Discs):
Nigerian producer Leke Awayinka, first album, raps some over
electro-beats. Lots of ideas here, most work, some don't.
B+(**)
Go: Organic Orchestra & Brooklyn Raga Massive: Ragmala:
A Garland of Ragas (2018 [2019], Meta): Big project, "composed
and improvisationally conducted" by percussionist Adam Rudolph, who
concludes: "This album feels like the culmination of everything I've
been reaching for throughout my career." Massive indeed, with forty
musicians credited.
B+(***)
Laurence Hobgood: Tesseterra (2019, Ubuntu Music):
Pianist, from North Carolina, musical director for Kurt Elling,
several albums since 2000. Piano trio plus string quartet ETHEL,
some tricky covers ("Wichita Lineman," "Blackbird," Ravel, Debussy,
Sting), doesn't seem promising but somehow works.
B+(**)
Christopher Hollyday & Telepathy: Dialogue (2019
[2020], Jazzbeat Productions): Alto saxophonist, from Connecticut,
recorded four albums 1989-93 then took a long break after his label
folded. Returns here with a spry hard bop quintet.
B+(**) [cd] [01-17]
Ibibio Sound Machine: Doko Mien (2019, Merge): British
electropop group, formed by producers with the idea of fusing elements
from 1990s drum & bass with 1980s Afrobeat. They then recruited
London-born Nigerian singer Eno Williams, Ghanaian guitarist Alfred
Bannerman, and various horns and percussionists. Third album, true to
formula.
B+(**)
Michael Janisch: Worlds Collide (2019, Whirlwind):
Bassist, from Wisconsin, studied in Boston, moved to New York, then
to London. Large postbop group with trumpet (Jason Palmer), two saxes
(George Crowley and John O'Gallagher), guitar (Rez Abbasi), keyboards
(John Escreet), and two drummers, the leader playing electric as well
as acoustic bass. Up for fusion, but fancier.
B+(**)
Lauren Jenkins: No Saint (2019, Big Machine): Country
singer-songwriter, from Texas, first album (after an EP), knows her
tropes, has a voice and sounds plenty authentic.
B+(**)
Henry Kaiser/Anthony Pirog/Jeff Sipe/Tracy Silverman/Andy West:
Five Times Surprise (2018 [2019], Cuneiform): Two guitarists,
six-string electric violin, drums, six-string bass.
B+(**) [dl]
Egil Kalman & Fredrik Rasten: Weaving a Fabric of Winds
(2019, Shhpuma): Swedish bassist, plays modular synthesizer here, in
two long duets with the guitarist, based in Oslo and Berlin. Guitar
slowly picks, against subtle background shading.
B
Sarathy Korwar: More Arriving (2019, The Leaf Label):
Drummer, born in US, grew up in India, based in London but recorded
some of this in Mumbai. In London he fits in with an expansive jazz
scene, but this sounds more like hip-hop, especially with an array
of rappers from India, but also note some fine sax leads, and lots
of exotic percussion.
A-
Kim Lenz: Slowly Speeding (2019, Blue Star): Rockabilly
singer, recorded four albums as Kim Lenz & the (or Her) Jaguars.
Slows it down here, but keeps the grit and the smoldering heat.
B+(**)
Christian Lillinger: Open Form for Society (2018
[2019], Plaist Music): German drummer, has appeared -- rarely
first but often with his name on the banner -- in quite a few
albums since 2009, and pulls much of his circle together tight:
three pianists, two mallet players, two bass players, cello, and
scattered electronics. Many rough edges, emphasis on percussion,
although the piano leads are striking.
B+(***)
Brian Lynch Big Band: The Omni-American Book Club: My
Journey Through Literature in Music (2019, Hollistic
MusicWorks): Trumpet player from Wisconsin, started out as a
mainstream guy, playing hard bop with Horace Silver and Art
Blakey, got a taste for big bands with Toshiko Akiyoshi, and
most importantly for Latin music with Eddie Palmieri, turning
into a specialist. All that is evident here. Sure, there are
tics that turn me off, but he invariably bounces back with
something wondrous. Less evident from the music is his reading
list, which pairs two authors for each of nine songs -- some
examples: David Levering Lewis and W.E.B. DuBois, Ned Sublette
and Eric Hobsbawm, Naomi Klein and Mike Davis, Amiri Baraka
and A.B. Spellman.
A-
Brad Mehldau: Finding Gabriel (2017-18 [2019],
Nonesuch): Pianist, has mostly done trios since 1993, opts for the
kitchen sink this time, with scattered horns and strings, blustery
swells of sound, and voices on most songs. It escapes being awful --
indeed, has its moments, especially the saxophones (2 cuts).
B
Microtub: Chronic Shift (2018 [2019], Bohemian Drips):
"A trio of tuba players focusing on microtonality": fourth release, with
Robin Hayward, Martin Taxt, and Peder Simonsen. Two pieces, barely tops
30 minutes. While the ambience is pleasing enough, it's unlikely you'd
identify this as tuba music, let alone three instruments.
B
J. Pavone String Ensemble: Brick and Mortar (2019,
Birdwatcher): Jessica Pavone, plays viola here, violin elsewhere;
studied with Anthony Braxton, teaming up with Mary Halvorson on
several projects. Ensemble here has two violins and two violas,
a fairly narrow range, with harsh tones that rattle my nerves.
B
The Regrettes: How Do You Love? (2019, Warner
Brothers): Los Angeles garage pop band, led by Lydia Night,
second album, brash and catchy.
B+(***)
Mark Ronson: Late Night Feelings (2019, RCA):
Pop producer, I guess, born in England, raised in New York, also
lives in Los Angeles. Records feature guest singers: Miley Cyrus
and Angel Olsen the most famous, Yebba and Lykke Li get the most
work. The stars are the most distinctive, which means they seem
the most out of place.
B+(*)
Gary Smulyan & Ralph Moore Quintet: Bird's Eye
Encounter! (2018 [2019], Fresh Sound): Two saxophonists,
baritone and tenor, recorded live in Basel, Switzerland, backed
by Olivier Hutman (piano), Stephan Kurmann (bass), and Bernd
Reiter (drums). Moore was one of my favorite mainstream saxmen
in the 1990s, but seems to have vanished after 1996. He's less
distinctive here than Smulyan, as they romp through a nice set
of hard bop covers.
B+(**)
Jim Snidero: Project-K (2019 [2020], Savant):
Alto saxophonist, seems to have passed through a portal and found
himself in a Dave Douglas project. Aside from the trumpeter, the
band includes Orrin Evans (piano), Linda May Han Oh (bass), Rudy
Royston (drums), and Do Yeon Kim (gayaguem, a Korean zither).
Feels fractured, or quirky, with some potential upside.
B+(***) [cd] [01-24]
Earl Sweatshirt: Feet of Clay (2019, Tan Cressida/Warner,
EP): Odd Future rapper, Thebe Neruda Kgositsile, born in Chicago, based
in Los Angeles, father a South African poet and political activist. Short
(7 songs, 15:26), cryptic. Rhythm swims upstream. Maybe life's like that?
B+(*)
Tuba Skinny: Some Kind-a-Shake (2018 [2019],
self-released): New Orleans trad jazz band, members started busking
around 2005, cut their eponymous debut in 2009, and have released
an album most years since. Todd Burdick's sousaphone looms large.
Several vocals.
B+(***)
William Tyler: Goes West (2019, Merge): Guitarist,
considered folk (not unlike John Fahey) although not clear to me that
his primitivism runs very deep. Maybe because, given the choice, he
so often opts for lush.
B+(**)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Endless Boogie: Vol. I, II (2005 [2019], No Quarter,
2CD): Rock jam band from Brooklyn, name from a John Lee Hooker album,
formed eight years before they committed to wax two 3-song LPs (second
side of each is a single 25-minute piece). Vocals here and there, but
are secondary to the two-guitar grind, which is muscular enough to
hold up for 25-minute runs.
A-
Martial Solal: And His Orchestra: 1956-1962 (1956-62
[2019], Fresh Sound): French pianist, emerged as a major figure in
the early 1950s, presented here in large groups from nine to eighteen
pieces. Some of France's top players, plus US refugees like Lucky
Thompson and Kenny Clarke, but the piano is what you focus on.
B+(**)
Horace Tapscott With the Pan-Afrikan Peoples Arkestra: Flight
17 (1978 [2019], Nimbus/Outernational): First record from the
pianist's Los Angeles community organizing project, originally listing
him as "conductor." Brilliant in spots, the piano (of course), also
the drums.
[Played 2014 reissue from Nimbus West bandcamp.]
B+(***) [bc]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Delfeayo Marsalis Uptown Jazz Orchestra: Jazz Party (Troubadour Jass) [02-07]
- John Vanore: Primary Colors (Acoustical Concepts) [02-07]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Weekend Roundup
As actual voting is just around the corner, I've started to stray from
my no-campaign pledge. Part of this is that my wife has gotten much more
involved, and is regularly reporting social media posts that rile her up.
She's strong for Bernie, and I've yet to find any reason to argue with her.
Several pieces below argue that only X can beat Trump. For the record, I
don't believe that is true. I think any of the "big four" can win -- not
that there won't be momentary scares along the way. Trump has some obvious
assets that he didn't have in 2016: complete support of the Republican
political machine, which has been remarkably effective at getting slim
majorities to vote against their interests and sanity; so much money
he'll be tempted to steal most of it; and even more intense love from
his base. On the other hand, he has a track record this time, and he's
never registered an instant where his approval rating has topped 44%.
Plus I have this suspicion that one strong force that drives elections
is fear of embarrassment. Thanks to the Hillary Clinton's unique path
to the nomination, that worked for Trump in 2016, but no one on the
Democratic side of the aisle is remotely as embarrassing as Trump --
well, Michael Bloomberg, maybe. He's the only "major" candidate I can
see Trump beating. Indeed, if he somehow manages to buy the Democratic
nomination, I could see myself voting for a third party candidate.
I'm not saying he would be worse than Trump, but a Democratic Party
under him would never be able to right the wrongs of the last 40+
years.
One indication of the current political atmosphere is that Trump's
"wag the dog" attack on Iran didn't budge public opinion in the least
(except, perhaps, in favor of Bernie among the Democrats). Trump walked
back his war-with-Iran threat, no doubt realizing that the US military
had no desire to invade and occupy Iran, and possibly seeing that the
random slaughter of scattered air attacks would merely expose him
further as a careless monster. Still, he did nothing to resolve the
conflict, and won't as long as his Saudi and Israeli foreign policy
directors insist on hostile relations. He sorely needs a consigliere,
like James Baker was to Bush Sr., someone who could follow up on his
tantrums and turn them into deals (that could have been made well
before). All he really needs to do to open up Iran and North Korea
is to let the sanctions go first, to establish some good will, and
let those countries be sucked into normalcy with mutually beneficial
trade. Most other foreign policy conflicts could be solved without
much more effort. And he has one advantage that no Democrat will:
he won't have a psycho like Donald Trump constantly attacking him
from the right, arguing that every concession he makes is a sign of
weakness. The only deal he's delivered so far (USMCA) is a fair test
case. It sailed through without serious objection because the only
person deranged enough to derail it kept his mouth shut.
More links on Iran, war, and foreign policy:
Zack Beauchamp:
Trump's "Mission Accomplished" moment?
Frank Bruni:
Tucker Carlson is not your new best friend: "The Fox News host's
antiwar stance doesn't erase all that other ugliness."
James Carden:
Will this billionaire-funded think tank get its war with Iran?
"The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies' militaristic influence
on US policy toward Iran is working. Suleiman's assassination is evidence
of that."
Jane Coaston:
The Iraq War hawks are back: "Some of the biggest backers of the Iraq
War sure have a lot of opinions on Iran."
Patrick Cockburn:
The West is still buying into nonsense about Iran's regional influence.
Sean Collins/Jen Kirby:
A Ukrainian plane crashed in Iran: What we know: "Iran has admitted
to accidentally shooting down the plane."
Ryan Cooper:
Sarah Ferris:
'History has proven her right': Barbara Lee's anti-war push succeeds on
Iran.
Karen J Greenberg:
Killing Qassim Suleimani was illegal. And predictable. As this
piece notes, America's history of assassinating foreign leaders goes
back at least to 1960, with Patrice Lumumba ("success") and Fidel
Castro ("failed"), but had been prohibited in 1976, and only returned
to favor with GW Bush's Global War on Terror. I'd add that what really
turned it into fashion was envy of Israel's "targeted killings," which
really picked up in the 1980s.
Shane Harris/Josh Dawsey/Dan Lamothe/Missy Ryan:
'Launch, launch, launch': Inside the Trump administration as the
Iranian missiles began to fall. Key point here is that Iran
tipped off Iraq well before the missile strike, and Iraq passed
the information on to the US, so as to minimize casualties. Zero
casualties made it easier for Trump to stand down after the strike,
which was evidently just for show. As I recall, Trump did the same
thing, tipping Russia on a big US strike against a Syrian air base:
another big show that did little effective damage.
John Hudson/Missy Ryan/Josh Dawsey:
On the day US forces killed Soleimani, they targeted a senior Iranian
official in Yemen. They missed, but they did hit someone. For more,
see: Alex Emmons:
US strike on Iranian commander in Yemen the night of Suleimani's
assassination killed the wrong man.
Sean Illing:
The case against killing Qassem Soleimani: Interview with Dina
Esfandiary. Vox paired this with
The case for killing Qassem Soleimani, where Alex Ward interviewed
Bilal Saab. Both are so-called experts (Saab a former Trump flunky),
sharing a lot of DC groupthink about Iran (and the US -- the "against"
case regards Iran as every bit as evil and duplicitous as "for" does).
No one dares venture that a reason to argue against the killing is that
it's bad (both practically and, dare we say?, morally) for any country
to go around killing people in other countries.
Fred Kaplan:
Samya Kullab/Qassam Abdul-Zahra:
US dismisses Iraq request to work on a troop withdrawal plan.
Eric Levitz:
Michael McFaul/Abbas Milani:
The minimal value of Trump's 'maximum pressure' on Iran. I wrote
some about sanctions under Nichols below, but left out one point:
even when sanctions have devastating impact on the target nation's
people, they are rarely effective at deposing political leaders or
toppling their governments. The obvious example is that the only
communist countries to hold fast after 1989-92 were the ones the
US subjected to the most vindictive pressure: North Korea, Vietnam,
Cuba, and China.
Meridith McGraw:
Bush's Iraq hawks had Trump's back this week.
Melody Moezzi:
Trump's Twitter threats against Iran cultural sites borrow from the ISIS
playbook: Could also have mentioned the Taliban's destruction of
ancient Buddhist monuments in Afghanistan.
John Nichols:
Sanctions are economic warfare. There's an unnecessary word in that
title: Sanctions are warfare, meant to impoverish an "enemy," to cripple
their economy, ultimately to impose widespread suffering on all of the
people in the target country. The most extreme sanctions are literally
designed to starve the "enemy" into submission. Americans (like Trump)
like them, not just because they are effective in imposing pain, but
because they are asymmetrical. The economies of the US and its "allies"
(some should be called "co-conspirators"; others are more like hostages)
are so large that they can easily absorb the pain of not dealing with
the target country, while the target is prevented from engaging in
normal trade with much or most of the world. This size difference
means that no proportionate response in kind is possible. That's why
long-term victims of US sanctions like North Korea and Iran wind up
seeking other countermeasures, such as developing nuclear weapons --
as we've seen, the only measure that seems to get American attention.
Trump didn't back down from starting a war with Iran last week. He
actually escalated on ongoing war -- one that won't end until the US
suspends its sanctions against Iran, and permits Iran to normalize
its relations with the rest of the world.
Ella Nilsen:
Trump's conflict with Iran exposed the real difference between Biden
and Sanders. Good chance this has something to do with Sanders'
recent poll advances. First thing Laura told me after the Soleimani
assassination was "Trump just elected Bernie president."
Nathan J Robinson:
How to avoid swallowing war propaganda. Robinson also has a recent
book out, Why You Should Be a Socialist, as well as an earlier
one, Trump: Anatomy of a Monster (2017). Here's an
interview by Teddy Ostrow. The interview piece offers links to
highly critical pieces he wrote about Pete Buttigieg
(All
About Pete) and Joe Biden
(Everybody's
Chum). He turned me off a while back with a piece I don't recall
well enough to look up now -- possibly something snippy about Bernie
Sanders, but his latest thoughts on the campaign are worth reading:
Everyone is getting on the Bernie train. For example:
We need a candidate who fully understands the stakes. They need to know
the source of what has gone wrong and have a radical alternative. . . .
They can't capitulate before the fight starts. They need
to have a moral seriousness that shows they take the pain of others
seriously. They need to fill people's souls, to assuage their fears,
to challenge them to be their best selves, and to present a vision of
the beautiful world that could be if humanity got its act together,
versus the horrendous world that will be if we allow the deadly logic of
nuclear weapons and climate change to continue unfolding. This moment
demands something, a kind of power, we have never before mustered, a
resolve we have never before felt, a breadth and depth of vision we
have never before dared to pursue.
I cut a line from that paragraph: the one that starts "they can't
be some tepid compromiser." He's talking about Elizabeth Warren, and
I've been deluged today from her supporters taking umbrage that one
of Sanders' staffers suggested that she is the "second best" candidate,
so I figured we could do without the side-swipe. But I will note that
Robinson has a long paragraph on Warren that is pretty devastating:
look for the one that starts, "Personally I have long believed that
Elizabeth Warren would be a disaster against Donald Trump." Some of
his points don't bother me much, but "She is evasive where Bernie is
frank" does cut to the quick.
Gabor Rona:
Iran plane crash likely caused by violations of international law -- by
both Tehran and Trump.
Aaron Rupar:
Andrew Sullivan:
Donald Trump is the war crimes president. In his dreams, maybe.
He certainly lacks the elementary sense of right and wrong to steer
clear of war crimes, but neither does he have the track record of
GW Bush, let alone a Richard Nixon, and he still ranks well behind
others, notably Harry Truman (still the only person in history to
order the use of nuclear weapons on cities). On the other hand,
those presidents used larger wars to camouflage their crimes, and
probably didn't feel much kinship with the soldiers who carried
their directives out, let alone those who exceeded their orders.
Trump, on the other hand, has probably caught up with his reviled
predecessor Obama, who himself set records for "targeted killings."
Moreover, Trump's pardon of "Navy SEAL Commander Eddie Gallagher,
a rogue soldier who routinely shot civilians in Iraq for the hell
of it, and finally stabbed to death a barely conscious captive
young ISIS fighter who was the lone survivor of a missile hit on
an enemy house," shows a personal bloodlust beyond any president
I can recall.
Alex Ward:
Matthew Yglesias:
The administration's deceptions about the Soleimani strike are a big
deal.
Li Zhou:
The House sent a major message about checking the president's war powers
on Iran. Now why don't they follow it up with another impeachment
article? By the way, this time it appears that Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo
are also equally culpable, so why not name them too?
Some scattered links this week:
Katelyn Burns:
The Trump administration is still struggling to get its story straight
on why it killed Soleimani. Some curious phrasing, from Defense
Secretary Mark Esper: "What the President said with regard to the four
embassies is what I believe as well."
Nancy Pelosi explains what Democrats gaind by holding onto the articles
of impeachment.
Trump encourages new anti-government protests in Iran.
The Trump administration wants the Supreme Court to not rule on Obamacare
until after the 2020 election.
Another earthquake hits Puerto Rico, with aftershocks expected: A
6.4 on Tuesday, then a 5.9 on Saturday, with many aftershocks (45 and
counting of at least 3.0).
Trump has created a loophole to allow pipelines to avoid environmental
review. Refers to the Lisa Friedman article, below. When I first
read reports about this rule change, it was phrased vaguely in terms
of generic infrastructure projects, like bridges and roads, and meant
to cut through costly bureaucracy on projects where the environmental
impact was obviously limited. Pipelines are another story. They leak,
and the environmental impact of leaks is enormous. And at this point,
it's probably impossible to argue that a new pipeline won't increase
global warming, so eliminating that consideration is a life-and-death
matter to pipeline developers.
Edward Cavanough:
As Australia fires kill animals and destroy property, costs of climate
change become clear: "For those spuriously claiming climate ambition
comes at a cost, let Australia's black summer serve as a potent reminder
that inaction does, too."
Jonathan Chait:
Trump cited GOP Senate impeachment pressure as reason to kill Soleimani:
"You're not supposed to use foreign policy that way." Not that such
scruples stopped Bill Clinton when he was impeached.
Maybe nominating Michael Bloomberg for president isn't a crazy idea:
Chait's reasoning is that "only [Bloomberg] can outspend Trump five to
one." That's putting a lot of faith in the power of money to buy elections,
especially through lavish spending on TV. How's that working out? See:
Bloomberg and Steyer $200m spend on TV ads: "Steyer's spending in
South Carolina is beginning to slowly move the polls: he is now placed
fifth with 5% of projected Democratic voters." However, he's stuck at
1.5% nationally. Bloomberg is supposedly doing better nationwide --
I've seen polls as high as 7% -- but he's not even in the race for
Iowa or New Hampshire, nor has he qualified for a single debate, so
all he has going is his TV ad buy, and even there his selling point
is "Trump = bad," not Bloomberg offers unique hope for the real
problems the country faces. (Also see:
Michael Bloomberg outspent the entire Democratic field in TV ads last
week.) Sure, it might be nice if the Democrats could draw on
Bloomberg's deep pockets, but Bloomberg himself is by far the
most reactionary, elitist, offensive candidate in the running (a list
which, by the way, still includes John Delaney). [PS: Also see:
Michael Bloomberg is open to spending $1 billion to defeat Trump,
"even if the nominee was someone he had sharp differences with, like
Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren."]
Jonathan Cohn:
Iraq War at 154: Who voted for it, who didn't, and where are they
now?
Adam Davidson:
Donald Trump's worst deal: The shady story of Trump Tower Baku.
Miriam Elder/Ruby Cramer:
Donald Trump is starting to fixate on Bernie Sanders.
Tom Engelhardt:
The global war on error: "No, that's not a typo." And yes, error
is winning, handily.
Lisa Friedman:
Kathleen Geier:
What an Elizabeth Warren presidency would look like. This is paired
with Daniel Denvir:
What a Bernie Sanders presidency would look like. Both are pretty
good, although I'd give Sanders the edge for a foreign policy which
is based on principles of justice for all, and a political strategy
which promises to venture out to states beyond the "blue wall." I
don't think Warren is opposed to either point, but her instincts for
landing on the right side are less sure. The other thing about Warren
is that her appeal hasn't spread beyond college-educated professionals.
That should change if she's nominated, much like Buttigieg will wind
up with strong support from blacks if he makes it to November, but
Bernie has so far done a better job of broadening his base. In
These Times and didn't bother attempting to assay other Democratic
Party candidates. I doubt anyone really has a clue what a Buttigieg
presidency might look like. On the other hand, we can picture a Biden
one all too well.
John F Harris:
'He is our OJ': "Readers explain why they're standing with Trump during
impeachment." Author also wrote:
Impeachment and the crack up of the conservative mind.
Umair Irfan:
As Australia burns, its leaders are clinging to coal.
Sarah Jones:
Natalie Kitroeff:
Boeing employees mocked FAA and 'clowns' who designed 737 Max. As
one internal email put it, "this airplane is designed by clowns, who
are in turn supervised by monkeys." Reminds me of a friend who worked
for Boeing, telling me of a company meeting where a manager bragged,
"this isn't your father's Boeing any more." For the record, my father
retired from Boeing as soon as he could draw his pension, and refused
to ever fly in a Boeing airplane.
Elizabeth Kolbert:
What will another decade of climate crisis bring?
Michael Kruse:
Trump's art of the steal: "How Donald Trump rode to power by parroting
other people's fringe ideas, got himself impeached for it -- and might
prevail anyway."
German Lopez:
Study links Medicaid expansion to 6 percent reduction in opioid overdose
deaths.
Dylan Matthews:
A new study finds increasing the minimum wage reduces suicides.
Mark Mazzetti/Ronen Bergman/David D Kirkpatrick:
Saudis close to Crown Prince discussed killing other enemies a year
before Khashoggi's death.
John McPhee:
Tabula rasa: Volume one. Part of his "old-person project" -- writing
about what he never got around to writing about. I'm a big McPhee fan,
but this isn't especially promising.
Ian Millhiser:
The Trump administration's subtle, devious plan to dismantle abortion
rights: "The Supreme Court could quash the right to an abortion
entirely through procedural shenanigans."
Nicole Narea:
The Trump administration has finalized an agreement to deport asylum
seekers back to Honduras.
Anna North:
Trump tried to get E Jean Carroll's lawsuit dismissed. It didn't work.
Evan Osnos:
The future of America's context with China: "Washington is in an
intensifying standoff with Beijing. Which one will fundamentally shape
the twenty-first century?" Reminiscent of the 19th Century's "Great
Game" between Britain and Russia -- a contest which said much about
the self-absorption of so-called great powers, not least their inability
to consider that the rest of the world might have other plans.
Alex Pareene:
The most popular crook in America: Larry Hogan, the "very popular"
Republican governor of Maryland. For more, see Eric Cortellessa:
Who does Maryland's governor really work for? Pareene writes:
I've argued that, in many respects, the presidency of Donald Trump
is more "normal" than some people would like to admit. That is, it's a
logical end point of where conservatism has been moving, rather than an
inexplicable break from a system that was working as intended. But even
so, in his personal behavior and incendiary rhetoric, Trump is aberrant --
and, it should always be noted, he is deeply unpopular. The country, by
and large, doesn't want what Trump has wrought. His election was both
overdetermined and something of a bizarre fluke, which would, arguably,
not have happened had it not been for geography and our illogical modern
interpretation of archaic founding documents.
Hogan, on the other hand, is exactly the "normal" to which politicians
like Joe Biden promise to return us when they try to speak into existence
a Republican Party that they can "work with."
How political fact-checkers distort the truth: "Glenn Kessler and
his ilk aren't sticking to the facts. They are promoting a moderate
dogma."
Martin Pengelly:
How to dump Trump: Rick Wilson on Running Against the Devil.
Wilson is "a top Republican strategist with 30 years' experience," and
that's the title of his new book, a sequel to his 2018 book Everything
Trump Touches Dies.
Charles P Pierce: He writes more than a dozen short
posts a week,
many interesting, although for me it gets tiresome to delve
through all of them when I usually have some other source for the
same story (usually covered in more depth). Still, some titles
that caught my eye this week:
Andrew Prokop:
Pelosi: House will send impeachment articles to the Senate next week.
Frank Rich:
What will happen to the Trump toadies? "Look to Nixon's defenders,
and the Vichy collaborators, for clues." Steve M. has his doubts:
Frank Rich's delusions of cosmic justice.
Joshua Rothman:
The equality conundrum. Much nitpicking, not sure he comes up with
anything useful.
Aaron Rupar:
Dylan Scott:
Kansas has reached a deal to expand Medicaid, covering 150,000 people.
Not a "done deal," as there are still Republicans who will fight it.
Amy Davidson Sorkin:
In Ohio, Trump lists the sacrifices he makes for the nation.
Matt Stieb:
Matt Taibbi:
Matthew Yglesias:
Installing air filters in classrooms has surprisingly large educational
benefits.
Elizabeth Warren's new plan to reform bankruptcy law, explained
Bernie Sanders can unify Democrats and beat Trump in 2020. Surprised
to see this, given that Yglesias last tried his "electability" argument
to push Amy Klobuchar, and more generally given his designation as the
2019 "neoliberal shill of the year." This is supposed to be the "first
in a Vox series making the best case for each of the top Democratic
contenders," but I haven't noticed any of the others yet. Meanwhile,
there's Katelyn Burns:
Sanders tops latest Iowa poll, but the 2020 Democratic primary is still
a four way race.
The US-Saudi alliance is deeply unpopular with the American people.
The strong economy is an opportunity for progressives. Claims that
"voters are happy with the economy," citing a
CNN poll where 76 percent of voters rate economic conditions as
either "very good" or "somewhat good." Includes a chart that shows
that "pick-up in wage growth has come from low-wage industries" --
something I've seen others cite, but what I haven't seen is a chart
that distinguishes between low-wage workers who got raises due to
minimum wage increases compared with purely economic effects on the
labor market. There's no reason to attribute the former to Trump or
the Republicans -- just the opposite. And while raises for low wage
workers help, the poor are still poor, and prices -- Yglesias cites
child care as a major concern -- eat up a good chunk of income. But
even if Yglesias is right that most people are no longer worried
about the economy, he's also right that Democrats have other issues
to run on:
But one nice thing about a strong labor market is that it creates
political space to finally pay attention to the myriad social problems
that can't be solved by a "good economy" alone -- things like child
care, health care, college costs, and environmental protection -- that
during, the Obama years, tended to be crowded out by a jobs-first
mentality.
Good times, in other words, could be the perfect opportunity to
finally tackle the many long-lingering problems for which progressives
actually have solutions and about which conservatives would rather not
talk.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
prev -- next
|